You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #75: Executive orders regarding the military are definitely the province of the Commander in Chief, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Executive orders regarding the military are definitely the province of the Commander in Chief,
Edited on Sat May-09-09 01:10 PM by No Elephants
thouogh, unlike the way that Bush abused them.

And while Obama "move slowly" on this issue, people are losing their careers and/or avoiding entering the military to begin with. Tha is not only a violation of equal rights, but an issue of our safety. We do not have enough troops that we can afford to lose any, and our dearth of Arabic speaking troops is especially severe.

Truman did not wait for a consensus to integrate the military. He just recognized a grievous wrong and corrected it because it was his moral and Constitutional responsiblity so to do.

Unlike TRuman, though, who simply woke up to an injustice and acted to remedy it. Obama made a specific campaign promise on this.

He CAN do this by Executive Order. Therefore when he allows this troop to lose her career and tells her it "needs" Congress, he is attemting to deceive her.

The states don't have to lead the way on this issue, nor can they. It's the military of the United States. That is the sole bailiwick of the feds in general and the Commander in Chief in particular.

Building consensus with the neocons is a joke. Have you seen how the Republicans react whenever anyone attempts anything with them, other than total surrender?

you don't delay human rights for political cover, especially if you can remedy something with a strong of a pen.

Besides, this was a specific campaign promise and elections have consequences. Besides, it's not all about consensus. The POTUS is supposed to lead, no more so than when he functions as Commander in Chief. And, no matter what, attempting to deceive a troop who has just lost her career bc he broke his campaign promise is beyond the pale.

Bottom line, though, your post said this was a "start." It is not a start. His campaign promise was the start.

Not sure what disbelief you are referring to. These are facts that are a matter of record or a matter of law. I am not relying on belief.

Peace to you as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC