You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Well... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
SanchoPanza Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well...
It would certainly drive down the salaries of HMO and Insurance Company executives, forcing them to find another way to make millions gambling on the health of others. But to answer your questions...

*1.Would nursing wages and benefits go down?*
There are a thousand reasons why wages for nurses could be lower in Canada, and simply because that country has Universal Health COVERAGE while the U.S. does not should not be taken as a causal relationship. Perhaps the nurses worked in the NW U.S. so they didn't have to pay higher tax rates in Canada.

*2.How would we pay for UH?*
As a nation we're paying more for private insurance than any country with a national coverage system, principally for two reasons:

- Over the past few decades the insurance industries have made some extremely poor investment choices, and thus have had to raise the cost of healthcare premiums. For those of you who dont know, insurance companies of all stripes operate a lot like banks. They take the money from premiums and invest it, using the returns to pay for claims and overhead. Though this is generally true of all insurance industries, in terms of the craptacular investments they've made, it is particularly true in healthcare. In the malpractice sector it should be considered an outright scandal, and is the real reason malpractice premiums are hitting over $100k.

- A long list of predatory practices by HMOs. Automatic denial of initial claims, conflicting policy language where a patient can assume a service is covered but in reality isn't, etc, etc. The result is people often being put into serious financial jeapordy due to any catastrophic care costs.

By all accounts we would be paying less for coverage through a public system and getting rid of the private beauracracies, price gouging, and mismanagement. That's my favorite argument from conservatives: there is no beauracracy or mismanagement in private enterprise! Every corporation runs at 100% efficiency!

*3.Are nurses wages so low in Canada that they are crossing the
border to work in the US to make ends meet?*
There is no reason for me to think so. No offense intended, but your colleague could be a friggin' liar. People like to make up stories to give their ideological causes an anecdotal reality. Hell, people make radio, television, and literary careers out of such a practice. Best bet is to check out the facts for yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC