You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #108: Bet you wish you read #105 before posting that. Let me know [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Bet you wish you read #105 before posting that. Let me know
Edited on Tue Aug-17-10 03:00 PM by FBaggins
when you wipe the egg off your face (and/or get the 9th circuit to admit that they don't understand federal court practice).

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -9th Circuit grants indefinite stay in Prop 8 case Newsjock  Aug-16-10 05:59 PM   #0 
  - That sucks. I wonder what the reasoning was...  petronius   Aug-16-10 06:00 PM   #1 
  - Well, the *good* news is that the 9th circuit remains the most-overturned  Lance_Boyle   Aug-16-10 06:00 PM   #2 
  - when?  Francesca9   Aug-16-10 11:43 PM   #66 
  - "the world's worst court" might be just a little hyperbolic. (nt)  Posteritatis   Aug-17-10 10:30 AM   #94 
  - Like the man said, justice delayed is justice denied.  KamaAina   Aug-16-10 06:01 PM   #3 
  - Its scheduled for December. How is that "indefinite"?  DURHAM D   Aug-16-10 06:03 PM   #4 
  - Well, when you've got Obama to bash.....n/t  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 06:06 PM   #5 
  - What motivates you to come into these threads about equal marriage rights?  ruggerson   Aug-16-10 10:07 PM   #57 
     - I want equal marriage rights for all. n/t  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 09:46 AM   #90 
  - That's the earliest that the appeal can be heard, but there is no time limit to how long it will  totodeinhere   Aug-16-10 09:16 PM   #54 
  - The stay will probably remain in effect until a final decision has been rendered--perhaps by the  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:01 AM   #73 
  - Motherfuckers.  pgodbold   Aug-16-10 06:15 PM   #6 
  - Why? You've got an expedited appeal on standing. How is that bad?  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 06:22 PM   #7 
     - Bingo!  aranthus   Aug-18-10 05:27 PM   #129 
  - And of course this pleases the President for he is against  Bluenorthwest   Aug-16-10 06:33 PM   #8 
  - And of course, you've got an expedited appeal. How is that bad? n/t  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 06:49 PM   #9 
  - You can't spin it as good news  FBaggins   Aug-16-10 07:53 PM   #33 
  - It's not good or bad--it's court process. This isn't 'the appeal', FYI.  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 08:05 PM   #34 
     - That's incorrect.  FBaggins   Aug-16-10 08:16 PM   #37 
     - No--I am correct--it's not 'the appeal.'  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 09:41 AM   #88 
        - Sorry... once again that's incorrect.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 10:21 AM   #92 
           - Jeebus. As the defense is not appealing, only the proponents, and the  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 12:49 PM   #98 
              - Nope.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 01:34 PM   #100 
                 - So you still haven't read Walker's ruling on standing regarding Imperial County?  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 01:52 PM   #102 
                    - I have and I've already corrected you on it.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 02:20 PM   #104 
                    - O dear Jeebus, still haven't read the actual decision, have you?  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 02:53 PM   #107 
                       - Bet you wish you read #105 before posting that. Let me know  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 02:55 PM   #108 
                       - Again, thank you for posting proof you can't read a docket.  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:10 PM   #110 
                          - Really? lol  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:16 PM   #112 
                             - Answered downthread. Stop conflating docket numbers and case numbers.....  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:24 PM   #115 
                                - Tell it to the 9th.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:26 PM   #116 
                                   - I answered you below--I think we are just mistaking each other....  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:34 PM   #118 
                                      - 10-16751 was docketed almost a week ago.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:46 PM   #120 
                       - I'm not an attorney; however, I played the judge in "Miracle on  24601   Aug-17-10 06:35 PM   #126 
                    - Game Set and Match.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 02:25 PM   #105 
                       - Thank you for posting this. It confirms that you are incorrect.  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:08 PM   #109 
                          - Lol... time to stop digging. Check the case numbers.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:15 PM   #111 
                             - Dude--those are docket numbers...the case number on both documents is  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:21 PM   #113 
                                - Better tell the 9th circuit that they don't know what a case number is.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:23 PM   #114 
                                   - You know I think I know why you are confusing this.....  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 03:31 PM   #117 
                                      - Sorry... no. It isn't the same thing. There are two cases.  FBaggins   Aug-17-10 03:41 PM   #119 
                                         - Nice!  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 04:46 PM   #125 
     - No, granting an appeal that has been properly sought is process, A stay is not an inevitable side  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:15 AM   #76 
        - This has been properly sought, and a stay in this case  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 09:46 AM   #89 
           - Um, I was contradicting your erroneous claim that "It's not good or bad--it's court process."  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 04:17 PM   #123 
  - How is the stay bad? Geez.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:08 AM   #75 
     - I said 'expedited appeal.'  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 10:00 AM   #91 
        - LOL. Take another look at Replies 6 and 7, both of which were the context of my reply to you.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 04:40 PM   #124 
  - Which "unpracticed faith" do you mean, pray tell?  MineralMan   Aug-16-10 06:55 PM   #10 
  - Good question. Rick Warren's, apparently--or so it might seem.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:24 AM   #83 
  - President was against Prop 8.  boppers   Aug-16-10 06:59 PM   #11 
  - And his public statements against equal marriage were used by Prop 8 backers  Smashcut   Aug-16-10 07:40 PM   #29 
  - Yes, they are.  boppers   Aug-16-10 07:50 PM   #32 
     - LOL.  Smashcut   Aug-16-10 08:11 PM   #35 
     - No prob. It's a pretty good article.  boppers   Aug-16-10 08:29 PM   #39 
        - How could any article totally explain what has been called "Obama's awkward stance" on equal  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:02 AM   #80 
     - Your link adds no new "fact" and does not rebut Smashcut's post.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:37 AM   #78 
  - True, but he also opposed same gender marriage because "God is in the mix" of marriage, a  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:24 AM   #77 
  - Unlikely, since Obama was against Prop 8.  NYC Liberal   Aug-16-10 07:14 PM   #13 
  - yes, he was such a vocal opponent of it..  t0dd   Aug-16-10 07:28 PM   #27 
  - Upthread...  boppers   Aug-16-10 08:24 PM   #38 
  - t0dd's post, like Smashcut's, reflects reality..  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:11 AM   #81 
  - Ah yes, Obama was against it, but he was "REALLY" for it  NYC Liberal   Aug-16-10 10:53 PM   #62 
     - How does one simultaneously oppose prop 8 and marriage equality?  t0dd   Aug-16-10 10:58 PM   #64 
     - So you claim he supported Prop 8, even though he didn't?  NYC Liberal   Aug-16-10 11:06 PM   #65 
        - Put words into other folks' posts much? t0dd's question is 100% valid. See Reply ##s 77, 27 and 80  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:42 AM   #84 
           - My first post in this thread was a response to the claim  NYC Liberal   Aug-17-10 12:01 PM   #97 
              - None of which has a thing to do with my Reply 84 to you, which, in turn, had  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 03:55 PM   #122 
     - Attacking Obama's critics doesn't prove your point, either.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:57 AM   #85 
        - Correcting a factual error helps everyone. nt  NYC Liberal   Aug-17-10 11:56 AM   #96 
  - He is against same gender marriage. Please see Reply 77  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 07:15 AM   #82 
     - He is against Prop 8, so the claim that  NYC Liberal   Aug-17-10 11:55 AM   #95 
  - I feel ya, but, to be fair, he did say he did not approve of Prop 8.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 06:06 AM   #74 
  - This does not bode well. [n/t]  stranger81   Aug-16-10 07:01 PM   #12 
  - Federal court blocks same-sex weddings in California while appeal considered  KamaAina   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #14 
  - Fuckers. You'll see now why elections matter. Judicial appointments matter!  xultar   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #15 
  - Jeebus calm down...expected, and we dont even know if  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #17 
  - Calling them fuckers is not hysterics. You calling me hysterical for calling them fuckers is  xultar   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #20 
  - your reply made me smile -thanks  tomm2thumbs   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #23 
  - Me Too!  Binka   Aug-16-10 08:54 PM   #41 
  - Calling appellate judges 'fuckers' before they have actually ruled? Hysterical.  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #24 
  - What's the matter with you?  DURHAM D   Aug-16-10 10:16 PM   #58 
  - Posting "judicial appointments matter" is "hysterics?" LOL  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 08:00 AM   #86 
  - Clinton appointed 2.  SnakeEyes   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #25 
     - That was the panel deciding on the stay,  Sapphocrat   Aug-17-10 12:02 AM   #67 
     - And your point would be?  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 08:11 AM   #87 
  - Expected--and not anything to wet your pants over.  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #16 
  - Really...how dare you tell our GLBT DUers to "chill?"  MineralMan   Aug-16-10 07:18 PM   #26 
  - I think you are conflating me with another poster.  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 07:42 PM   #30 
     - Yes, there is often disappointment.  MineralMan   Aug-16-10 07:47 PM   #31 
        - I take your point. n/t  msanthrope   Aug-16-10 08:14 PM   #36 
  - Extending this stay was NOT expected.  Sapphocrat   Aug-17-10 12:07 AM   #68 
     - Kindly cite your legal authorities.  msanthrope   Aug-17-10 01:35 PM   #101 
        - The county clerks, to name one bunch...  Sapphocrat   Aug-17-10 01:56 PM   #103 
  - No..if you read the order  SoCalNative   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #18 
  - More from the LATimes...  flpoljunkie   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #19 
  - that was helpful information - thank you  tomm2thumbs   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #21 
  - This is what happens when spineless Dems/Libs/Progressives just sit on their hands...  SoapBox   Aug-16-10 07:16 PM   #22 
     - Oh, you did NOT just lump us  Le Taz Hot   Aug-17-10 06:58 AM   #79 
  - Clinton and Reagan fucked us again  AllTooEasy   Aug-16-10 07:32 PM   #28 
  - That is so wrong! n/t  proReality   Aug-16-10 08:42 PM   #40 
  - PROP 8: Stay Granted; Case Expedited; Standing Questioned  GodlessBiker   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #42 
  - Fuckers.  Smashcut   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #43 
  - they're bending over to be fair (perhaps I should rephrase that)  paulkienitz   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #48 
  - Grrrrrrrrrrrr! Nt  xchrom   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #44 
  - What's the bad news?  dencol   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #45 
  - 3 Judges Who Made This Call BTW (I understand different judges will decide issues)  tomm2thumbs   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #46 
  - three things:  tomm2thumbs   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #47 
  - The decision comes after the November elections. Good thing or bad thing?  NorthCarolina   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #49 
  - I don't think anyone really knows, but...  Sapphocrat   Aug-17-10 12:14 AM   #69 
  - This issue is being exploited for political advantage by Republicans.  closeupready   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #50 
  - While the standing issue is important  customerserviceguy   Aug-16-10 09:02 PM   #51 
  - But if those who argued before Walker had no standing---  Moonwalk   Aug-16-10 09:10 PM   #53 
  - You're right about the automatic loss  customerserviceguy   Aug-16-10 09:21 PM   #55 
  - NOTHING can change Walker's ruling in the case, unless a higher court overrules him.  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 03:50 PM   #121 
  - Except that there's a stricter set of criteria...  Sapphocrat   Aug-17-10 12:25 AM   #71 
  - Let's hope that the standing issue ends this. But, I guess the jerks could appeal if they are found  No Elephants   Aug-17-10 05:53 AM   #72 
  - Whats with the 'oh its not that bad" bullshit on here...what the fuck?  and-justice-for-all   Aug-16-10 09:07 PM   #52 
  - E)  CocaNova   Aug-16-10 10:36 PM   #61 
  - "Whats with the 'oh its not that bad" bullshit on here"??  Occulus   Aug-17-10 02:35 PM   #106 
     - Yep, sure is...reada through the post..nt  and-justice-for-all   Aug-18-10 02:12 PM   #127 
        - I had to log out to see who it was  Occulus   Aug-18-10 04:23 PM   #128 
  - I am watching this for an entirely different reason  FirstLight   Aug-16-10 09:42 PM   #56 
  - The Marriage and Divorce Industries NEED Gay Marriage  Phil The Cat   Aug-16-10 10:28 PM   #60 
  - Crap!  Odin2005   Aug-16-10 10:21 PM   #59 
  - The actual full text of the order (one main paragraph) can be read at this link  2 Much Tribulation   Aug-16-10 10:55 PM   #63 
  - California Gay Marriage on Hold as Case Is Appealed  Amerigo Vespucci   Aug-17-10 12:22 AM   #70 
  - This is ridiculous. n/t  Mad_Dem_X   Aug-17-10 10:28 AM   #93 
  - On being a second class citizen -- aka Gays are not welcome in America  Politicub   Aug-17-10 12:50 PM   #99 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC