|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Halliburton
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:12 PM Original message |
Jonathan Turley: Fitz gave Rove assistance in clearing up misstatements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. Assistance by the prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. I just read that statement by Turley on the Washington Post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Turley is a scholar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 12:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
50. he`s saying nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Fitzgerald may have gave Rove A Proffer & Subsequently Immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. I tend to agree with what Turley said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluefish
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. deference and assistance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. so the Fitzgerald halo appears to be dimming... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Only if you don't understand what probably happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Nope, not in my book of halos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm of the mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. I think the salient point in this, like all other issues these days, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Bingo..well said. !.Time for people to wake up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. The Dems already are irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. The only options I really believe in are the people fighting election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. But if the media just ignores them, there is no issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
51. you're right, but we're still fighting.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh My Oh My.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastic cat
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. And the Sliming of Fitzgerald Version 2: Operation Sucker Dems begins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Here we go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. I've always been a big fan of Turley's, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Turley is a worthless piece of shit, and I'm not surprised at you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. uh oh, you're goanna get put in Ignoreland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. You say that like it's a BAD thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. heh, true dat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. J Edgar Hoover redux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 11:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Agreed, Tom but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 07:24 AM Response to Reply #35 |
44. Karl has the best spy ring in the world to use to look at Fitz's past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. I trust Turley's opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
22. Amen! Let's not forget that Fitz is a Repub. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. That must have been cold comfort to all the Illinois GOP members he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. He just wrecked the Republican machine of an entire state government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. No, he is not a republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 12:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
37. "I'm not partisan; I'm not registered as part of a party..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 05:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
42. Fitzgerald is careful to be apolitical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuthbert J Twillie
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 07:00 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. The WAPO article is playing games with Fitz's IL voter registration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. only in the primary do we register party affiliation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 08:17 AM Response to Reply #22 |
45. Oh good gravy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #22 |
48. tell that to the republicans in illinois |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otokogi
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. 5x to testify is HIGHLY unusual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 01:38 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Yup, that's the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. I listen to Turley, but with all antenna up. He was disgusting in the 90's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie
![]() |
Tue Jun-13-06 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
33. Talk Left posted this today - not exactly the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
36. The only thing for sure is, this story ain't over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
38. INteresting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
39. Looks like all we got for Fitzmas was a beat-up scooter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
41. Rove not off the hook, and Cheney may be the target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
46. Would I rather see rove indicted and pardoned, or rove forced to testify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jun-14-06 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
47. what the fuck is this guy talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 06:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC