Reply #102: I see it as attack, get lies out and keep repeating them, question

[barb162]

the integrity of the other side, change the subject if someone asks a hard question, put the other side on the defensive with lies and innuendo and keep them there, get some very clear, simplistic phony issues (moral values) aand repeat ad infinitum, etc.

I am not saying the Dems should do all of this. We (or I should say the Dem campaign people) were not attacking. They also should have been doing some amount of innuendo, like where the hell was Bush again in 1972 and why is this person sending others to fight a war that never should have been started?