Reply #174: You have no case AND you refuse to read!

[depakid]

I've cited three of the best sources available anywhere on the net in this thread. Colby Beck's piece in Grist How to talk to a climate skeptic is particularly well organized and useful.

In a matter of minutes, you can find just about every "argument" the so called "skptics" make- along with proof of why they're BS.

But you won't "waste your time" reading it, so what else can people to do but go ad hominem? Especially when your screen name is "thinking woman." Can you not see the irony there?

There is a worldwide scientific consensus on Anthropogenic global warming. No credible scientist disagrees with that- and NO papers refuting that have been published in any peer reviewed journal since 1993.

It's not "just a theory" any more than gravity or entropy are merely theories.