Reply #85: Yes I agree about Fredda

[scottxyz]

While I may have devoted a great deal of energy to picking apart Fredda's arguments, I do welcome them, in that they function as a sort of "devil's advocate" and they may anticipate arguments that others may bring up once this story gets out.

For that reason, I do not favor even deleting posts on this thread, because it is always valuable to know what sort of arguments people might bring up.

I feel that in my two main posts so far I have laid out ample technical arguments as to why this GEMS Access database is not something any respectable manager would buy for a company, nor would a polling staffer buy it for vote-tallying work.

Fredda has raised some points, and I think by and large they were captivating but not central. This doesn't mean that such points won't be raised by other people, so it might be said that Fredda is performing a valuable service by vetting the arguments presented here.