|
I can only look back at some of JFK's choices, since I was 4 years old when he ran for president, and was in the 2nd grade when he was assassinated. Of course, there wasn't the 24/7 "news" (propaganda) cycle that we have had for the last four or five presidents, but were JFK's picks considered controversial at the time?
some of JFK's cabinet choices:
Dean Rusk; Secretary of State. Career diplomat, given most of the credit or blame for dividing up Korea and pushing for war, then pushing for a longterm presence there.
C. Douglas Dillon; Treasury Secretary. On top of being a Wall Street investment banker (sound familiar?) and a close personal friend of the Rockefellers, Dillon was also a Republican.
Robert McNamara; Secretary of Defense. Ex-president of Ford Motor Company, McNamara was wholly unqualified to be Secetary of Defense. We all know his influence, concerning Vietnam.
So, I'm just thinking out loud, because although I'm not happy with some of Obama's choices, I feel it necessary to give the man a chance. It's strange to be discussing so much of a man who hasn't stepped foot into office yet, hasn't officially unfurled his agenda yet, and all we have to go by are his choices for cabinet and staff.
Kennedy appointed a Wall Street republican. Was much made about that?
Was there any emphasis about the "career politician" "beltway insider" tag back then, anywhere like there is today?
Dean Rusk was a career politician and a beltway insider. Was much made about Kennedy choosing him for Secretary of State? Was Rusk a controversial figure back then, or just recently?
Anyone who remembers any of this first hand please let us know what it was like back then. I'm thinking if those same choices were made in todays environment, we'd be screaming for Kennedy's head.
|