|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:50 PM Original message |
How is Clark/Acxiom different from Cheney/Halliburton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. LOL - you guys are really scraping the bottom of the barrel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I don't think it is "scraping the bottom of the barrel" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyJay
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. Jerry Rice is awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Does anybody know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. He resigned from the board which means... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. From the WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I hope he does... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Fishbine, Here's the info about Clark and what he owns of Acxiom....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Still buying! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robforclark
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Actually, it shows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
44. So he stopped buying stock after declaring presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
63. Thanks for your research - any more links ? -eom- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
66. Entrust is just as bad as Acxiom. What's Wes's fixation w/ Homeland Sec? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. And here's a link to what Clark owns in his other Co. Entrust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. What does Entrust do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 08:11 PM Response to Reply #30 |
62. Well, do a quick Google, and see what you find. I'm not a Clark trasher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark Can WIN
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. nevermind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
67. See post 66 - Here's a little - Clark & Entrust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 04:43 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. My goodness, it looks like something Ashcroft would write |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. THIS again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Honestly, I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmaier
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. The issue is Clark profiting from the post 9/11 climate of fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. What bothers me is that the government lets this happen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Your candidate's involvement in it is not conjecture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. He was involved with the company - that much you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. He's still involved with two of his companies. That's okay by me....but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Not true: from Acxiom and Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 07:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. Powers of clairvoyance - impressive n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmaier
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Reasonable question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Perhaps you are right re: title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. I see your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Spy On Citizens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. My concerns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Let's be clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Amen HFISHBINE, Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Another point to consider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
38. Not only was he not involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. What he says and what he has done are two VERY different things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. Well, if you think he is a liar, then don't vote for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I WON'T vote for a liar and profiteer of fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 07:50 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Oh, hello again, I was away at the Clark blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. I appreciate your take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Shock? Axciom Is A Legitimate Company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. Please see my post #36 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 09:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
65. "Acxiom has heard of you. If you are like 95% of Americans..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
48. Let's say he's the nominee, who's going to bring this up? Ralph Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. That is of secondary concern to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
61. The primary concern to me is getting Bush out of the White House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. These VITAL questions need to be addressed by Clark - and SOON ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think there is a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. In a literal sense you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yeah ACXM is a real profit machine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. They're working on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That they are performing their fudiciary duty to the shareholders... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicdot
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. I don't think Acxiom making a profit, 'per se', is the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. Kissenger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
49. It's profitable if you acquire your shares at $0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. Part of the salary package... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. This is exactly what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Isn't that the technology that allows security people to see your genitals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
34. is it any different from Gore/Occidental oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Shhhh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 05:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. No, and thats why I am for Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
58. You're either kidding or in denial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. IBM is Vermont's largest employer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 06:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
53. Occidental Oil was spying on US citizens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Jan-08-04 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
57. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
69. It's nice to see so many democrats doing the dirty work of the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Call it crap if you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. You are doing more than vetting a candidate when you compare him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoneStarLiberal
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
71. Why Should I Care What Lieberman Staffers Think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 04:31 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. What you omit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoneStarLiberal
![]() |
Fri Jan-09-04 05:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Fair Play To You On That Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC