Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Herseth Sandlin(D-S.D.) is now actually bragging that she stopped Pelosi's agenda!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 06:27 AM
Original message
Herseth Sandlin(D-S.D.) is now actually bragging that she stopped Pelosi's agenda!



The first female Speaker’s famous iron grip on her Caucus has been shaken lately by another woman.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has made passing a jobs agenda her top priority this year, but an anti-deficit insurgency led by Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-S.D.), the administrative co-chairwoman of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, has forced Pelosi to scale back her ambitions.

With concerns about deficits rising and rank-and-file Democrats fearing losses in November, Blue Dog clout has soared in recent weeks, and liberal priorities from health care benefits for the jobless to tens of billions of dollars in aid to the states have ended up on the chopping block. In the tumult, Herseth Sandlin has emerged to head a new generation of Blue Dogs as old-guard members such as Rep. John Tanner (D-Tenn.) are heading for the exits or lowering their profiles.

The pivotal moment came shortly before the Memorial Day recess, with Pelosi planning to push through a nearly $200 billion package of tax cut extensions, doctor payments, jobless benefits and state aid. But Herseth Sandlin warned the measure didn’t have the votes and would have to be trimmed significantly.

“While we’ve been invited to share our concerns and leadership has listened, not everyone is hearing us,” she told reporters at the time.

Within a day, Democratic leaders were forced to carve their bill nearly in half in a mad scramble for votes.

And this week, the leadership’s plans for a war spending bill had to be cut back in the face of demands from Blue Dogs that add-on aid for states and money for the Pell Grant program be fully offset. The bill will include just $10 billion to prevent teacher layoffs — less than half the amount sought by leadership and President Barack Obama.

“They are starting to hear us,” Herseth Sandlin said.

But the smaller pie is a big disappointment for members of Pelosi’s liberal inner circle, such as Education and Labor Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.).

“Sure, it’s frustrating,” Miller said, pointing to the continuing economic troubles as an emergency.

“There’s concern in the markets about what’s going on at the state level, and it’s counterproductive to do it the way they want to do it,” Miller said of the Blue Dogs.

The backlash is such that other liberals such as Progressive Caucus Co-Chairman Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.) have grumbled recently about paying their Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dues out of concern it will go to Blue Dog members and other candidates with more conservative agendas.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, ripped the idea that an emergency jobs package must be paid for, noting that the pay-as-you-go law championed by fiscal conservatives has an exception for emergencies.

“People desperately need jobs, and it’s a shame and a disgrace that it’s not declared an emergency,” Lee said.

But Herseth Sandlin said she is gratified to see a renewed interest in the deficit in the House, Senate and country as a whole. She said the issue has gone far beyond Blue Dogs.

“It’s not just a Blue Dog concern any more,” she said. “Blue Dogs ... are grateful that we finally have not only some wind at our backs in terms of public sentiment, but we have colleagues in our Caucus and Republicans who are now expressing the same amount of concern about the debt and deficits that we’ve been expressing for a number of years, regardless of who has been in the White House and who has been in control.”

She said the Blue Dogs have had to stick together to force leadership’s hand on several occasions and complained that too many bills have been hashed out in leadership conference rooms, typically dominated by liberals, rather than through regular order.

“We just have to be the squeaky wheel or we’re not going to get through that inner circle,” she said.

A House Democratic leadership aide defended the Speaker’s record of working with Blue Dogs and delivering items they wanted, such as a PAYGO law. The aide also pointed to extensive hearings and markups on energy and health care bills and said the biggest problem with getting jobs bills passed isn’t the legislation itself but the fact that bills are “stuck in the Senate.” The aide also noted that Blue Dogs who hail from districts with high unemployment rates have been supportive of the bills, even if Herseth Sandlin isn’t.


http://www.rollcall.com/issues/56_1/news/48012-1.html



:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. All Politics Are Local...
You don't run the same campaign in South Dakota as you do in Salsalito or Scranton, PA or Ft. Lauderdale...each candidate is on their own and do what they need to to win. South Dakota is a very conservative state and to win in that state one has to cater to those voters and that means bucking the party "establishment". The corporate media has already declared this election as being an "anti-incumbent" election and thus we're seeing incumbents (many Democrats in red areas) attempting to say they're running against the "establishment". This is no different than the campaign Lincoln ran and we've seen in other Congressional districts.

The bottom line is to maintain a majority a national party has to be able to include many types of constituents...including Blue Dogs who will vote with you 50% of the time vs. some teabagging rushpublican who won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I understand the S.D. is a conservative state, but no matter how
conservative it is, democrats should not be voting against Pell grants and cutting education monies or demanding that an emergency jobs package "must be paid for".That is not a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unemployment is 4.5% in SD, if you don't count the Lakota rate of around
80%. But you don't have to worry about the Lakota voting, you can send all your bubbas to the polling places and run off the voters. Maybe next time, they won't be able to get an injunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's All About Winning...
I agree that if my Democratic representative voted against such a bill I'd be out making sure she regretted such a vote, but Sundelin's in a tough race and last polls I saw she was behind by a considerable amount. The problem is we're in tough times and that state has felt it harder than most. When the Democrats were in the minority, a Sundelin could get by as it was easy to pin all problems on the GOOP, now that the shoe is on the other foot that anger is directed at Democrats. Yes its short sighted, but this is how politics is these days...fueled by hate radio and 24/7 cable food fights...pushed by a meme that the government (and Democrats in specific) are spendthrifts (while the GOOPs massive defecits of the booosh era are ignored) and that one has to be "fiscally responsible". It's all short sighted politics but for a vulnerable congresscriter we've seen they'll do or say anything to stay in power.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I understand a democrat running as a blue dog in S.D., however
there is never any need for a democrat to trash an education bill, Pell grants, or demand a balanced budget no matter the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Wind at our backs..."
One of these days, the aim will get better, the foot will connect, and the Blue Dog will go flying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. I remember her campaign to get elected
She bought ads on all the progressive sites like DKos and FDL and she presented herself as this new, progressive leader.

Campaigned left, turned HARD RIGHT once elected.

What a disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Here ya go Herseth. . I guess this is for you:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 26th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC