Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SF Chronicle bans 'progressive', will use 'far left' or 'ultra liberal' instead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:43 AM
Original message
SF Chronicle bans 'progressive', will use 'far left' or 'ultra liberal' instead
Source: San Francisco Bay Guardian

Audrey Cooper, assistant metro editor of the Chronicle/Hearst, has admitted that the Chronicle "has decided to stop using the word 'progressive' to describe the more liberal of San Francisco's political factions."

... Here's the email Cooper sent me this afternoon responding to questions from the Bruce blog and the Guardian.

... We decided to stop using the word 'progressive' to describe the more liberal of San Francisco's political factions because it is a politically loaded term that doesn't mean much to our readers. And while 'progressive' may be the preferred term of some politicians — and, of course, they are free to use it to describe themselves — it doesn't describe where they sit on the traditional political spectrum.

We believe using adjectives such as 'far left' and 'ultra liberal' more accurately describe city politicians and policies in that broader context.


Read more: http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/bruce/2008/08/extra_hearst_blacks_out_the_wo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, really?
Can we just describe "conservatives" as "assholes" and "dipshits" now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal1973 Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. I already do that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. How about Fascists and Nazis to descrive the conservatives?
I mean, if we want ot talk about "accuracy" and all that....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. How about 'Far fascist' or 'Ultra-Nazi'?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. in my humble opinion
fuck the Bay Guardian

until I see confirmation from a more reliable source, I'm not going to buy this

it may be true but the Bay Guardian isn't the most reliable and honest source

the paper has its own agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xfundy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hold on to yer hat, there
think maybe it was a "joke"? The SFBG has been known to do that from time to time.

Brugman, Dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's very true. It has a progressive agenda. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. it has a moonbat agenda
very far left

I'd be surprised to see if it endorses Pelosi over Cindy Sheehan for congress

and I'm sure it endorsed Chris Daly's takeover of the city Democratic Central Committee

wasn't one of his threats that the Bay Guardian won't endorse anyone that voted against Peskin for committee chair?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Maybe you should suggest to Rosie that he use moonbat
instead of progressive.

And if you think I'm going to bother to argue with you about my friend Chris Daly, you must be really bored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. you're known by the company you keep
and if you keep company with Chris Daly, that speaks volumes about you

Chris Daly is one of the reasons that San Francisco is in as poor shape as it is


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. LOL.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. And the Chronicle doesn't have an agenda?
The Bay Guardian is quite honest about theirs. But while you are making accusations about "reliable" and "honest", how about you provide actual evidence to the contrary.

By the way the Chronicle has already used the term "ultra-liberal"...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/15/BAFM12BBFN.DTL&hw=ultra+liberal&sn=002&sc=766
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. This is the same Chronicle that smeared Kevin Shelley,
tried to start up with Debra Bowen along the same lines, that continues to pretend Newsom's done squat about homelessness. When he wanted to foist the same failing voting machines that Chicago threw away, they went right along with him. The same Chronicle that hounds Chris for his wacky affordable housing projects and for trying to make it safe for sex workers to report assault and rape.

Yeah, that Chronicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. It is embarrassing that a city like this...
has a newspaper like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. uhuh, yeah 'far left' and 'ultra liberal' sound SO much less "politically loaded"
:crazy: They can quibble about the historical semantics of the terms, but the fact of the matter is there is a generally accepted understanding of "progressive" and it's a FUCK of a lot more "palatable" in MSM than "far left" and "ultra liberal". Progressive=Obama, even though he is actually moderate. Far/Ultra left: PETA and Noam Chomsky. That's how the media currently categorized things.

Are they gonna start calling conservatives, who are in actuality mostly neoconservatives, "far right" or "ultra right"? Where is the frenzied debate on that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. From the vantage point of the Bay Area "far left" and "ultra liberal"
are ALF and William Ayres, whereas PETA and Chomsky are practically mainstream thought. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Actually, there are three branches of the American right:
The Right, the Far Right, and the Shit-in-your-pants-and-go-to-heaven Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to stop using the word "newspaper", then.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Great. What will we call them? You're better at this than I am, but
I'll follow your lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. "Litter" is kind of generic. "Fishwrap" is my favorite but there's a case
for birdcage liner and puppy diapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. Barf-catcher.
That's what we used papers for in my house. My dog always gives us warning, so we kept the Oklahoman nearby. Anyone who's familiar knows it's an extremely conservative piece of crap. Finally cancelled it when I promised my husband the local paper had a good sports section and coupons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. That works! An all in one kit!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Ministry of Truth bulletin, propaganda rag, cage liner, fish wrap... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Journalistic integrity and profit be damned, we've got a political agenda." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. "...['Progressive'] doesn't describe where [some politicians] sit on the...political spectrum..."
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:10 AM by KrazyKat
What absolute rubbish! :grr:

And I suppose that the broad-based term "conservative" works just fine for your paper to describe every far-right wing weirdo and nutcase, from PNAC-signatory neocons to the rapture-ready crowd; from warmongers to atavistic racists; from the golf-playing billionaires to the "God is on our side" freaks who writhed and chanted on the hospital lawn during the Terry Schiavo ordeal.

Get real, Guardian, you fish-wrap piece of sh**. :nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. What you siad.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. The Chronicle is the offender. The Guardian is the alternative.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Newspeak.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 05:13 AM by baby_mouse
It's so blatant, but why is the Bay saying the chronicle's saying it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. The actual far left parties should sue them for libel.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 05:40 AM by billyoc
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can we call the San Francisco Bay Guardian "Pravda" now? It's a much shorter name, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. It's a shame such a fine city doesn't have a decent major newspaper
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal1973 Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. WTF? So they are gonna be like the AP
Look at their opinion. Preferred term? by whom? Faux news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. Uh, who decides?
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:37 PM by Xap
Who declares what is "far left" and what is "ultra liberal" from one day to the next and whose scale will they be using? One supplied by Fox Noise perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. "to describe the more liberal of San Francisco's political factions."
LOL!

Well, I guess it is San Franciscans describing their own.

But, still.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I don't know that it is us describing us.
I don't think Rosenthal is from here and the paper isn't locally owned.

The Chronicle has had a long feud with the actual liberals on the Board of Supervisors. This is just the last chapter of their juvenile cr@p.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Oh, then I take it all back! Bastards. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. It is funny in a way that here they have to come up with new terms
to describe "liberal", though, because "progressive" and "liberal" are too tame. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Which was my point.
But, I assumed the Chronicle was locally owned/operated, etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. The Bay Guardian is as close as we get.
They've done good things, too. When I was more active in homelessness advocacy, one of their reporters used to call me up and tip me that Newsom was doing another roust in the dead of night again.

I met Brugman once at a SPJ meeting where we gave a little presentation about a column we were doing in the local homeless paper. It was probably his idea to invite us. He's a good guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sooo, instead of "social conservative" (for example)...
...they will now use the terms "far right" and "reactionary" ... right? RIGHT???

Assholes.

Of course what they are really doing, is trying to smear those with liberal leanings. Using "far left" smacks of calling them commies, and "ultra liberal" of course just says they are extremist in their views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. ooh! Email that to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'll start referring to their product as "litter box liners" instead
More of that darn devil librul medya in action again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh for heaven's sakes.
More media framing. And the Chronicle at that. I'm appalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. To hell with the Chronicle. It's a rag. Read the Gate instead.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Wow-I didnt know Wyldwolf worked for the Chronicle.
I keed! I keed!

But seriously- I've watched the DLC types use this same approach for a couple of years now.

The problem is, once a left leaning moderate takes issue with a "liberal" who holds the microphone- he is brnaded "far left", etc.

I remember when DU's own DLC sympathisers accused me of being "far left" just for being opposed to the war, or for saying that DEMS should accuse Bush of lying. I can see something similar coming from the Chronicle...

These labels lose their meaning when they are merely used as a tool to separate conservative or right-to-moderate DEMS from anyone who disagrees with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. ROFL ROFL ROFL
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. It's crap. We know who is on our side and who shows up for wine tasting.
Chris Daly is much maligned here. This is my Chris Daly story, or one of them.

I managed to put together a fundrasier for the Homeless Coalition and got EVERYTHING donated. Talent -- comics, musicians, it was so beautiful. Restaurants donated food for the greenroom. Craig Newmark came and he HATES public speaking.

Daly's office told me he had to cancel because his wife was in labor. Okay.

So I'm sitting at the Great American Music Hall and Chris bounces into the place. He said she'd slowed down a little so he decided to come anyway. (He actually said she wasn't "progressing", lol.)

He didn't know me from Adam at the time but he came here as a community organizer and especially one that advocated for poor people.

So, if my choice is between language nazis at the Chronicle that are trying to slow down liberals in San Francisco or even between the real limo libs and Chris Daly, it's so much a no-brainer for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. You should tell Cant trust em that story.
A DUer and great pal who is a huge Daly backer.

He is in red states campaigning for Obama right now, so he may not be DUing at present...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I was wondering where CTE has been. That's great.
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 04:15 PM by sfexpat2000
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun 06th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC