AT&T did block the site I don't see how that is a violation of the 1st. "4chan" owns their content but the AT&T network is owned by AT&T. There is no law I'm aware of saying that have to transmit anyone's information on their network.
This would be like saying the NY Times violated someone's rights because they wouldn't publish a letter to the editor or a family portrait on page 1.
I'm certainly no lawyer, but is there something I'm missing here? (legally speaking, not opinions per se)
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(85 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
