Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Operation Rescue's senior policy adviser's phone number found inside Roeder's car

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:23 PM
Original message
Operation Rescue's senior policy adviser's phone number found inside Roeder's car

http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/2009/06/inside_the_car_of_the.php

Phone number found inside car of man suspected of killing George Tiller belongs to woman who plotted 1988 clinic bombing

KMBC Channel 9 captured this shot of a phone number to anti-abortion group Operation Rescue inside the car of Scott Roeder, the man suspected of shooting and killing Wichita abortion doctor George Tiller Sunday morning at a Wichita church.



The phone number is written on an envelope with the name "Cheryl" and "Op Rescue." Cheryl is Cheryl Sullenger, Operation Rescue's senior policy adviser, who in 1988 was convicted of conspiring to bomb a California abortion clinic. She served two years in prison.

Sullenger tells The Pitch that she hasn't spoken with Roeder recently.

"No, he hasn't called me recently," Sullenger said. "No."

She went on: "You know, he's somebody who's been around. My name is on the Internet. It's on every press release. My phone number is on every press release it. It's all over the internet. I don't know. he probably has lots of people's phone numbers. You know? So I don't know. I don't have any more comment other than that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. No we didn't talk about him killing Dr Tiller so stop saying that!
:grr:

You can bet your ass she's smiling at this in private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Use the Patriot Act
If Obama and Holder don't shut this group down, then there will be justification in calling them soft on terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I fully support your sentiment and wish you'd start an OP about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like the evidece wasn't guarded particularly well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:26 PM
Original message
Operation Rescue = Terrorist Cell
Shut 'em down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let us see how dumb these people are
His cell phone records are carefully being gone through. There will be a warrant for theirs.

Lets hope the useful idiot they recruited was too stupid to toss the disposable cell phone after the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. ruh roh, shaggy .... the water is approaching 212 degrees farenheit over at Op Rescue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I want to see Roeder's phone log and Operation Rescue's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Perfect. Keep the evidence coming in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. She says he has not called her recently
So he has called her before. Not sure why she would say that and then discuss that her phone number is all over the internet and news then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. I wonder if she called him recently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. OH! And what about her using the weasel word "recently"? Agent Mike needs to visit her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. A review of phone records should be able to ascertain the truth.
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 12:29 PM by dgibby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. interesting.....
He hasn't called her 'recently' - but Operation Rescue claims he isn't a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. thank you very much for pointing out the inconsistency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. "No, he hasn't called me RECENTLY," Sullenger said. "No."
"No, he hasn't called me recently," Sullenger said. "No."

Check. Mate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. what a ridiculous queef
is there a photo up of this asshammer yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. If Operation Rescue doesn't have a problem claiming Cheryl Sullenger as their own,
why would they have a problem with claiming Sott Roeder as their own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. If she works for Operation Rescue and has communicated with Roeder... how can OR claim he isn't
to some extent a contributor or member?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Because they could be complicit in murder
RICO could apply.

This is a terrorist organization with one intent, to block women from receiving legal medical care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. This does start to look like a bit of terrorism and coordination, in cell-like fashion, doesn't it?
I hope "Cheryl" realizes that the police can check if this clown actually has called her "recently."

And what's "recently" anyway? In the last ten minutes? Ten hours? Ten days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Define "recently."
So he called, right? Just not yesterday?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Exactly what I was thinking, too
"Recently" is a rather relative term, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. See how peaceful O.R. is? Their senior policy adviser is convicted of bombing conspiracy.
Really peaceful, that group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. They're terrorists
I won't mince words about these evil fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks to Bush/Cheney criminal acts - the conversation is stored in a NSA
computer somewhere

Bet they never thought of that while proclaiming them the Greatest President yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oops, that's gonna leave a mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. That OR has a person convicted of conspiracy to bomb a clinic as their "senior policy adviser"
speaks volumes. Their protestations about not advocating or supporting violence sure looks like bullsh** especially when they have a person with her history in a top position in their organization.

If Operation Rescue were serious about not advocating violence they would run the other way from a person like Cheryl Sullenger, not make her a "senior policy adviser".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. And...
This would be enough to start shipping people to Gitmo if we were the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. Acted ALONE? Methinks that the FBI need to dig deeper. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 31st 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC