Reply #140: What exactly -

[Mike K]

<...>if they are are not "of age", nor participated in any of the corruption. It is immoral to drag the sons and daughters into the fray, unless they have taken the same stance and commit the same actions.<...>

- does "of age" mean? And what exactly do you mean by dragging "into the fray?" His children have not been tarred and feathered -- as their father deserves to be.

Don't you think it's the responsibility of the offending parent to consider the impact his actions will have on his family? Did this particular sonofabitch demonstrate concern for the children who were made homeless because of his greed?

Actions have consequences and people who offend should not expect to escape retribution because they have innocent children. Whatever suffering befalls the banker's children is the direct result of the banker's actions.

Your position is unreasonably pious.