Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nate Silver: The Worst Pollster in the World Strikes Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:49 PM
Original message
Nate Silver: The Worst Pollster in the World Strikes Again
The Worst Pollster in the World Strikes Again
by Nate Silver @ 8:35 AM


Dirty little secret: I sometimes write material in the late evening that will be posted the following morning. This is one of those instances. The early word, however, is that a Zogby poll to be released today will show Barack Obama's presidential approval numbers at around 50-50.

As of this writing, the Pollster.com average has Barack Obama's numbers at 59.3 percent approve and 33.8 percent disapprove; the Real Clear Politics average is slightly more favorable to Obama, at 61.2 percent approve and 30.5 percent disapprove.

So a Zogby poll that put Obama's numbers at roughly 50-50 would be a significant outlier. Outliers are nothing new, however, when it comes to Zogby polls. They are, in fact, the rule and not the exception.

Let me qualify this a bit: Zogby International conducts two types of polls. One type are conventional telephone polls. Zogby's telephone polls, while prone to somewhat wild fluctuations and subject to their share of erratic results (such as predicting a 13-point win for Barack Obama in the California primary; Obama lost by 9 points), are actually not terrible, and did fairly well on November 4th.

Zogby, however, also conducts Internet-based polls. These polls are conducted among users who volunteer to participate in them, first by signing up at the Zogby website (you can do so yourself here) and then by responding to an e-mail solicitation. These Internet polls, to the extent they rely on voluntary participation, violate the most basic precept of survey research, which is that of the random sample. And as you might infer, they obtain absolutely terrible results.

more...

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/03/worst-pollster-in-world-strikes-again.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd~ Thank Goodness
for Nate Silver!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why does Zomby insist on using these dumb telephone polls when they are shown
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 12:52 PM by Jennicut
to be so inaccurate? Well, I know the answer to that. But still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Zogby is so predictable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. At about a 95% rate, their poll results are to be used as a political tool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Zogby's nonsenses convinced a lot of DU Obama haters that their boy McCain
was close in Pennsylvania.

Obama won by 11%.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That right there should have disqualified Zogby from ever being trusted again until he modifies his
methods to be less than 2 or 3 percent off from the actual results.

However, if a pollster claims that two candidates are virtually tied in a state, and one actually ends up winning by double-digits instead, that methodology must be questioned and discounted until fundamental changes are enacted to prevent such a disparity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. And remember his having McCain up by 1 nationally?
He lost a lot of credibility then.

Really, it seems he loves attention more than accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Before these silly Zogby International polls, he was at least a decent pollster
His numbers in 1996 and 2000 were not bad at all.

Internet polls are trash and always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. You can count on Morning Joe and other "media" to highlight this poll
Morning Joe and Fox will probably mention this during their entire show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. This will mostly be published to give Big Media something to blare about
But the far right doesn't seem to realize yet that no one is listening any more. Or at least it's the same tiny fraction of Dittiots that swallow all of their shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC