You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: yes, but that was kinda my point [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. yes, but that was kinda my point
It is a church holding my history (the public's history) hostage.

I *chose* to go to evensong at Salisbury -- for my own reasons,the music, architecture and family connection, which were not incompatible with a church service; I had other opportunities to explore the cathedral without religion bothering me or vice versa. And Sunday service in Wellingborough for the same reasons (sadly, the incense smoked me right out halfway through, true but still a good excuse); and Sunday service in Bath for the heck of it. The fact is that religion *is* an integral part of a culture, just as the MP jokes the comic who did the walking tour of Bath told the night before are (always read the papers when you travel; you'll get the jokes that none of the other tourists do), and religion is particularly integrated in the case of English history/culture. I chose to go on his walking tour so I didn't talk when he was talking, and ditto for the church services.

But I went to Westminster for the history, not the religion. I wouldn't have wandered in to an actual service and got pissed about the interference: you're right, it is a functioning church, and that is a factual part of the church/history integration.

But the lord's prayer over a loudspeaker every hour on the hour, and stand still and shut up? Gimme a break, really. We were told it was to "remind" us that this was a church. And that, to me, really is just holding history hostage.

And the fact is that Westminster IS a museum, as well as being a church. Not an "art museum", an historical museum. It holds a warehouseful, a millennium's worth, of unique artefacts that are vital to any study / appreciation of English history and culture. And graves of poets and monarchs are graves, not relics.

And a church that is in possession of that much history of such importance simply doesn't, in my rather well-reasoned opinion, get to place its arbitrary conditions on the public having access to it. I won't interfere in their religious practices, they don't interfere in my cultural/historical experience. Seems fair to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC