|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:40 PM Original message |
It's time to replace Sec of Defense Gates with General Wes Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. But will Our Blue Dog Masters approve? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They can go lie in the corner and lick themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Wrong, they call all the shots, not us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Clark is a good guy, but I prefer civilians being in control, as much as possible.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I tend to agree with your sentiment, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. There are lots of knowledgeable civilians with strong leadership qualities.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Wes Clark is a civilian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Idiotic quibbling over semantics aside, I very clearly said "civilians running the MILITARY"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Good God you're thin-skinned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 10:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. There are some limits at to the recycling of retired military back into Government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. I realize that my OP is not well written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Oct-02-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I disagree, if the Defense was not doing what the President wanted, then SecDef |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Do you think Gates had any decision in this.. The pukes found someone in the DOD, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. But he could squash it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. If Gates could squash it then so could Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Obama would do it through Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. It was rather late in breaking about the weasel around.. so, let's see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I know, I need to be "talked down" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. There's the govt and then there's the govt. DeMint is an idiot.. but who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. What a great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. DeMint sure seems to want to go to Nicaragua |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Ahh, a "hiking" date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. It's still the State Dept.s job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Something needs to happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. Gates has been a very pleasant surprise... I want him to stay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Is Gates in charge of the Pentagon or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. Has Clark been retired long enough now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omnibus
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You're right, it's 10 years, according to Wikipedia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. The point of the post wasn't whether or not it's Clark... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Then suggest a viable candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaneQPublic
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. If there wasn't a military coup during Clinton, then Obama has no fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stables2010
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
21. Ill Amen to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
28. How did State block him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Apparently congress receives travel approval through the State Dept. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud
![]() |
Thu Oct-01-09 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
33. Gates is doing a stellar job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC