INDEPENDENT mathematicians,statisticians et al: Critique the probabilities

[TruthIsAll]

To believe that Bush won the election, you must also believe...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x22581

18 Battleground State Exit Polls:
The Probability that Kerry would get over 50% was 99.998%.
He got 48.87% of the votes.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x29275

REVERSE THE MEDIIA SPIN:
Kerry's 2-Party% vs.Bush- Exit Polls vs. Actuals
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x31588


Exit Polls vs. Actuals:
Who do you believe-CNN or your lying eyes?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x26387


PROBABILITY KERRY WOULD LOSE BOTH OHIO AND FLORIDA:
(BASED ON THE EXIT POLLS): 1 OUT OF 667 (.15%)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x27862


MASSIVE FRAUD!
ANALYSIS VINDICATED BY A FORMER MIT MATH PROFESSOR
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x32899

187 MILLION TO ONE:
The odds that 7 out of 18 Battleground states would deviate from Exit Polls beyond the Margin of Error - all in favor of Bush.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x38892


250 MILLION TO ONE:
PROFESSOR FREEMAN AT THE UNIV. OF PENN. CALCULATED THE ODDS THAT ACTUAL VOTE DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXIT POLLS ARE NOT DUE TO CHANCE.
http://www.dakotatechnics.com/downloads/Steve_Freeman.z...
DU thread to the above link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Scoop: 47 State Exit Poll Analysis Confirms Swing Anomaly
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x38567

Statistical proof the election was rigged. IMPORTANT! Please read!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2682466

[Robert Oak]

1. w/ a caveat

You must watch out for biased "academic" reports from right wing think tanks.

We need independent statisticians and computer experts...

but bear in mind "free trade" and outsourcing have been proselytized
by these think tanks when their conclusions were written before
they started the study.

Many economists have countered these papers as being faulty, incorrect,
but amazingly enough those opinions somehow get buried while
multinational corporations turn to the research papers they themselves
bought and paid for to "prove" what they wanted to hear.

So, look at the background of any think tank or Academic first...

and we also need the raw exit polls. I find it very interesting
how silent they are and also how they refuse to give that information
over to analysts.

[rockedthevoteinMA]

2. why don't you try emailing

Paul Krugman with it? he seems like one who might get involved (far stretch I know) @NYT

[shelley806]

3. TruthisAll, I'll tell you what I want to see: All of those states,

counties, and precincts that did NOT use Diebold, ES and S, Sequoia, and the other Diebolical cheating machines, and compare these across the board to those that did...then look at the differences in exit poll data, and statistics on registered republicans and registered Democrats in those with diabolical vs those without... Has this been done? I'd do it if I knew how and where to access the information.

[TruthIsAll]

4. I have a breadown by state, but not by precinct.

I hope someone else will do it, cause I won't.

[TruthIsAll]

5. This is a fix to the 250 MILLION to ONE link.

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/Unexplained_exit_poll_discrep_v00l.pdf