|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:36 PM Original message |
OK, NOW---The explanation behind the polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Again, kicking for exposure...appreciating any recs. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. According to political compass John Edwards appears the least conservative of the group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
61. The hard left Edwards took will not help him in the general election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Edwards is the only candidate who has the courage and resolve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. They did a good job cleaning up after Bush Sr.. The cabinet was solid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #67 |
98. Doing things differently is NOT cleaning up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dickbearton (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #98 |
137. NCevilDUer, I agree with you; but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
134. How I would like to think that HC would bring things back to normal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #65 |
93. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #61 |
101. You Live In The South So You MUST Have Some Idea About HOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #101 |
114. I have to jump in. I do not have one single friend who is a democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #114 |
122. Hey, I've Run Into Those Who Are VERY Soft For Hillary... But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dickbearton (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #114 |
138. That says more about your friends then HC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #101 |
142. Elizabeth Edwards pointed out (while in Iowa) recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. I missed most of your polls earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm pretty much with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think #1 will pretty much happen on it's own... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. I think you have a pretty good read on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. Anybody willing to give one more rec? After that, I don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I've already rec'd it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. I was going to come back and kick for a 5th, but you're up to 20 already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
44. I hope we can get this discussion going all over the country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Shamelessly kicking to see if I can get one more R? Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. You trigger some thoughts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It will have to be a concious decision of the people. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
143. Why behind Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. tough question to ponder.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. This is so...interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. #5..k&R...GOOD IDEAS!! Edwards is my guy unless Gore gets in!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. About Gore... me, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I support John even if Gore jumps in. But I would welcome Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
62. fly speaks for me n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
17. Does anyone know how to rename the links above... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. yeah use the HTML lookup table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. here it is for the first poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:03 PM Original message |
Thanks. I won't do that now, but will remember it for the future... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. Rest assured, she is not going to make it...Edwards wins IA by 2%, Obama wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Can you tell me the TX lottery numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
20. Rattie, I have to absorb all of that. This calls for coffee! but k&r for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. Dennis Kucinich is the ONLY candidate that matches my views on most issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Dennis Rocks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I agree with you 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Betrayal is a harsh word... probably too harsh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Well thanks for bursting my bubble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #46 |
64. Yes, i would add to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. If Al Gore enters, the whole equation changes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
43. I hope you're right about that, Steve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #24 |
87. Yes Kucinich matches my views the best, but Edwards is 2nd and can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #87 |
126. Great minds think alike ! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
25. Kicked and HIGHLY recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
45. I appreciate that response.... In my opinion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. I like the strategic approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. You cite small-response DU polls as being representative of the general public? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. But if all those that did participate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. It's not representative of the General Public but it is or should be indicative of the possible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. That's what I was aiming at. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
48. No, I don't do that. I started pretty well knowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #48 |
108. i have been saying that since 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
83. Small sample = larger margin of error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. I agree but you have to take into account the compacted primary season this cycle.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hatchling (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
35. Food for thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
55. That is how I feel as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. So now we believe "polls" -- and MSM . . . ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
40. Oh my God, that was well said, you'll scare people by making so much sense!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. You're thinking what I'm thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. Well I will do what I can to get the idea going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. Grassroots, you've planted the seed here. You'll need to find someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
41. oh yeah, gladly recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlowDownFast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
47. No flames here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
51. Nice analysis, I appreciate it. I have always felt that Edwards was the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
52. This is a very good idea except... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. In that scenario, I'm for Edwards and Obama working out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:15 AM Response to Reply #52 |
69. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mister Ed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
56. Of all three options, I also like #3 the best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
59. I like your Option #3 as well. If they all can't stay in maybe the top five? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynthia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
60. I'm for option #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
66. First - 1/2 of 3% of the eligible voters in Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:38 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. And, that's what I'm trying to avoid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tafiti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
68. I have no greater hope than Clinton NOT getting the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iaviate1 (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:58 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Somehow everybody was pulled together for Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iaviate1 (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
70. I supported the lesser evil last time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tafiti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #70 |
109. I don't think that's what he's saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlingBlade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
72. The Re-Pugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dragonlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #72 |
133. They know they'd like to run against her n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
74. We are totally on the same page RE ! Excellent analysis. I wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
75. Here is my thinking this Wednesday morning. I have hope. That finally. The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
76. Damn, rateyes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
77. Yes, but if you put up a NYC lawyer (Ghoul) vs. a Southern Lawyer my guess is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:34 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Oh really?? If Edwards is the "Southern Lawyer" his win/loss record fighting for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:54 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Polls don't show that he's doing that impressively vs. Ghoul. Don't Get me Wrong: I like Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. I know. My thought is that Edwards vs. Ghoul in Miss, LA, Tenn, SD, ND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:21 AM Response to Reply #84 |
146. I figure Florida lg num electoral votes for Biden. NYC Metro retirees are not warm and fuzzy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
78. Don't forget superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
81. Your results were so bizarre I don't think they explain anything at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #81 |
86. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Semper_FiFi (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #81 |
120. Sorry but you make way too much sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
82. According to a guest on NPR, the repubs want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #82 |
94. I Can Certainly See Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
85. There's a fundamental flaw in your underlying assertions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #85 |
89. The othe rmajor flaw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #89 |
97. To be honest, these polls may not even represent the avg DUer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Good point. The time frame is also an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #85 |
105. The national polls are irrelevant. What is important is the first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. They're certainly more relevant than 100 people voting in a DU poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #107 |
115. Not to the point being made by the OP they are not and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #115 |
121. The point being made by the OP is apparently that a few DU polls represent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #85 |
106. Useless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoFederales (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
88. Good plan; I will not support HRC under any circumstance. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toadzilla (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
91. this is exactly why we need instant run off voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Martin Eden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #91 |
124. I've been sounding the IRV trumpet for years ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
92. Wall street & the corporate media cabal (cmc) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsMagnificent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
95. The simple answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #95 |
104. Ed Schultz did a straw poll on Friday asking who people would vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #95 |
131. I Agree With All You Have Said & I Too As Woman Just Find Her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
96. This thread is proof that lots of people on DU have never taken Statistics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #96 |
103. Wishful thinking trumps logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #103 |
117. And Desperation Trumps Almost Everything Else!! If I Can Help Stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #96 |
113. Every Idea Starts Really Small... Ideas CAN Grow!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
99. What A Phenomenal Suggestion And/Or Idea!! I KNOW I've Run Into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
102. K & R Like A Sonofabitch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duncan (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
110. I'm with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meowomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
111. Al Gore! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #111 |
119. Ga-Ga Gore!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
112. But if we had Rethugs posing as Dems on this anonymous chat board they could skew the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. I Think We Already Have Them OR At The Very Least PAID Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #112 |
118. The polls were simply an experiment to judge if I was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #118 |
125. "the majority of Democrats find the most objectionable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #118 |
141. Stop Making Things Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mastrmassr (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
123. DENNIS IS THE ONE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
127. I would support Edwards should he not get the Dem nomination and runs as an Indy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
128. Her base is larger than 33%. Try 50% nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. I don't think so. 'An inch deep and a mile wide' commitments off the cuff nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Closer to 50% than 33%. 47% at the moment, on average. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
130. Hillary has what W. had in 2000--name recognition. Clinton/Bush--former president's names help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
135. She will win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
136. That's interesting because I live in the South and I and many of my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
139. NO. I'm just as opposed to the #2 as Clinton. Only Kucinich or Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
140. Another rec from me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
144. Sensational, thoughtful analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
145. Pulling together all the opposition to Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
147. Kick because Thom Hartman is talking about this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 10th 2024, 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC