|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
leftchick
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 01:56 PM Original message |
U.S. Navy's new ''big gun'' to replace conventional weaponry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. You never know when there might be a terrorist 230 miles away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. If only we had one on the USS Cole nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 02:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. Or in the Marine barracks in Beirut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think that pic is from Battlestar Galactica. Can't believe there's a guy firing his weapon at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. he mentions BG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Stargate Atlantis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
38. Umm, I'm thinking this is BS. At least the photo smells suspect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
66. That photo is from a science fiction show. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReformedChris
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. I have a sickening feeling our own citizens could one day stare down the barell of this weapon! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. What's with the purple light? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 07:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Plasma flash. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #32 |
49. I found it interesting that it requires something like 100000 Amps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd
![]() |
Wed Feb-06-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #49 |
69. That's good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
51. Special effects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. "... more effective than what anyone else can put on the battlefield." - Ain't we already there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nels25
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. From a strict defense stand point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The premise is we can hit a target at 230 miles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. No, very do-able. The projectile is fired upward at a 45 to 50 degree angle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Active electronics would be destroyed before it ever left the muzzle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You underestimate the ruggedness of solid state components. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 01:20 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. More than a few g's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 06:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. M982 Excalibur can be fired at full zone charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Point taken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #36 |
47. $240M for R&D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 08:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Mr. Tesha works on electronic equipment that *ROUTINELY* survives 60g for an hour or so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. But look at the ones ALREADY fired by HARP. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
58. Actually, it's fairly simple to construct an electronics package to withstand that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Oh really? It hasn't been done yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Run the numbers. You're looking at only 41,000 g's, less than HARP telemetry packages in *1965*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Wed Feb-06-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. The HARP project was a short-lived failure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Wed Feb-06-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Here's a paper on 60,000-g telemetry systems from 1966... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
41. Great point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. An additional facet to consider too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #16 |
50. And no unexploded ordinance to kill civilians ten years later n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
40. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nels25
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
54. That was one of my points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. I wonder if this is actually costing a lot of money.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. As long as they have some metallic content |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. You have the rail gun confused with a gauss gun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. So, will a EMP render this gun useless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
43. I'm guessing no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
59. No, the gun itself generates a hell of an EMP internally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renegade000
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. uh that's a screenshot of Stargate: Atlantis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. you are correct. someone's doling out some b.s. here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Hilarious! Good catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BreweryYardRat
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 03:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. Yup. Honestly, news guys, put a schematic or something up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
60. Here's a link to a Navy press release with more info, at least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
53. I fell for it until I examined the top of the photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. Ok as a sci fi writer this sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. What about the power supply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. 14,000,000 of these. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Easy, nuclear power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. The next generation of combat ships is slated to be electric drive, for redundancy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. if it can shoot a projectile 230 miles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
42. Can use the same Nuke Generators that power the ship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
52. Capacitors, most likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro
![]() |
Mon Feb-04-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
26. This weapon is an over the horizon ship killer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 06:57 AM Response to Original message |
31. As a career artilleryman, I can only applaud the Navy's efforts in building this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
39. If only DOD Funding transparent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. DoD funding is absolutely transparent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
63. I don't think that branch will ever say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawggie
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
44. I understand that the next step in personal armament for troops is the BFG9000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
45. Sounds like a nice weapon to have on our side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankmeCrankme
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. But it probably won't be just on our side. That's the nature of military technology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
55. Not practical for squirrel hunting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
56. looks like the Death Star's turbolasers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
57. We're catching up with the aliens n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
61. If I'm correct, the US Navy is now controlling/managing the HAARP system in Alaska |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-05-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. The system in the OP is a gun, not an antenna. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC