|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:35 PM Original message |
I have a whacky theory to explain all these earthquakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Alright, I thought about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes! Because plate tectonic movement is just like that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
113. Article: Climate change may trigger earthquakes and volcanoes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Mass is always conserved. Fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. See post #6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. Done. See reply to said post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. the location of the mass is changing from the ends to the middle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Therellas (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. The table was shaking not stirred.... heh! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TransitJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. My theory is that you just started paying attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I live in California. Give me a break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbieo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. I think when Yellowstone blows up, the "woo' will be on you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Booga-Booga. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. Brings out the pseudo-animist hippies and their theories about how mother earth hates humanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. lol at pseudo-animist hippies! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
124. Mother Earth no longer needs us.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. When in doubt, do research. Science says it's possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
39. Actually, it says the opposite: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. No, not the same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaSea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. Not that wacky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. "When the glaciers melt, the reliquified water causes sea levels to rise and increases the weight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. Again...wacky and wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
140. From the first link: "Small ocean changes can also influence volcanic eruptions," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. No. It is not plausible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. They don't need any explanation, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. Deleted message |
Hestia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. Maybe, but Full Moon SuperMoons do have something to do with earthquakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:00 PM Original message |
Astrology is idiocy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Astrology? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
67. People can be insulting, can't they, full of condescension, snobbery and ridicule? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Yes, rational thinkers can get snippy when we see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #70 |
136. Oh, I didn't jump to that conclusion, I was pushed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 06:51 PM Response to Reply #136 |
138. Perhaps I spend too much time reading threads in general discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Ben turned the wheel again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
17. possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. There was a thread around here, maybe early last week that got a lot of snark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Appreciated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
42. You mean the one where they guy thought it was caused by the space station? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. How about the large hadron collider... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Shhh....that's not supposed to come out for another week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Oooh! I like that one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Don't alarm people, please. It'll all be over soon, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. If only it were that fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. And now we know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. As long as it takes out Goldman Sachs & James Dobson with the rest of us, I'm all for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
22. I've read that there is something similar to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Direct quote from your link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. You should have read the next couple of sentences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Oh, jeez! Yes, your ONE sentence proves the rest of us wrong! How could I oversee that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
141. NASA says otherwise.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. That sounds better than "mutated nuetrinos". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I heard it was the "implanted neuticles." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xfundy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. No, no, no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
34. Well I'll one up your wacky theory with one presented by my friend today over the phone: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
35. It has been speculated in several major scientific journals, including Nature, that the stresses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
37. I'm in NO CA too and your idea doesn't sound outlandish at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. What about HAARP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is not how it works, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
43. Geologist's answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
45. I believe it's possible, the shifting of weight from melting mountain glaciers has some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. That's a subduction fault zone, dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. You've won my heart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. If there was less weight on the upper tectonic plate, would it go higher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. No...the relative densities of the plates are the key... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. So all things being equal, weight has 0 influence on how high the upper plate will lift? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. What makes you think the upper plate lifted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. I don't know that in any specific case that it did, my question is a general one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:21 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Generally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:35 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. I've never contended that the melting of glaciers could cause earthquakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. And thanks for a civil conversation about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. One final response and I'm out for the night, my unprecedented comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:53 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Peace! and thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Yes, that is correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. What you believe and what actially is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. How long has oil been in the planet's crust and does any of it seep down to the upper mantle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:28 PM Response to Reply #55 |
72. Oil has been in the crust for tens of millions of years or more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. So if the Earth were drained of oil would that effect the temperature and/or density of the crust? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:58 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Temperature, no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
49. Perhaps the opposite effect...the water weight from those glaciers have an effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Therellas (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. yes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
61. This is complicated stuff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #61 |
92. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
63. This OP illustrates how bad the science teaching in our schools has become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
94. This may be the dumbest post on the entire thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:47 PM Original message |
Dumbest post...for making an observation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
69. You're talking about a known phenomenon, Crustal Rebound. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
71. It is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. It is not possible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damyank913 (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
75. Don't know how true it is but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 10:52 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. That would only be concievable if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:03 AM Response to Reply #79 |
109. Cheers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #109 |
128. well...I'm sure you noticed I still got snippy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damyank913 (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #79 |
137. Snotty people notwithstanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 07:00 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. I think someone up or down-thread looked up the lunar phases and earthquakes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damyank913 (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. I don't think Lunar phases is what I'm looking for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:02 PM Response to Reply #75 |
82. The most powerful earthquake ever recorded (in Chile, 1960) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. And I'm sure you have all the data at your fingertips. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:12 PM Original message |
Find a lunar phase calculator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
102. No it isn't rocket whatever. It's too bad you don't get it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Yes, I know you say you're getting information from beyond. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:59 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Make fun. I don't give a crap. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:02 AM Response to Reply #104 |
107. You asked. I answered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:05 AM Response to Reply #107 |
110. I never brought up lunar phases. So since you did, the proof is in your lap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:12 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. I didn't bring them up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:17 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. You brought it up in the post I replied to. Amazing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:22 AM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Ahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:30 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. You keep bring in new elements into your strange little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #115 |
134. Well now there's the pot calling the kettle black. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. "Why is it that we never see all the sources of your assertions?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #87 |
100. I don't know how you got into this conversation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #100 |
105. Am I the mongoose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:03 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Pick a side. I don't care. I will be the other. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #100 |
131. Sure, because I went/am going to the University of South Florida for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #131 |
144. Jeez... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #75 |
88. Here are links to historic earthquakes and a moon phase calculator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comrade snarky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #75 |
99. Why do you think we bombed it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
83. Discover blog has said the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:07 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Chile isn't far from Antarctica, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #85 |
118. Honey. It's an entirely different continent. Look it up.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #118 |
120. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Yes, one blog connects the earthquake to the axis shift.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
101. I'm not doing my thesis on anything. I'm putting up stuff for people to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 11:25 AM Response to Reply #101 |
129. Oh, yes...I've wasted time at your links... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
89. Wouldn't it be possible for the tides to cause earthquakes as well then? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
90. I think we just fell behind Slovenia in scientific literacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #90 |
121. Oh we're way behind them. But just be grateful you don't live in Turkey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
91. 1671 views as of 8:31 PST. Not one recommendation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. There HAD to be at least one. My unrec would have canceled it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. A Dodger fan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. LOL. Yeah, and I've seen you posting about the Gnats in the Sports Forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #91 |
98. Because it's a dead stupid post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
name not needed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 03:13 AM Response to Reply #91 |
127. It's official. All of DU thinks you're an idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-03-10 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
96. All I know is the Pacific Region is 1 of 5 locations in the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
106. No theory is necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdp349 (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 07:28 PM Response to Reply #106 |
142. above is the only intelligent post in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
116. Timing could be due to full moon also! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #116 |
119. We've already disproven that one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
117. And you all laughed when I said bombing the moon would crack it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
122. Earthquakes are caused by subduction at the tectonic margins. Got nothing to do with the weight of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:31 AM Response to Reply #122 |
125. thank you. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
123. I think it's possible, but we'll need proof. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 11:29 AM Response to Reply #123 |
130. People rely too much on their gut... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #130 |
132. Yeah, I find the analogy of "a thin layer of ice on your car crushing the metal in the fenders" good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. Ok, curiosity is a great thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
126. There is about a .3 chance of a quake greater than an 8.0 each year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-04-10 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
135. First of all the Ring of Fire gets its name for a very good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 12th 2024, 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC