Reply #302: If they have done those things, as they seem to have

[JonQ]

then the theory based around the falsified data and defended by a "a lack of counter argument" cannot be sustained.

How are you not understanding this? They falsified data it seems, and destroyed it when necessary. That is both a reflection on their merits as individuals (irrelevant though) and a condemnation of their work. They are bad scientists, that is obvious, and because they are bad scientists their conclusions are suspect.

It's actually very simple, most everyone else gets it.