|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:05 PM Original message |
Valerie Jarrett on a public option, her actual point and reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Axlerod said the same thing on This Week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. It is very clear that Obama is willing to negotiate this. He isn't demanding anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I can see that your perception of reality is sparking outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Your perception of reality and that of those similar who cannot either listen or read to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Denial is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. Speaks the Queen of Denial. Did you even read this interview? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. "I hope I am wrong..." What are the chances that you are already? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. if I am wrong then so are many informed folks in DC. And they have much more info than I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. I have seen a lot of good alternatives to what the WH seems to be backing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
59. yes, Arne Duncan is another corportist who is working behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
61. she didn't vote for Obama. end of story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I agree with you entirely. saracat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 07:52 AM Response to Reply #8 |
54. Smug face? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Of course he's in the wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 08:00 AM Response to Reply #28 |
55. Yeah, and ain't it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
38. I can certainly understand why someone might be upset with the President seeming failure.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baltoman991
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Very clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 10:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
58. This is bad for the Progressives who are working hard for the public option--knowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. "He's not demanding that it's in there. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. "CASE CLOSED"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Until Obama says he won't sign a bill without a public option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. He did say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 08:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
56. He said it already in the past. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Case closed. The administration's own spokespeople back off the PO every couple of weeks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Yet it's alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It's Schrödinger's cat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Here's a pretty good argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. Pro, you're the only reply (next to mine) I see here. The rest are "ignored"s LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Only a few more weeks and the point will be moot. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Ugh, I can't wait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Yeah, keep on hoping and ignoring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Not exactly the way to boost one's crediblity, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Oooh, an image from someone who though a couple or RW idiots were making a "decent" argument n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. It was an interesting argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Ignoring what: That five of the four bills includes a public option? That Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Hoping does work actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Ooooh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. LOL I love how you tell someone you're on their ignore list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Waves at Hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. I see ya! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
47. which means what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
51. There are a lot of good points there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. "The fact that there's agreement on so much ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Be response! Rec +! ( wish it could be rec'ed! ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
25. I will push for Obama's reelection but I won't demand it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Isn't that the way it works? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Nicely done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. DUzy worthy, but probably not DUzy eligible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. And he wont demand your vote.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Some people don't seem to get the concept of failed analogy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. Maybe it could be just a "sliver" of the plan. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
40. Thanks (again) for the levelheadedness. I knew from all the "Obama has failed us" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
41. They should liken it to the post office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
45. What you read as strong, I read as weak at best... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 06:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. That is what worries me. I am fearful we will get crap and it will be hailed as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Oct-18-09 06:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. "Not much chance of a PO in the Senate bill." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 06:34 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Unlike some, I don't predict outcomes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
57. That's why I just focus on the words of the President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Mon Oct-19-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. He wants the PO is NOT the same as working hard FOR IT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC