Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New evidence for a preferred direction in spacetime challenges the cosmological principle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Bosonic Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:16 AM
Original message
New evidence for a preferred direction in spacetime challenges the cosmological principle
(PhysOrg.com) -- According to the cosmological principle, there is no special place or direction in the universe when viewed on the cosmic scale. The assumption enabled Copernicus to propose that Earth was not the center of the universe and modern scientists to assume that the laws of physics are the same everywhere. Due to the cosmological principle, scientists also assume that the universe is “homogeneous” - having a uniform structure throughout - and “isotropic” - having uniform properties throughout.

But a few recent studies have found the possible existence of cosmological anisotropy: specifically, that the universe’s expansion is accelerating at a faster rate in one direction than another. In the most recent study, scientists have analyzed data from 557 Type 1a supernovae and found, in agreement with some previous studies, that the universe’s expansion seems to be accelerating faster in the direction of a small part of the northern galactic hemisphere.

The researchers, Rong-Gen Cai and Zhong-Liang Tuo from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, have posted their study at arXiv.org.

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-evidence-spacetime-cosmological-principle.html
Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's the Borg.
I knew it.

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans are Borg...individuals are irrelevant....



Thanks for the science post!! :) Cool stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. that "principle" is really a background assumption rather than something actually scientific
in the sense of being scientifically observed or experimentally tested
also, Copernicus cited Hermes Trismegistus to underpin his theory: someone should PM Dover...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Imagine an explosion
I picture the universe as an explosion. Like any explosion we've all seen photos or movies of. They are not smooth and uniform like soap bubbles. They accompanied by cauliflower like growths of smoke and hot gasses. Not smooth at all. In fact if we are located on one of these kind of protuberances we might not be even able to "see" around our localized distortion of explosive space time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DetlefK Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are talking about CMB-anomalies
An explosion is not isotropic because of tiny local stochastic differences that build up und form intersecting shockwaves.
Even if you take an explosion that's much bigger than the detonator, e.g. an atomic mushroom clud, you can see those fluctuations.

Similar fluctuations (although in the per-mille range) have been found in the cosmic microwave background. They are explained by gravitational disturbances, because matter weren't distributed homogenous from early on in the universe. (The inhomogenity could be explained by some sort of plasma oscillations.)



Maybe it's a Linde bubble: Our universe breeding a baby universe. And once our event horizons no longer touch (due to spatial expansion), the baby universe is considered born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cool!
Thanks for that explanation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 26th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC