33. Same thing that happens to any person which violates the local laws
But if Country A does not permit freedom of religion, we still do not, in Country B, "reciprocate" by banning that religion.
I don't really understand the point of the question. Are you suggesting that the countries of the world should be engaged in some sort of global "tit for tat" in how they make laws that apply to behavior within their own borders?
It's illegal to be a Nazi in Germany. It is legal to be a Nazi in the US. Should we go further and make it mandatory that all Germans in the US have to be Nazis? What's the point?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
