|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:06 AM Original message |
Poll question: Will you support the (D) nominee, IF ONLY for the judges and US Attorneys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. Its really quite simple for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. 99% In the affirmative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Obama isn't Irish -- good grief, at least know the candidates' names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Not our first choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It is a big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. you are such a good proofreader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Actually the correct usage is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
98. weak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
48. Actually, Obama mother is of Irish decent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #48 |
103. thanks . thought no big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fuzzy otter pop (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. i will always support the lesser of two evils, no matter what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. Come on now people voting "No." Please explain, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It slays me -- if they mean it, they need to leave DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I think most will hide behind the anonymity of the poll, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
112. how many times do posters have to tell you NO before you get the message? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
139. Then it can be a nice little Hilary Echo Chamber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It's funny - if worse comes to worse the courts will be yet that much MORE important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
53. Let's hope it is just the troll factor and not real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RuleOfNah (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. Which (D) voted for Bush judges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
11. Whenever I waver, I think about the courts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. Yes. The next President may get to fill a few vacancies on the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
14. If you can convince me the Dem nominee will do any better, then yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. You don't think any of the Democrats would be better than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. you are not an idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Do you seriously think any Hillary or Obama nominee wouldn't be significantly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Do you find Scalia and Ginsburg to be no different in any substantive way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #28 |
37. what makes you think Hillary would pick a Ginsburg? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Look at her legislative record and score on chice. You're opposed to her on faith - bad faith. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
59. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:48 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Really? What's her record on reproductive choice? On Habeas Corpus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #61 |
106. that will all mean NOTHING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #106 |
108. So you're operating on faith-based reasoning. Bad faith, but still faith. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. But you ignore the reality of Clinton's legislative record for some imagined future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. someone is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. Bullshit. Ignoring actual legislative record in favor of unevidenced fears is fucking idiotic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #120 |
123. You want us to vote your fears instead of our hopes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. You're wrong on several counts. Here they are: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. Well, I certainly wish you luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Post #27, earlier in this subthread. That's what I was asking about - to the person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. Well, again good luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Sorry but I need to clarify: I didn't ask to prove what's going to happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. But that seems rather unlikely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. We agree more or less on the first point. Your second question is separate, and not what I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #123 |
128. I don't know who the (D) nominee is going to be, but I will say if you don't vote for HIM or HER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. Tsk, you won't win any new friends that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-13-08 05:52 AM Response to Reply #132 |
144. Eh, you're probably right about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #23 |
45. When you carefully pick issues, anyone will be better than anyone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Your point is correct. But I think prioritization is a part of virtually all decision making. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. I agree about prioritization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Of course not - and I apologize for any implication that you should substitute my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:57 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. You mean I am an idiot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
43. I think individual Democrats will do better, most certainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
113. no, they are just as corporatist as the republicans are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. So then you'll enable Republicans into the White House because???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
42. Why should I enable Republicans who call themselves Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Hmmm. A sincere answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #44 |
49. And my sincere answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I think your question is good and fair - and I agree with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. And therein lies my extreme frustration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Yeah, but if you look WAY back, even past 25 years ago, you'd see a very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. I am not saying goodbye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #42 |
57. Well I'm not aware of any republican calling themselves democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #57 |
68. So writing "corn" on a can of peas makes it a can of corn? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Well the problem is you're going around writing corn on those can of peas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #73 |
96. The problem is that I buy "Democrat" and get a can of "Republican" as often as not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
140. Joe Lieberman is a Republican that calls himself a democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
16. even if only for that one reason, but I'm sure there are others too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
20. A democrat on his/her absolutely WORST DAY EVERY is still better.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Anyone dumb enough to see no difference between Scalia and Ginsburg is a hopeless case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. Ugh - I just choked a bit on my hot tea reading that comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
22. Other: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. ditto! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. So you'd be willing to take another Scalia rather than vote for someone that would give you another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Okay....but can you explain why you think one or some of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
26. I am supporting the DEM nominee (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
31. Beware....reference this quote from Barack Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Yeah yeah. But a moderate like Ginsburg is 1000% preferable to an Alito. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Ughh. Thanks for trying to shoot down my argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I agree. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
34. There are other reasons in which to support the Dem nominee than just that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
41. At least.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
141. Not voting is not supporting repugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
47. No. Appointment of judges is one of many criteriia determinging my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
54. Not just yes, but f*ckty f*ck yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
56. Other: I am way past accepting fear or pie-in-the-sky as a reason to vote for anyone. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:53 AM Original message |
All I can say to that is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
63. Wow... another loyalty oath poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Don't call it a loyalty oath poll. Did you read the part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #66 |
70. I'd rather have 8 more years of Republican rule than another DINO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Yea, well civil liberties may not matter much to you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. What civil liberties? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. You are so confused. First of all, I asked: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. I said nothing about Edwards, you brought him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Speaking of which, this little tidbit oughta interest you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Now that is awesome. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #76 |
143. Edwards and Kucinich are the only non-DINOS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #74 |
86. What civil liberties? Hm. The right to be charged and have a jury trial and defend oneself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Have you heard of Guantanamo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I have. Do you think Republican appointed justices are going to be on the right side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. The Dem candidates have appointed federal judges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. No, but they have legislative records. So on matters of civil liberties and the court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Probably A 'D'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. We may simply need to disagree, but I maintain that ANY 'D' will nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. That is probably true, although it's not a slam dunk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #71 |
142. The democrats had eight years to fight the rethugs on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #66 |
77. There's nothing "petty" or personal about my response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #63 |
81. It's just, you know, our legal rights and such. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #63 |
85. Oh, nice melodramatic response to a reasonable question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
65. This is my primary concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
69. 14 people have said this doesn't matter to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. I know. And I find post #70 particulary disturbing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
87. They are people who don't give a shit about civil rights, IMO, and put their pride |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
75. Well, here's the choice then . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
82. Why I voted no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Okay, that's a fair answer. You don't trust that these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. Remember Souter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. I understand your rationale and your point about how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. I guess you have more faith in Edwards and Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. Let's put it this way....I have the most faith in Edwards. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
83. I've gotta ask... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #83 |
121. If you take any stock in polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #121 |
138. That's not what I was asking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
97. Gee, another day, another loyalty oath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. Sigh. Here's what I wrote upthread to the person who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
100. This Was the Argument I Used on Family in 2000 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
102. There is only ONE goal...No REPUGS in November - PERIOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
107. ****Anybody else wanna vote?**** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
111. NO, i will take no pledges of support no matter what. my vote cannot be bought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
116. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
117. Of course, I'm not naive enough to believe that we don't have anything left to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawaii Hiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
118. Ab-so-fucking-lootely, I will vote for whomever the Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
119. To the 33% of you who didn't choose Option #1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
122. I think I will support the (D), but. it's still a gamble that they won't appoint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
125. Hell YES I'll vote for the Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
126. Who is this rich guy? And will he affect Hillary like he did Blair? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
127. I'll support the D Nominee, period. Beyond that, I'll do it enthusiastically. Any of the top 3 would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
129. I will support the Democratic nominee no matter what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-12-08 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
136. I will support the democratic nominee because: I am a yellow dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 31st 2024, 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC