Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hannity's show- "Palin is threatening because she is beautful and has a family...new feminist"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:35 AM
Original message
Hannity's show- "Palin is threatening because she is beautful and has a family...new feminist"
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 11:36 AM by Beaverhausen
I had to check in to Faux last night and could only stomach a minute or two of the fill-in Hannity host (some blonde I'd never seen before) discussing Palin.

She asked a black female panelist "Why is Sarah so threatening?"
The answer was "She is beautiful, she has a family, a husband who supports her..."
Then the male panelist said "she is a new feminist, and the older feminists don't like it."

It was all I could stand. Did anyone else catch this?

This is what repukes think about her and why we don't like her.

Are they truly that out of touch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sarah Palin is a Titanic figure in Republican politics n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. And then she saw and hit an iceberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Does it really have to be spelled out?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL
I'm an aspie, it's hard not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm glad you got the message!
That's the important point.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
54. LOL, this Aspie thought the same thing!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-05-09 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
144. They are really hopeless.
I don't really see how one can reason with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. "she is a new feminist, and the older feminists don't like it."
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 11:41 AM by YOY
Yeah...I'd turn it off at that point too.

Sweet Jebus Cripes. It's like they try and redefine everything to fit some kind of insult pattern.

THey made Liberal a dirty word. Socialism was easy. Feminist too. As tough as that was...so they put a spin and say that the quintessential anti-feminist is a "new feminist".

If Todd was a good father...then his daughter would not only have better taste in men but a little more self respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. "they put a spin and say that the quintessential anti-feminist is a "new feminist""
well put

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her 'beauty' (only skin deep) is what kept her in the public eye this long!
If she has an asset, that's the only one. And in time that will go away too and then she'll be 100% ugly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. She's a "new feminist" in the same way that a wheelbarrow is the "new transportation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TokenQueer Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. !
:rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. or, the republican feminist
pardon me while i shake my finger in your face while telling you to practice abstinance, just say no. yet if me or mine gets knocked up, we will have all options on the table.

excuse me, i need to go shoot some wildlife from a helicopter...

you'd almost think i had a penis, wouldn't you? well i don't. but if i DID, it would be HUGH!1!1! seriesly!1!1! i'm a manly woman.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
87. !!! NAILED it!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
111. She doesn't need a penis
She's got guns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
142. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ducks quack, geese honk.
Besides making sense to other ducks and geese, it's just noise to the rest of the world.

Faux Noise: "Quack, quackquack, honk honk, quack."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. That thar Sarah is sure pirdy and she got a whole mess o' kids and a right hansum husband...
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 11:41 AM by Mrs. Overall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. So . . . "old" feminists" were ugly and asexual?
What kind of logic is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. It's the old Rush Limbaugh meme.
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 11:52 AM by Buzz Clik
"feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. 'Scuze me, gotta go find my Gloria Steinem hat.
If "New Feminists" believe in banning all types of family planning, and cheerlead for all forms of warmongering, dish me up some of that Old-Timey Equal Rights stuff, pleez.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. She isn't beautiful. She's pretty. And WHY must EVERYTHING be about men's dicks!?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Ummm
"She asked a black female panelist "Why is Sarah so threatening?"
The answer was "She is beautiful, she has a family, a husband who supports her..."

You think the "black female panelist" was talking about men's dicks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:54 AM
Original message
How is her physical appearance germaine to the tasks at hand? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't think it is all about men's dicks
A lot of women sit around and discuss female politicians clothes, hair and crap. They do it with Michelle Obama all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Many women aren't in the habit of focusing on the best ways to get at men's dicks?
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 12:14 PM by patrice
It's called "influence." And this is the standard route to it when you either don't know of or refuse to use a more direct and honest approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Um, yes.
It's called internalizing societal constructs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Ummm ok
So it is all about men's dicks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
59. it's about a power structure and the aforementioned social constructs, inc. female appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
95. So it is all about men's dicks.
What a relief. I was starting to thing it was about women's dicks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. because they have them
Come'on patrice, get with the program. If you had one of those pointing all over the place, with a mind of its own, waking up at odd times like a new baby, tripping you when you tried to walk and making you sit funny, you'd be pretty preoccupied with it, too!!! It takes practice to spell your name when you pee....

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. lol - shallow as they are unintelligent
Their parents should be shot for creating such evil-hearted children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. "she is a new feminist"
If by "new feminist" the panelist meant "misogynist," I agree completely. Somehow I don't think that's what he meant, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. This is the second time I've heard Palin referred to as "misogynist." What does that mean?
Can women be misogynist? I suppose, but is Palin?

Don't think I agree. She isn't a feminist, but there's a lot of territory between "not feminist" and "misogynist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. There is a line of thought amongst the older Feminists I know that says something like, "Women
who conceive of Woman-hood primarily in terms of or essentially related to Men and resist, deny, or oppress anything that does not fall within that paradigm are Mysogynistic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. P.S. One of the problems here is that even "that which does not fall within the male paradigm"
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 01:30 PM by patrice
can/should NOT be "that which is NOT-MALE" in order to be truly of Wymyn. I must be its own thing, not of or related to maleness.

This doesn't mean that there isn't anything about Women that is not of or related to Men, just that there are SOME things of or related to Woman-hood that are not of or related to Men in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #52
136. P.P.S. This would, of course, make Misanthropy, as an essential characteristic of Feminism,
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 07:22 PM by patrice
ANTI-Feministic, because detesting Men is of or related to Men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. She is NOT threatening. She's unqualified to lead.
The left is swimming is powerful, beautfiul women who have supportive husbands and lovely families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. She's a sneering liar and trouble maker. People want to see her get her
comeuppance. Why do they confuse that with threatening? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
65. Good points. Although her insanity is threatening.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. More like terrifying, particularly when considering her bid for the VP and maybe Prez.
We barely survived the Bush presidency. Can we handle someone with less leadership but similar intellectual punch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
86. It seems there are more of this sort of "politician" coming down the pike, too.
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 01:59 PM by omega minimo
That's :scared:

What I don't understand is how unqualified, stupid people can have delusions of grandeur and narcissistic egos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm sure liberals tricked her into the whole alleged embezzlement thing
Maybe even Communists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. Only the Right thinks she is "threatening"
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 11:57 AM by sutz12
Most of the left are a bit concerned that with her out of the race, the Right might find someone to run who seems more capable and electable.

They're the ones "threatened" by powerful women. Palin is not powerful. She's Bush in a skirt, clueless and eminently qualified to play the figurehead. She talks like a spokesmodel because that is what she is. It is hardly anti-feminist to point out her lack of qualifications. It is patriotic to do so, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Maybe not such a good figurehead, though
Notice that many of the worst attacks have come from other Republicans--rivals in Alaska, members of McCain's campaign.

She's certainly as dumb and as egotistical and as mean as Bush. The problem seems to be that she won't just wave and wear costumes and be happy to play president (or governor). She insists on injecting her batshit ideas into everything and trying to run the show, even when she's a 2nd banana. Hence all the attacks by Republicans who had to work with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. I suppose....she's like an evil version of "Dave"
Wants to make a "difference."

Still one of my favorite political movies.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. Because she has a Divine buddie, like George. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. Feminazi Lite



... is probably how OxyRush would describe it.

Limbaugh has no use for women other than how they can advance his conservative ideology.

Like anything else, he will use women to whatever extent he possibly can.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. right wing co-opting religion, country and no feminism
they try to deliberately co-opt good things to bring it all down to their pathetic level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sarah Palin is the OPPOSITE of "threatening"
She's someone you can only point at and laugh. And occasionally pity.

And she doesn't have the depth to be ANY kind of "symbol".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wow. A total slap in the face to those of us women, who for whatever reason,
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 12:10 PM by kestrel91316
don't have a "family" or husband, and who aren't "beautiful".

I'm just an ugly old spinster crone. Should I kill myself now or next week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Oh by all means wait...
Wait for a good long time.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Right On! kestrel! - But don't do that!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
62. Lol, scared ya!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
103. In the same breath they insulted responsible men.
If the grunting redneck snowmachine man is a good father then I'm Huey Lewis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #103
113. Don't you mean
YOY Lewis? :hi:



I feel sorry for the kids. What a messed up situation. Missed the insult but endorse and shout out to "responsible men"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. I agree - she's a threat to feminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. The worst kind, because all of those women who have internalized The Oppressor will identify with
her, thinking she is the opposite of The Oppressor, because she tells them she is.

BTW, Huckabee is the male corelate of this same role.

Their appeal to the warped side of Populism is a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #44
68. the "Oppressor"????
Gawd.

Sarah Palin is no feminist, but I am getting mighty sick of the "victim" feminists in our own party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. No Victim here, because one needs to recognize Oppression in all of its guises, in order to Free
one's self from it. And one of the most insidous forms of oppression is how one identifies with oppressive values, perhaps, even to the point that identifying them publicly is characterized as being a victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. "perhaps, even to the point that identifying them publicly is characterized as being a victim."
:eyes: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. Thanks OM! Note the "perhaps" I like to leave it up to the message receiver.
It's often interesting to see what posters do with that.

:hi: I add my voice to Freedom lovers everywhere, Happy 4th of July, omega minimo! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #79
88. noted and included!
Happy 4th of July, patrice. :party: :woohoo: like my new :patriot: sigline? :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #88
99. Indeed! I was thinking about complimenting you on it, but got distracted with various
trends in this thread.

We must Never! Forget! what The Constitution is to TPB. The damage to The Constitution is Victory for Osama bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #71
92. oops wrong place
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 02:05 PM by woo me with science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #71
93. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. Happy Fourth of July
:toast: :spray: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. Just because you're not familiar with a concept or study
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 01:39 PM by omega minimo
doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Don't be a victim of ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #73
90. Oh, I'm more familiar than you think.
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 02:10 PM by woo me with science
I am well-acquainted with the professional victim industry. In fact, I help others identify them on a semi-professional basis, in order to help keep your insurance costs down.

No need to thank me for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #90
94. So your "semi professional basis" inhibits your ability to understand what patrice was talking about
Then you take a swipe at other DUers as a result.

No need to thank you for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. Nice to see you, OM.
You never disappoint me. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. Likewise, I'm sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
70. Also though
this stems from the Madonna School of Feminism and Celebrity Style.

Women being encouraged to exploit themselves to adhere to old, traditional, male gaze standards of attractiveness/behavior and call it feminism because they "chose to be exploited" or "exploited themselves before anyone else did." That flaky, superficial view of feminism became big in the 90's. And it's been coopted.

In fact, Crazy Camille Paglia promoted that heavily -- she and Nutty Sarah would probably get along great. They could ride motorcycles and shoot large mammals together. "I love the smell of cigars and liberation in the morning........."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. LOL! Cigars! "Let's show the Men how free we are, that we are their peers, by out Menning the Men!"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Hey baby,
Love how these waders slide against my freshly shaven legs....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #70
122. Also known as "do-me feminism"
As in: "I'm a feminist who has no problem with bein' hot and sexy, so look out for me, 'cuz if I come hobbling along in eight-inch stilettos, it's cuz I WANT to wear 'em and cripple my feet, not 'cuz some MAN told me to. If I wanna pose in Playboy with my stuff all on display for the world, that's 'cuz I'm an attractive female proud of my powerful body and my sexuality, not 'cuz some guy will be turned on by lookin' at me."

*yawn* Same old sexism, only dolled up as "women's freedom and sexual autonomy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. So out of touch with things...ain't that the truth
Freepers are so insidiously stupid, they really think the libs feel "threatened"? They are confusing it with feeling "Contempt". Freeping idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
75. "Contempt"? Is that what you feel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #75
143. For Palin.?.I'd say yes
Certainly no feelings of threat as has been espoused by freepers, that's for sure.

I feel contempt for her hypocrisy, for her 'moral' outrage, for her assumption that she represents all women, that she dare compare herself to Hillary, that she feels she can lead this nation. Yeah, I'd say I feel contempt and not any sort of threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
81. Contempt is a form of bondage. Libs, i.e. those who are Liberated, do not identify with bondage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #81
106. Waders are a form of bondage
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm not surprised by this at all. We have this same problem on the liberal side..
With the so-called "sex positive" crowd telling us how "empowering" stripping and porn are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Usually, it's a very juvenile form of pseudo-rebellion. Popular because it IS the coin-of-the-realm.
It "rebels" without actually Rebelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yep.
And it's not really subversive if everyone is doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Right! Just like "Let's all be 'Hippies'!" by wearing Hippie clothes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
80. echoed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. It's astounding how....
Republican support for feminism and opposition to sexism began in 2008 with Sarah Palin's candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
41. Every day is Opposite Day on Fox.
They call Palin a feminist because she's not. She's an anti-feminist in matters of policy--though I won't minimize the fact of her "success," such as it is, as a possible inspiration to women. On the balance, I believe she's a setback to the cause of equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
77. She's a Fauxminist.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #77
84. Love it! I'm gonna use that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Thank you. We need to Fight Faux With Faux.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. Palin's view are old and not worth anything any more.
That's why they forced her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
43. Well that explains why she had to quit then!
It's all those jealous women's fault! Ya! Ya betcha there now also too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. palin is an ugly piece of shit
who can't finish her commitments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. Republicans are now claiming they are feminists?
:spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
56. That beotch is NOT a feminist!!
She does not care on bit about the rights of women. BTW....She is not beautiful either. She looks like the wicked witch of the north.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
57. I wonder if feminists will fight for their name, or if they'll let these fucks take it...
It took us like 20 years to get "liberal" back - sorta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Real feminists don't fight with Hannity.
Because it would be a waste of valuable time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Heh. If anyone wants to know how the loss of a name starts, they can consult these posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. So the word matters more than the idea?
Maybe some think that Hannity is a visionary trend setter, but I don't. The only people listening to him are already converted. And yes, they are all waste of time and breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Where did I say, suggest, or imply that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. Read your own posts
"Heh. If anyone wants to know how the loss of a name starts, they can consult these posts."

If Hannity wants to usurp the word 'feminist' why should anyone stop him? He's perfectly entitled to be stupid and say stupid things. You seem to be implying that if we don't fight with him he's going to take something away from us. I'm saying that fighting him is a waste of time and effort and that he can't take the idea of feminism away from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #63
101. A waste of time with Hannity, but there are Many Listeners/Watchers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #101
104. I think the Hannity listeners and watchers are just like him only dumber
Except for those who go there for the fun of watching the idiots and come back to report on them. The ones who watch to laugh at Hannity are mostly already feminists (men as well as women). As a very active feminist in my youth I can assure anyone who wonders that things have improved vastly since then. There's still work to do regarding salaries, but women have mostly gone into just about any career they want to now with little to no resistance. I'm not worried that Hannity's use of the word feminist will corrupt anything. Just like Limbaugh's use of his word feminazies isn't either. It says much more about them than it does any woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #104
115. Nothing has changed in regard to the image/expectation/male gaze/indoctrination
That was part of the message sent by InsHannity -- "she's beautiful," blah blah blah.

One big indicator of how that's been internallized and how -- in a sense you're right and in a sense it's completely untrue -- it stiill has its hooks in people is this:

Yes women have different opportunities. Yet the expectations on appearance/behavior have not improved and have been REGRESSED.

The point: all these young women who are educated, liberated, independent, what have you, who are speaking in that pained, nasally, gargle-ly, phony, strangulated vocalization that you hear EVERYWHERE and is transmitted by TV (and, I'm told, Ivy League colleges) are telling the world:

"I'm harmless, I'm subservient, I'm voiceless, I'm docile, I'm a little girl talking baby talk."


It's sick. And it goes with the trendy/conventional appearance of 90210/Sex and the City Fauxminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #115
116. Women's looks are not pushed in academia
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 05:07 PM by lunatica
Universities and academia in general which includes world class research groups is one place where women have made huge inroads and are even outnumbering men. I know Deans and Vice Chancellors who are women and UC Davis has a woman Chancellor. The graduate students in what has been traditionally male areas of expertise like Engineering and Statistics and Math and Paleontology and the Biological sciences where I work has about equal amounts of women and men, and there is no demand that the women look better or dress well or act ladylike or wear lipstick or pretend to be dumb little girls. There is no sexism or misogyny that I've ever detected in all the years I've worked there.

And one other thing I've noticed is that really beautiful women who could easily trade on their looks are faculty and graduate students in science and engineering. And a sizable group of these women are from other countries. China, Korea, Latin America, Australia and the Middle East, Palestine and Israel and other countries. And strangely enough there is almost no conflict between the many countries' citizens no matter what goes on back home for women or men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. That's not what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. Odd that you should pick such a narrow band to characterize the average situation which i think HAS
regressed.

Looks are more important than ever outside of the ivory tower. As a woman, try interacting with a new group of professional peers without your makeup and hair done. Go and try to advocate in a grassroots issue gathering without appropriate badges of group membership. Show up for an interview clean, but overweight, with no makeup, no hair do, wearing outdated clothes, and a schmooze factor of 0 and see how well you do competing with another prettier candidate of the same age with nearly the same or somewhat lesser qualifications and a better fashion sense.

Maybe even some of the increase in obesity in this country can be attributed (amongst other things) to anger over the tyranny of how we're supposed to look. And then, of course, there also are anorexic and bulimic symptomatic obsessions with body image, which some posit assume the proportions they do because persons lack subjective identification with other values.

The cosmetics industry will be interested to hear from you that they are obsolete, especially relative to the 100s of millions of $ that they generate every year for stuff that you can't eat, that won't keep you warm in the winter, nor carry your butt from here to there, nor cure your headache.

As people become more confused by changes, they often cling more tightly to things they know and are familiar with and the rules about what is attractive and what isn't are pretty clear that way, so this is a simple universal means of social bonding and, hence, re-assurance. Ever watch QVC?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #118
120. Excuse me. I thought we were exchanging ideas
I did not refute what was said. I was not arguing against your ideas or experiences. I was adding mine to the mix.

Sorry you feel so offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #120
124. I'm not offended, just making my case, and puzzled by you sample. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #120
127. P.S. Sorry I appeared offended.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #127
132. you didn't
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #127
138. I was talking about what I know. I work at UC Berkeley
And I'm sure you probably were too. But saying that I should inform the makeup industry that they're obsolete is sarcasm as far as I can tell. It sounds angry so I assumed you thought I was arguing against what you were saying. I get it that it isn't easy for women in the workplace. That's one of the main reasons I decided to work at the University. It isn't the corporate world with it's indifference to quality work and it's biases to looks when hiring people.

I misunderstood then. I'm glad you weren't offended.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. I was being funny. I'm not in the habit of using emoticons everywhere. What we need is new
and more punctuation on the keyboard.

If I had said that at a meeting, you would have seen a smile on my face and my tone of voice would have contained no ridicule and, yes, I do have those abilities, acquired from teaching highschool seniors, including AP students, for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anneboleyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-05-09 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #116
146. Wow, my experience in the humanities was entirely different than yours.
In both grad school and when I professed at a liberal arts college. Very different, subtle but still very much present expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anneboleyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-05-09 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #146
147. I should add that perhaps the behavior of male colleagues differs in the sciences
but there are certainly still issues in the humanities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #115
123. Think of the CONSTANT cultural references to looks.
Not only in words, but also in images. Movies and TV are great examples of how pretty = lovable. We may know little or nothing else about a character, not what she thinks, feels, not what she knows, how she understands herself, or the world, NOTHING, but if she's beautiful or pretty it IS absolutely un-contested to present her as inspiration for true love on that one quality alone.

Think of all of the verbal references to what a fine person so-and-so is based on little or NO information about them other than how good-looking she is.

She's pretty, she must be good! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #123
129. Looks as a preoccupation and all the time/money/focus/attention it requires
The same old cliches are telegraphed as soon as kids are born. There are differences b/w boys and girls -- that are not written in stone.

They are wallpapered into everyone's consciousness, though. A good, clear graphic example of this is easy to find. Any Sunday newspaper supplement Toy ads catalogue to kids. It's right there, in pink and blue.

Boys = active

Giels = passive

Boys = outward

Girls = domestic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #104
119. Rather static notion of all of the systems involved in that situation you have there.
This is about waaaaaay more than what careers women can get into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #57
82. They don't get Feminism. They get Fauxminism.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
58. A lot of feminists have families
Nice theory though, Faux dudes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. 'New Feminist" BWAHAHAHA!!! what a load of crap.
:rofl: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
61. That would be a Fauxminist
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 01:08 PM by omega minimo
:hi: They are talking nonsense, typical for Faux Nooz. If that's their definition, call it what it is. Fauxminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
83. Sean Hannity is just another one of Sarah's wannabe buttboys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #83
105. He has had the hots for Sarah for a long long time,
I bet he gets a tingle down his leg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #105
107. It seems he's a wannabe Sarah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. I disagre, I think he's a wanna "something else" Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #108
110. He wants to be a girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. I never got that impression from him. I think he's a normal dumb
male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
85. And since we're dsicussing feminism
did the fill in "(some blonde I'd never seen before)" happen to be a woman?

Is "(some blonde I'd never seen before)" how you would describe a man who filled in?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
91. Palin? "Threatening"?
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 02:05 PM by johnaries
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
100. Threatening?
Only to her own political party. What the hell kind of drugs are these people indulging in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
102. Ya, but she is illterate..cant read a newspaper.. one time Gov
from a low population State... and knows NOTHING about world politics.

In short.. the PERFECT candidate for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
109. She's a threat because she's insane.
Narcissistic as hell, and very unstable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #109
137. Had she been a good orator she would have been extremely dangerous.
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 07:26 PM by Hansel
I can't believe how the sheeple fell for her. Imagine if she had been able to put a complete sentence together and in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
114. Old feminists burned bras. What do new feminists burn, apart from stock options?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #114
125. Actually, nobody ever burned bras. Just threw 'em away. Some people, anyway.
Some of us would rather not bounce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. and they don't burn very well without an accellerant. nt
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 07:02 PM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #128
133. do you know if that ever happened?
Hasn't it been told as folklore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #133
139. I've never seen it. I did see some Wymyn who were walking the railroad
tracks from the Pentax plants near Amarillo (I think) to the nuclear sub bases up around Seattle, who had hair all of the way up their legs as long and curly as any guy's. It was during the summer and they were on the road following weapons trains, no men in their group, though there were Mennonite and other families along the route that helped them out.

My older sister, with whom I am very close, worked for a large YWCA for years and some of the most progressive political women in our area networked there. None of them burnt bras. They just did stuff, like welcoming the Plow Shares women who were walking the train tracks. I helped; we all marched down Kansas Avenue in Topeka, over 20 years ago now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
121. Answer: yes, they are that out of touch.
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 06:43 PM by Berry Cool
Sarah Palin is to feminism as Uncle Tom is to civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
126. Obama wiped the floor with McCain Palin
A Palin run would result in Obama winning 46 states.

Nobody "fears" Palin. Although it is comical that the far right wing lunatics think people do. Send her to North Carolina again. Please!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #126
130. I am truly sorry to see her go as a candidate, but expect to see her around
as a sheep tender preparatory to one of their standard bait-and-switch operations, the sort of thing they've been using to milk the "Pro-Lifers" for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
131. If by "new feminist" he means "notta feminist"
Edited on Sat Jul-04-09 07:20 PM by Hansel
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't particularly find her to be beautiful, either physically or in character. She lacks class, is manipulative, and refuses to take responsibility for anything. Not really what I consider to be beautiful.

Using sexual allures to gain position and money, using your family as props to achieve power, and pretending that someone said something bad about your disabled child as an excuse for quitting your post instead of admitting it is because you have violated ethics and possibly the law is not feminism. It's gutless manipulation and is not something any female should aspire to.

Are these people really that clueless and shallow? Wait...never mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #131
134. Spot on
and funny :spray:

"Are these people really that clueless and shallow? Wait...never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #131
141. The night SP winked, the entire room of women and men I was with exploded.
It's STILL hard to believe that someone in that position, during a debate!!!, would so overtly send that "Ain't I sexy and cute" message. That wink said "I'm the kind of woman you can't trust your boyfriend around." It also said, as winks almost universally do, "Something ***OTHER*** than what my words to you are is going on here." Everyone in the room was completely amazed by the bald sexiness of it. Sarah needs everything to be about Sarah and she'll do ANYTHNG to make that happen, including something as dumb as that wink.

Sad part of it is that that wink totally worked for a significant minority of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
135. they thought george w bush was a real president
'nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-05-09 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
145. Yeah. Sarah is a feminist like I'm an astronaut.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC