Reply #88: Read my post again...

[Media_Lies_Daily]

...and read my other posts in this thread and then tell me again that OBL and Al Qaeda were definitely responsible for 911. The only way anyone can believe that is by believing that the NeoCons are telling us the truth about 911.

If OBL and Al Qaeda were actually responsible for 911, why did OBL initially DENY responsibility? Why would he not accept responsibility for 911 as he had for all of the other terrorist acts in which he had been involved?

Why do you insist on putting words in my posts that are plainly not there? I have never stated that OBL never had training camps in Afghanistan. I also never stated that Clinton did not try to kill OBL on more than one instance for terrorist attacks for which OBL claimed responsibility. If you can find anything that supports your rather deceptive comments, please post the proof.

Here's another question for you...if we knew where OBL was based in Afghanistan, and we most certainly did, why did we choose to invade and occupy the entire country instead of just taking out the camps and the people in them with a special forces action? Why did we allow the Pakistanis to send in airplanes to supposedly fly out their people which also resulted in the escape of OBL and Al Qaeda, when Al Qaeda was surrounded?

Additionally, since it's been stated many times publicly that Al Qaeda was a network of terrorists located in more than 60 countries, why did we choose to exercise a full-blown military option against the entire country of Afghanistan instead of going after the entire network using special forces and other means? Why did we then divert the bulk of our capabilities and invade Iraq, a country with absolutely no link to Al Qaeda, and no WMDs?

But hey, if you want to cling to the belief that the 911 "official story" is correct as told to us by the NeoCons, feel free to do so.