Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| -Paul Krugman:The 3 A.M. Call |
cal04 |
Sep-28-08 11:20 PM |
#0 |
 -
Bernie Sanders or Dennis Kucinich. |
Eric J in MN |
Sep-28-08 11:24 PM |
#1 |
 -
Good luck finding them in your ballot n/t |
n2doc |
Sep-29-08 05:57 AM |
#10 |
 -
And that's relevant ot the OP how? |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 06:32 AM |
#11 |
| -
"Whom do you trust to take that call?" |
Eric J in MN |
Sep-29-08 09:14 AM |
#31 |
| -
Irony for you..Robert Rubin was once the head of Goldman Sachs...like Paulson. |
BrklynLiberal |
Sep-28-08 11:27 PM |
#2 |
| -
"We’ve known for a long time, of course, that Mr. McCain doesn’t know much about economics" |
Annoyinglysmart |
Sep-28-08 11:30 PM |
#3 |
| -
Avoidance-avoidance. |
hay rick |
Sep-28-08 11:55 PM |
#4 |
| -
I learned "the essentials" about Mr. Paul Krugman's TRUE character by the way |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 12:37 AM |
#5 |
| -
No, he did not lie about Obama |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 01:16 AM |
#7 |
| -
No, Krugman LIED and shilled for HRC. I'm not a fanatic, but it goes to character. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 01:28 AM |
#8 |
| -
He has been wrong about the crisis on numerous occasions, too. |
girl gone mad |
Sep-29-08 01:39 AM |
#9 |
| -
Name them. |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 07:09 AM |
#20 |
| -
Krugman didn't lie |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 06:34 AM |
#12 |
| -
Krugman showed an unseamly underbelly - I don't trust him. eom |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 06:47 AM |
#14 |
| -
Krugman was honest with his disagreement. Obama fanatics are unseemly |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 07:09 AM |
#19 |
| -
Oh stop calling us "fanatics" ... Krugman was smarmy and he is a man NOT to be trusted. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:11 AM |
#22 |
| -
Not all of us trust "Saint" Obama either |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 07:46 AM |
#27 |
| -
See, I don't idolize any of them - but I do know when a person is compromising his/her |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:59 AM |
#30 |
| -
What evidence do you have that Krugman compromised himself? |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 09:44 AM |
#33 |
| -
Name-calling does not impress me |
CAcyclist |
Sep-29-08 01:53 PM |
#36 |
| -
Considering the nature of your posts |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 07:10 AM |
#21 |
| -
Back at ya! When you attack "the person," you've conceded the argument. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:12 AM |
#23 |
| -
You haven't "argued" anything |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 07:14 AM |
#25 |
| -
Wow! How mature. You've been screaming with your dress held over you head throughout this entire |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:17 AM |
#26 |
| -
Not everyone admires Obama, including those of us who voted for him |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 07:47 AM |
#28 |
| -
The attacks were unwarranted - Krugman was HRC's bitch and it showed. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:57 AM |
#29 |
| -
Where's the evidence that Krugman was HRC's "bitch"? |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 09:45 AM |
#34 |
| -
You sound just like the HRC fanatics who blamed sexism for her loss |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 07:07 AM |
#17 |
| -
I'm sorry that not everybody loves "Saint Krugman" but he proved his low character |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 07:13 AM |
#24 |
| -
Oh, good lord. Krugman's a person with opinions, not the Antichrist. |
ColonelTom |
Sep-29-08 09:42 AM |
#32 |
| -
I consider Krugman morally compromised. I'm not alone and entitled to my opinion. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-29-08 02:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
Then Obama is compromised too |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 10:56 PM |
#38 |
| -
"where are the adults?" |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 06:37 AM |
#13 |
| -
wow, this bill right now or meltdown. |
tomp |
Sep-29-08 06:52 AM |
#15 |
| -
I happen to agree with Krugman |
depakid |
Sep-29-08 07:08 AM |
#18 |
| -
so you agree with somebody and i agree with somebody else. |
tomp |
Sep-29-08 01:17 PM |
#35 |
| -
"one has the suspicion that a McCain administration would have us longing for Bush-era competence" |
Larkspur |
Sep-29-08 01:13 AM |
#6 |
| -
i don't know enough about high finance. |
tomp |
Sep-29-08 06:54 AM |
#16 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread