You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Not correct [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Not correct
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 02:37 PM by Teaser
First off, lets get one thing straight: the cleric is fucktarded. I don't want anyone misconstruing my post.

However, if one says "much of what is said about <OBJECT> is no more than X"

this is different than "<OBJECT> is no more than X"

The first statement says that many STATEMENTS ABOUT <OBJECT> = X.

The second statement says that <OBJECT> = X.

The first is an equation of merely a portion of the descriptors of <OBJECT>
The second is an equation of the entirety of the being of <OBJECT>

entirely different.

That said, again, the cleric is fucktardamente.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC