Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Is there anything which would improve Blair & Bush's ratings?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 02:37 AM
Original message
Question: Is there anything which would improve Blair & Bush's ratings?
Answer: http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1841140,00.html

I'm not saying it's a conspiracy. I'm just pointing out how it's come at EXACTLY the right time ...

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just as well Tony flew out before this
or he'd be seriously inconvenienced too. They have said that he did know about the operation in the last few days.

Do you think this would improve Blair's ratings? I don't - people will grumble. What it might do is give him ammunition for yet more laws and restrictions. If Parliament does get recalled becuase of Lebanon, it wouldn't surpirse me if he didn't have a debate on security too, with lots of "I told you so - we need 90 day detention" and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe in the case of Blair, Mu, I should have said "credibility" ...
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 03:49 AM by non sociopath skin
... rather than "ratings" although I do think that he and the Abominable Doctor Reid will gain political kudos in the eyes of the Ovine Classes.And yes, expect the Thought Police to get a pay rise ...

As for the US of A, our American comrades have pointed out that the Rovites are already playing the "Dump Leiberman, Get Osama" card for all it's worth. Bush must be jumping with joy.

Me, I'm just waiting for more details. I loathe terrorism and accept that you can't play footsie with sociopaths but my crap detector has been ringing all morning. Already, I'm hearing "well, maybes .."

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are way off the mark Skin
If for example, the cabinet were split over Middle Eastern policy and one member of the government had just resigned in protest I could see that they might put this up as a smokescreen.















Oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Shit! They're ahead of me ...
:argh:

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Nothing like a good Labour party revolt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Am I the only person
to look at John Reid's "We're doomed! We're doomed! Don't panic - surrender your freedoms!" speech yesterday and at today's headline making activities and ask myself if this can just be a coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, you aren't. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thank goodness
I was getting worried. The BBC are totally onboard with this "crisis".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. So....
Whilst Blair is on holiday we've got and running the country?

May as well replace John Reid with a .wav file
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBBulldog Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. New MI5 Terror threat level indicator...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Brilliant! Did you make that, or did you find it seomwhere? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBBulldog Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. sadly not my work, nicked it from...
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 07:09 AM by FBBulldog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Here in the US,
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 08:53 AM by Karenca
we're thinking "terra, terra"
'cause bush's boy Lieberman lost the primary.

We had the same "we're doomed speech"
yesterday from the White House Press Secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. I missed that one...
Got a link? I'd like to see it.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Have no fear - John Prescott's in charge
I'm sure he's squeezing himself into his sheriff's uniform as I type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh God, Mu, I'm going to have to live with that mental image all day ...
Sigh!!

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBBulldog Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh Sweet Jesus! We really are doomed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. As long as it's just a six shooter in his pocket....
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. If I hated Western civilisation I'd want to keep Bush and Blair in power.
What better way to ensure the fall of the Great Satan than to keep Chimpy and his Poodle in place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. It's less about ratings
and more about control and fearmongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. War and Piece
Britain arrests 18 overnight in operation to avert terrorist plot to blow up planes between the UK and US. "It is believed that the plan was to cause near simultaneous explosions on around three planes from the UK travelling to the US using explosives smuggled onboard inside hand luggage," the Guardian reports. "Police have arrested around 18 people in the London and Thames Valley areas. They are described as 'British-born' and were held as part of an operation which has been ongoing for several months." Blair, in the Carribean, briefed Bush during the night. No handluggage allowed for planes out of the UK, including no cell phones, laptops, or notably, liquids. Sky reports those arrested are 20 mostly young, British-born Asian men. Arrests come after speech by British home secretary John Reid Wednesday to think tank criticizing civil liberties groups. "They just don't get it," he said.

http://www.warandpiece.com/

Anti-terror critics just don't get it, says Reid
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1841132,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. Or, It could be true
From Billmon...

In it, Dr. Bernard Haykel, distinguished professor of Middle Eastern studies at NYU, warns that Hizbullah's star turn in the spotlight profoundly threatens Al Qaeda both ideologically and commercially, increasing the risk the group might go on another killing spree in order to protect the diminishing value of its name brand:


Al Qaeda, after all, is unlikely to take a loss of status lying down. Indeed, the rise of Hezbollah makes it all the more likely that Al Qaeda will soon seek to reassert itself through increased attacks on Shiites in Iraq and on Westerners all over the world -- whatever it needs to do in order to regain the title of true defender of Islam.

Just remember: You didn't read it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. All I can say is that I'm glad I don't work on air freight.
Mind you, after seeing some of the comments on DU I have to say that there are quite a lot of people on here whom I'm glad don't work on air freight! :rofl:

As to the terror alert, well all I can say that suspects have been arrested and I hope for the sake of the old bill that they actually get convictions. It really does not benefit anyone to have any more of the sort of pallaver we have had over Forest Gate arrests and the Stockwell shooting.

Until then I'll steer well clear of the tin-foil hat brigade who seem convinced that everything that goes against their agenda is a massive global conspiracy on the part of Karl Rove/Tony Blair/Joe Lieberman/Bilderberg/Freemasons/Opus Dei/Iluminati etc, and I hope that things get back to normal ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. I wondered if any of you could have a look at this
It's about the ricin plot prior to the Iraqi invasion. Is this information correct? It is a very credible source, but I'd like it confirmed. Do you have information that correlates?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1874132&mesg_id=1876355
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evermind Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Sort of. Check this Register story for more info and links
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/27/guardian_pulls_ricin_piece/

Guardian pulls ricin terror debunk from website

Story about imaginary terror now itself imaginary
By John Lettice
Published Wednesday 27th April 2005 14:31 GMT

A Guardian story on "The ricin ring that never was" has been pulled from the newspaper's website, for what are said to be 'legal reasons'. The story, by Duncan Campbell (the investigative writer, not the Guardian journalist of the same name), analysed the collapse of the UK's 'ricin conspiracy' trial, and reported Porton Down evidence that had made it clear that claims of mass poisoning attacks had no basis.

Campbell's story, which is still widely available on the web (including here), covered similar territory to George Smith's pieces at GlobalSecurity.org (here and here). Campbell and Smith were both involved in the preparation of the defence case in the ricin trial, and what they and the Porton evidence had to say was essentially that ricin is a one-on-one poison, not a weapon of mass destruction; that Kamel Bourgass' efforts to manufacture it were amateurish and had left no sign of having been successful; and that the distribution of ricin by smearing it on car door handles was not feasible, because it is not absorbed through the skin.

Experiments undertaken by Porton Down had made this clear at the trial (subtext: no ricin terror campaign), but these tests did no more than support the generally known facts about ricin. The Guardian has not yet responded to a Register request for an explanation for the story's removal, but The Insider reports that it was told the article was "removed from the archive for legal reasons", and that a further request for clarification received the response: "The article was not removed because of any inaccuracy. It was to do with a PII certicate protecting the identity of Porton Down experts who appeared as witnesses in the trial."

Campbell's piece had named a Porton scientist who had given evidence, but the names of Porton Down scientists are not a state secret. Or they weren't, anyway. A Public Interest Immunity Certificate is a relatively seldom-used legal mechanism for placing restrictions on evidence. According to the Crown Prosecution Service "the government now considers that where government documents or information are material to legal proceedings, PII will only arise if disclosure could cause real damage to a genuine public interest."

... continued at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. And a followup blog commenatary when the article reappeared
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. And there was the article too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Thank you
Intriguing information.
The removal was described as:
"Corrected version: this article has been restored to the website after being removed and corrected following a legal complaint"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,1585130,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Man, I was so far off on my answer...
I was thinking the publication of thier obituaries would boost thier approval ratings.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. If true, it should be pointed out
..that this terror plot was disrupted through GOOD POLICE WORK,
NOT by bombing, invading and occupying Middle Eastern Countries!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. I cross-linked this page.....
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 05:00 PM by Karenca
I figured that we American DU'ers
should see what your thoughts are on the phoney
terror alert.

Obviously, we all think the same! This post made the 'Greatest Page' too.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1872074
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. Blair might get a slight rise in the opinion polls, (1-2%)
but it will not last. I think too many people hate his guts for him to regain the popularity he had pre-2002.

As others have expressed in this thread the Blairists will seek to use this to push for further curbs on our civil liberties to 'protect' us in the name of counter-terrorism.

I don't know how this would play out in regards to Bush's ratings. I don't think any long term bounce will result for his poll ratings. The American public see too many problems with Bush and the Congress' handling of all sorts of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 29th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC