Reply #103: Well, that's interesting...

[SDuderstadt]

I sorted through the various links and something seems oddly missing. Where is the actual ARRB document that shows that? I don't think YouTube clips and links to people telling me what they think the document means is direct proof, do you?

I have read the ARRB's final report and, thus, I was a little surprised to find these clains, inasmuch as the ARRB concluded no such thing. Jim Garrison ran a sloppy investigation and Oliver Stone did the American public a great disservice by making a movie rife with material errors, although I' not sure we should have expected much different, given Stone's reliance upon Fletcher Prouty. You can believe this claptrap if you want, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for a bombshell that isn't coming. When you can conclusively refute the mountain of evidence against Oswald, let me know.

46 years and you guys are no closer to "solving" this thing than you were decades ago. Does that tell you something?