|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:04 PM Original message |
About that Greene thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzelle (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. he is certainly different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. From what I saw of Green, what he's going through is akin to abuse like in the movie "Carrie" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. See below... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. You are making more as many assumptions with your theory as the ones you question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzelle (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. He was pretty....uninspiring...to say the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:12 AM Response to Reply #20 |
34. True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Most of the non-politician filings in the California Recall were joke filings - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 04:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
41. That's why Greene was particularly selected for this charade... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. I like your theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
35. I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Hear, hear! Well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe they're using a new voting method/machine with this guy as a test run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Better Education? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. And then there is another theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Totally agree and said as much in different words above your post. Seems too obvious not to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Great minds think alike....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I had the "test run" thought as well. Post-Newt Gingrich politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MinM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why waste $10,000.00??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Plausible--sort of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. as dumb as this idea is....too bad some person couldn't rig the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. That's what I was suggesting in the last sentence of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. you'd see an investigation in that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Is Greene a Fool? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
39. I'm agreeing along your line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Probably a Perfect Storm of Various Factors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I would tend to agree except that there were "anomalies" in the machine data, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. It was mostly R's voting for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. It seems unlikely that many Republicans would vote in the Democratic primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. They wouldn't have to skip it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. It doesn't work that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mercuryblues (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 07:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. In SC open primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I already acknowledged that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:47 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. You are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. OK found it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:55 AM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Rawl won absentees... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 03:41 AM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Well, no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. It does not have to be that complicated. Get someone who is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. That is exactly what I think also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. It's not really risky and has nothing to do with voteing machines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David in Canada (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 04:00 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
44. Someone Gave Him $10,000 To File |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC