You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #75: LIHOP - PNAC on Nightline [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
75. LIHOP - PNAC on Nightline
JACKIE JUDD

(Voice Over) The letter to Mr. Clinton, was in essence, a preview of arguments that would have a more receptive audience five years later. The Clinton White House did bomb Baghdad in 1998, after America's containment policy of Saddam laid dormant, until a Tuesday morning in September. A 76-page white paper, circulating for a year and arguing for an aggressive US foreign policy, suddenly gained new relevance.

JACKIE JUDD (CONTINUED)

(Off Camera) In the blueprint, it says, the process of transformation is likely to be a long one. Absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor. Was 9/11, your Pearl Harbor?

GARY SCHMITT

I think it was the country's Pearl Harbor. I think it was the President's Pearl Harbor.

JACKIE JUDD

(Voice Over) The Project, agitating outside and now inside the Administration, seized an opportunity after 9/11, which made war inevitable, argues Professor Ian Lustick of the University of Pennsylvania.

PROFESSOR IAN LUSTICK

Before 9/11, this group was in the position it is in but could not win over the President to this extravagant image of what foreign policy required. After 9/11, it was able to benefit from the gigantic eruption of political capital, combined with the supply of military preponderance in the hands of the President. And this small group, therefore, was able to gain direct contact and even control, now, of the White House.

JACKIE JUDD

(Voice Over) According to the book "Bush At War," by Bob Woodward, it was only 30 hours after the 9/11 attacks, that Rumsfeld asked the President, why shouldn't the US go against Iraq, not just al-Qaeda? At the Pentagon on September 13th, Wolfowitz, for the first time, alluded to that broader goal.

Will the MSM question this - hell no. After all we got Prince Charles marrying Camilla and Michael Jackson. That Bush, Cheney and the PNAC cabal MIHOP, LIHOP or just out and out were grossly incompetent is of no importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC