Reply #329: like I said, you're done

[iverglas]

The only reason these aren't being attributed to the vaccines is that their incidence was small and also happened in the "placebo group" (which is a laughable "safety" comparison considering that this group was given a shot of aluminum poison in lieu of the vaccine -- which also contains a shot of aluminum poison, of course).

The substance in question being common to other vaccines in common use, you have no point as regards Gardasil per se, or mandatory administration of Gardasil per se.

However, NOT ONE SUBJECT CONTRACTED CERVICAL CANCER IN THE ENTIRE PLACEBO GROUP. What kind of risk vs. reward is that?

Wrong question. Right question: what kind of transparent and unseemly intellectual dishonesty is THAT?