Riddle Me This... (Warning --- Rant Alert)

[QueenOfCalifornia]

Tell me I am not imagining this.

I like to check out Freepervania from time to time. It's a twisted desire to get inside the workings of the neocon mind.

What is up with that website? It's like syphilitic, troglodytic, neanderthals put that site together while they were mainlining meth and drinking Night Train.

It is impossible to navigate. The software has to be the crappiest shit money can buy. I defy you guys to go over there and follow a thread - it is not possible. Answers to posts within threads appear pages away from each other... Names are hard to find - they hide them at the bottom of the post. It is so fucked up... Just like the asshats who post their insane "theories" over there... BTW... They are still all goofy about the birth certificate. :wtf:

:rant:

[rurallib]

1. you go there you are on your own.

You expect logically laid out site from folks who cheer Bush & Cheney?

[QueenOfCalifornia]

3. I just expect

that they would make a site that people can use - something made in the last 5 years. That software has to be 10 years old.

But I do understand your point. :)

[ogneopasno]

2. I hate using that photo. I hate making fun of human beings like that.

[QueenOfCalifornia]

6. Well it is

unfair to the guys who look like that to assume they are Freepers.

[ogneopasno]

11. You know what I'm saying and I object to your flippancy.

[QueenOfCalifornia]

15. Look

I am sorry that you have been offended - If I remove the picture now, I will be accused of changing an original post - I have been down that road before.

[Kalyke]

10. Me, too.

Especially since those people probably have Crouzon syndrome or some other disease that causes acrocephalopolysyndactyly.

[charlie]

4. "...neanderthals put that site together..."

It's home-rolled. JimRob, in addition to being a shit coder, is reeeeally tight with a nickel.

[QueenOfCalifornia]

7. It's the kind of

crap on a disc that I would use for target practice... If I was going to shoot at something.

[YOY]

5. They're not Neocons Gilligan.

They're the people who actually STILL believe what Neocons tell them. "Syphilitic troglodytic neanderthals" would be a very astute observation. More gullible than the first crop of Mormons would be a good descriptor as well.

[northofdenali]

8. Either you're braver than I am, friend -

or dumber!!!

I won't go to that site for any reason, and those who post excerpts from it usually wind up on my "skip" list (I "ignore" no one, have never put anyone on that list).

ICK!

I confess. I went once, in 2002, just to "see". It took about 30 seconds to figure out that (a) no, I didn't want to be there and (b) these people need serious mental health intervention.

ICK

:puke:

If they'd been given a modicum of intelligent (?) schooling in their earlier lives, they might have grown up to be...........

Bush.

[NV Whino]

9. I can't even follow the threads that are cut and pasted here

I think that the cut and paste jobs attempt to make some sense out of them, but I still can't follow them.

[madokie]

12. Off topic but where do I remember seeing these two in your sig line before from?

Its been bugging me

[Poiuyt]

13. Not everyone needs sophisticated web design

[RoadRage]

14. Honestly.. I go to Hannity...

The freaks are of the same breed (although surprisingly there are a few lefties over there who walk the minefield well and haven't yet been banned). But, the site is obviously paid for by the best Republican money can buy (Hannity & Rush). You can get teh RW scoop of the day - but you don't have to jab yourself in the eye with a dull knife afterwards just to stop the pain in your head like you do on Freeperville.

I just read though.. i've been banned 4 times. I'm not sure what I did the first time.. but I get kicked for "Retread" about 20 posts in everytime now, so i've sort of given up. Until I read something and get ticked.. and create a troll name just to see how long I can last. I have competitive issues I guess. :)