Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Want something new to complain about re: Obama? He used lincoln's bible, a snub to American Indians?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 12:48 AM
Original message
Want something new to complain about re: Obama? He used lincoln's bible, a snub to American Indians?
Text of Order to General Sibley, St. Paul Minnesota:

"Ordered that of the Indians and Half-breeds sentenced to be hanged by the military commission, composed of Colonel Crooks, Lt. Colonel Marshall, Captain Grant, Captain Bailey, and Lieutenant Olin, and lately sitting in Minnesota, you cause to be executed on Friday the nineteenth day of December, instant, the following names, to wit ...
The other condemned prisoners you will hold subject to further orders, taking care that they neither escape, nor are subjected to any unlawful violence.
Abraham Lincoln,
President of the United States"

Lincoln's approval of the largest mass execution in American history. Image from The Dakota Conflict Trials of 1862.

http://campus.lakeforest.edu/~ebner/mackiag/lincoln.html

Similar atrocities occurred all through the Lincoln Administration. In 1862, the Santee Sioux of Minnesota grew tired of waiting for the 1.4 million dollars they had been promised for the sale of 24 million acres of land to the federal government in 1851. Appeals to President Lincoln fell on deaf ears. What made this even more egregious to the Sioux was the invasion of this yet unpaid for land by thousands of white settlers. Then, with a very poor crop in august of 1862, many of the Indians were hungry and facing starvation with the upcoming winter.

When Lincoln outright refused to pay the owed money, remember he had a war to finance the Indians revolted. Lincoln assigned General John Pope to quell the uprising and he announced at the beginning of his campaign: "It is my purpose to utterly exterminate the Sioux. They are to be treated as maniacs or wild beasts, and by no means as people with whom treaties or compromise can be made." Lincoln certainly did not challenge this statement.

http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/issues/lincoln.html


Just predicting the future of talk radio this week and rw sites. You heard it here first. Of course they won't seem to point out that it was a republican who did the above...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans don't give a shit about history
Unless it involves a Democrat inserting part of his body into another person's body over a decade ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hear neurotic Asian men have taken to streets to protest Obama.
With the chant "hell no, we won't mellow."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. After the uprising was quelled
about a thousand Santee were held by the Army. The origianl plan was to execute them all. Lincoln said no and insisted that only the principals face execution. That number was 38 Santee Lakota. The Santee were expelled from Minnesota to the Dakota territory. OBTW, the estimated number of whites killed range from 300 to 800.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I do think Obama could have had a Native elder as part of the inauguration
I mean, it would have been meaningful.

From what I saw -- and I was not able to see much due to work -- there were people of all colors and faiths playing prominent roles in the ceremony, except... not one American Indian.

What's up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sagetea Donating Member (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well they were there
They actually had an all nations pow-wow in DC Jan 19, also had their own "ball".
but I do agree it would have been very meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hope I live long enough
to see a Native American become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Maybe 2016
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun 06th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC