|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:27 PM Original message |
Judge grants Kucinich entry to Tuesday's debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kikosexy2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
88. Wonderful, yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. K & Fn R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Great news! K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Uh oh. He's the guy who wants the votes counted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good, Kucinich, like John Edwards should stay in the campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
48. It benefits Edwards, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
165. It is sort of a mixed bag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. SLAP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. THIS IS BIG!! Thank you, Dennis Kucinich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. A judge dictating to a news organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. A news organization that is trying to 'select' the next Pres. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
38. You're right. I though it stunk. I said so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #38 |
92. States have a say about what is on their airwaves, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #92 |
120. Nope. None at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftwing9 (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
171. These are not news organization decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Right decision maker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. no legal grounds that I can see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
109. Right decision maker to protect the public interest. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crud76 (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
166. "Media" Is The Plural Form Of "Medium" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Isn't it nice of corporations to share the airwaves with us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
58. WE OWN the airwaves... Not the M$M! They rent them from US!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. The courts have held that cable channels are not subject to the same public interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rjones2818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
76. Ummm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. ummm. the debate is on MSNBC, not NBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #78 |
163. Yeah, and they're both owned in whole or in part by GE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
82. the judge didn't just call up the network and tell them who to have on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #8 |
136. I would put "news organization" in quotation marks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
143. It's called a legal ruling in the context of a civil suit. So yeah, I'm okay with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yay! K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. WooHoo!! America gets to be heard!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. halle..fucking..lu.jah..this is great news..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wow!! I'm totally amazed!! Great News. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. A great day for democracy eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Fantastic n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
17. Great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. Thank goodness there are still a few *SANE* Judges out there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
19. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klukie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
21. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. Thank You JUDGE CHARLIE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
23. Thank you Judge Thompson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Fantastic...let him be heard...the voters deserve a real debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. I'm still confused why Kucinich backed Obama and not Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
54. Because Obama voted "NO" on the IWR and Edwards championed it and helped write it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #54 |
68. Championed and helped write it? Huh? he was a Freshamn Senator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. John Edwards CO-SPONSORED Lieberman's 2002 Iraq War Resolution! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rjones2818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. Ummm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
94. Read the speech Edwards gave on the Senate floor one week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. And I for one will NEVER forget that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. And we have to remember that this is one week after learning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. I respect your forgiving nature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. I agree with you! Probably could have worded it better or put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Thank you and sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. No problem :)) "While the masses play American Idol..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
75. Obama wasn't a US Senator yet -- he didn't vote for or against it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
79. HUH? Obama wasn't in the Senate yet when the IWR passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #79 |
99. No, no record there to be seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
84. lots of reasons probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southerncrone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
119. I received an email from DK he sent to his supporters explaining his decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:29 AM Response to Reply #26 |
125. Because he got really pissed off after hearing Edwards collude with Clinton -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
candymarl (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
27. All right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. Excellent! There's no reason he should have been excluded in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. WHOA-You Mean DK exists TOO?.....N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. This Edwards supporter says RIGHT fuckin' ON!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. ditto!. . It should help to keep the debate from veering off to the right..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. I'm curious what the legal basis for the Judge's ruling is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Talking about issues that affect all Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. You don't think more people will watch now that there has been controversy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:37 PM Original message |
Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickernation (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
161. no cable = no msnbc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. I would like to hear that also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. So, the judge should have a crystal ball to discern the outcome of all remaining primary elections, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. The question is what law gives the judge the right to decide what's "fair" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #59 |
96. A statute or "law" isn't required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #96 |
114. onenote....got a rebuttal??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #96 |
121. nice theory. but federal law and the first amendment trump any local court of equity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #121 |
178. Self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. DK got less than 3% of the vote last time he ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. He got 2% in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #67 |
116. hot damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
100. Two states don't win an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #100 |
140. no kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickernation (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
162. two percent doesn't win an election either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #162 |
169. Being actively ignored by the M$M doesn't help either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. It might you know have something to do with those pesky election laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. kinda doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
101. State Courts have broader subject matter jurisdiction ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #101 |
122. state courts can't hear what they don't have jurisdiction to hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #122 |
177. Self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
56. Aren't the debates part of the 'public service' contract they must uphold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Cable channels are not deemed to use the public airwaves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. Hmmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #61 |
142. That is a tortured argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
85. I would imagine that the legal basis has to do with making a contract with certain terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
117. almost every debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. The article does not state this but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. that would be the only thing I could think of and it seems like it would be quite a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
69. Apparently his complaint raised a contract claim, so that might be the basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #69 |
102. FCC is not a judicial body. It has no "jurisdiction." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
123. Having practiced before the FCC for 30 years, I wonder what I've been doing then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #123 |
179. My assumption was that he had to exhaust his ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #123 |
180. My apologies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. yeah, if DK doesn't like the question or the amount of airtime, he can go to court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Timmeh and Brian Williams |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. GO DK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. Da KOOCH is in the da house! Cue the Vonage theme! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
46. Shit! I will be watching now. Sorry to whomever you were I told I wouldn't. Heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
49. K & R. Wow -- that's a pleasant surprise. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
50. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
52. This is wonderful news. Fuck the media picking our candidates for us! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepCAblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
53. HUGE. Big SNAPS to that judge...and to Kucinich for his doggedness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
55. Great news, and a big F You to MSNBC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Great new slogan!! - "It's election, not selection." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
57. This is great news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
63. GREAT NEWS! A FAIR JUDGE...not a BUSH BOT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
65. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
66. Excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
70. DEMOCRACY LIVES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
73. Well hoooray!!! Democracy ain't completely dead after all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
80. More info on the judge's ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glimmer of Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
81. Wow. Good for Dennis. I hope he gets some decent airtime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
83. Just heard on KO's that NBC plans to appeal. They'll have to do it quick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #83 |
105. Thanks, ABC was quick to get the last suit dismissed. He really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
va4wilderness (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
86. Great! Gimme Some Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Right on, va4wilderness !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
87. Judge said he'd stop the debate if they don't let Kucinich in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
90. Kucinich has earned a seat at the debate table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Welcome to DU, grantcart..and thanks for being so inclusive, despite your position! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
93. 61 recommends but still many say they aren't on board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
95. K & R! Give 'em hell, Dennis! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bear425 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
98. Fantastic! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
103. Yay! And vote for him in Michigan to keep him in play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Better yet? It'll alert the progressives in America to wake up!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #106 |
118. Good idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
navarth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #103 |
149. that's exactly what I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
111. Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
112. UPDATE NBC IS APPEALING THE RULING per Keith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faux pas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
113. Sending Judge Charles Thompson a huge air kiss right on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
124. Kick and Recommend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
126. Now, if only they'd let Gravel, and we could have all our candidates up there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Agreed. In the protest letters I wrote to NBC, I included Senator Gravel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:02 AM Response to Reply #126 |
132. This is important, I'll admit to fighting harder for Kucinich than Gravel, but -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pooka Fey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
127. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Highway61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
128. Great news, except.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
129. Three Cheers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pjt7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #129 |
131. I hope he gets to debate, but it's more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
133. Justice speaks. Wonderful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
134. Nice to see the good guys win one for a change! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2beToby (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
135. I'm uneducated in the matter of jurisdiction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:05 AM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2beToby (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #137 |
155. Thanks =) and yeah Gravel and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #135 |
144. cable channels aren't subject to regulation for decency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2beToby (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #144 |
153. So does the FCC have any control over them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #153 |
157. the fcc has extremely limited regulatory authority with respect to cable networks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2beToby (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. Thanks for the info about the FCC and all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. false advertising laws, anti trust laws, libel, slander etc. all apply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AikidoSoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
138. Hooray for Dennis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaLittle Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
139. Looks To Me As Though Dennis Will NOt Be On Debate for "Leading" Candidates Tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
141. Here's hoping the Nevada Supreme Court takes a day off today nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
145. Wonderful news! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
146. Great News! Go Dennis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
147. Great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
148. GREAT! :o) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fjc (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
150. I beg to differ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roxy66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #150 |
159. I agree...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
151. I guess this means Tweety and crew need to appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
152. This is good news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
154. Pathetic that we have to get a court order for a legitimate candidate to be heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #154 |
170. god bless america. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #154 |
174. what is your definition of a legitimate candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
156. K&R - Now will they ask him anything or not??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
164. This may be your last chance Dennis. Make good use of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
167. Hip, hip....kr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
168. They should have never uninvited Kucinich. Really low-class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
172. Good for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #172 |
173. Here We Go Again With The UFO Cheap Shots . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #173 |
176. Actually, most of my views match Kucinich's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
175. BUT, Kucinich is starting to look like he just wants to STOP Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC