|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:03 PM Original message |
I think many here owe jason leopold an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Color me curious: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Explain please. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I may be fuzzy on the details, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Oh I remember how Leopold was treated here by some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. er...I wasn't changing MY views. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:24 PM Original message |
I'm sorry. I misread your OP the first time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
70. no problemo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. So do I..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. That's not at all what happened. He did not say that Rove's name was on the indictment docs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
74. It could have very well happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
91. The evidence appears to indicate Leopold was correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. No, Leopold said that Rove WAS indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #95 |
108. And that may also be correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #108 |
123. So, show me where the proof is that Rove was indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
54. Actually, the reason he fell so hard is that he kept on lying and lying and lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
55. Delete, dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. So far so good. And folks who were skeptical were called fuckwits, cretins and shitdogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Too bad DU can be so indirect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:22 PM Original message |
This is just what we need, to bring up this shit again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Yes, you are fuzzy on the details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. Really? You think so? Here's the orig. article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euphen (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. That is not the article. This is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Well, mine was the original article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
164. Not redacted memo. 2005 appeals court decision re: Miller & Cooper which had nothing to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. Iirc, he said that the indictment for Rove had been issued, under seal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
60. You're skipping an important point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
73. thanks, well, like I said, I was hoping others would fill in the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fading Captain (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
104. Sorry, but if you expect people to apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #104 |
121. yes to both, his only mistake was trying to help to keep us all informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #104 |
130. I think I want people to apologize for HOW they treated him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
149. Why do you want to bring this up now....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. I always believed Jason's story. KKKRove cut a last minute deal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. That's been proven not the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
76. Linky? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #76 |
157. Enclosed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #157 |
158. hum, that link's not working for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. kicking my own thread wait, what's that i hear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. When I read Jeralyn's thread (see op) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Sorry him and TO are only Drudge sites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. DRUDGE sites?? Tell that to Will Pitt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Actually it was Trolls sent by Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
92. blogosphere, maybe, but not for chatboards. they killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
112. Some of them ended up here, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
96. Truthout is a Drudge site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. jason leopold is a lying coke head and they would not admit he made thngs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #97 |
107. That dog won't hunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. Wilson does not know him, he is just a blogger to Wilson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes thank you for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
12. Agree but have to say I am expecting to hear...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. But spaz, it may have been right "in substance" but it was not right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. The substance of his report was not the "3 business days" part, imo, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
43. "More right than wrong" doesn't cut it if you call yourself a journalist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. LOL, you know as well as I, journalists may mess up in small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. Excuse me, but... why? Rove's name is in legal arguments as a suspect. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. No proof at all. He claimed as a fact there was an indictment. There was not, so he was either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
53. Karl, right after TO broke the story, David Shuster (who reported the exact same thing as JL)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
78. You make some interesting points...but, a couple things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
109. If you all accepted information as bon fide, with the obvious possibility that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. I always believed him, because I believed Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Oh I guess I'd better pick up his slack then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. I believed Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I have immense respect for Will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Ahhhh yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. No freaking kidding. The stench is finally gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. I have had many a creepy, disgusting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
100. OLL was probably in actuallity a young Regent University trained lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #100 |
114. I grew to know OLL pretty well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #114 |
120. Thanks for that. I thought OLL was ok from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #120 |
129. Likewise, tho I can understand why those who experienced her ire may feel differently.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #114 |
124. I also liked her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. OLL could rub people the wrong way, no doubt, but her experience was unique... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Oh I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. It rubbed people the wrong way so bad that it got booted off DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #141 |
146. She came close to leaving a bunch of times on her own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #124 |
159. She also wasn't shy about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. Actually, Jason reported that Rove "was" indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. fair enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. Bullshit. The claim was that Rove HAD BEEN indicted.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. "Dewey beats Truman" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Or, was it "will be indicted"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Exactly. And when the indictment failed to materialize, dozens of DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. Yeah that 24 business hours was the kicker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
32. Bull. He said flat out there had been an indictment drawn up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I thought his assertion was that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. The target letter was public knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #42 |
64. Wrong article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. bad link.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
58. I guess I could be wrong H20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
79. As I recall... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. Those letters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. That's interesting. If they were never public, how did Leopold know about THOSE too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. No. He said an indictment had been issued. Said it flat out and plainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
62. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
68. Here's the original article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
81. Yes, that was the first reporting. The next day this one came out: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. He should have stuck with the first one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #83 |
90. I think he just got so caught up in scoop-citement and a strong hope/belief that he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
35. Impeach Dick Cheney... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
117. Seconded. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
36. So, Rove actually *was* indicted, as Leopold reported in May 2006? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
65. In 24 business hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #65 |
133. How many years in 24 business hours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
39. He LIED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
75. He didn't make so much up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
111. Silence came the stern reply.... mustn't complicate things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
47. 1 of 5 things happened. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. That's what I was just thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #57 |
66. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #57 |
151. agree....that was a hard time....here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. thanks darlin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
80. I agree completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Sometimes it's all in the delivery. . .:) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
67. And it happened within 24 business months! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Oh, that's so funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #67 |
84. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
77. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
82. I Never Doubted Jason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. The reasons he wasn't have nothing to do with the subject of this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. I Think Jason Had It Right And Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. Nope. If indictments existed, all the grand jury members would know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #101 |
122. Here is some interesting info re indictments.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. But, Leopold said Fitzgerald served Rove's attorneys with the papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. No, not according to the material I posted the link.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:20 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Not according to the following... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. Here's a better article that I think will explain things better to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. Actually, in legal terms, it is not an indictment the Jury returns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
87. It appears you back up Leopolds detractors by showing how he jumped the gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Yes, yes they are two different things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:22 PM Response to Reply #87 |
132. Actually, I said some people owed him an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
99. Impeach the Vice Pirate n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
102. The whole episode was a disgrace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #102 |
113. And it may be a freeper sight for some... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #102 |
165. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
103. I think the fact that Ambassador Wilson sat down recently for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. If Joe Wilson trusts him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
105. Thanks for posting, Leopold was telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laylah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
110. I apologized from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
118. I remember this well and I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
119. No. Leopold claimed Rove was actually indicted and had to get the weekend to get his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
135. Hmmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
136. Jason Leopold kneepad brigade checking in! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
137. I'll apologize to him in "FIVE BUSINESS DAYS" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
139. Not me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
142. Please, buy my bridge! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. I don't respond well to personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #144 |
147. No one is attacking you personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #147 |
154. no problemo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:27 PM Response to Reply #144 |
152. Don't think.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
143. I don't see anything about Rove being indicted last year or any other time on that thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #143 |
148. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
145. I should point out that asking people to apologize for how he was treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #145 |
150. Two problems with that thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #145 |
153. Unsubstantiated might-have-beens are grounds for an owed apology? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
155. i don't think anyone here owes jason leopold an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
156. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magrittes Pipe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
160. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
161. An Apology ??? - From The Leopold Lynchmob ??? - Good Luck With That !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
162. I don't think so.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
163. The facts aren't all in, but I suspect you're right. Sorry, Jason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
166. I'll start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
167. You're not another one of Leopold's sock puppets, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 31st 2024, 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC