|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
deadlyaj
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 02:51 AM Original message |
Report: Clinton Camp Fabricated Initial Obama "Offer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 07:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Can he rescind an offer that he hasn't made? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. If he hadn't made the offer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I'm still waiting for evidence on that offer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. That he hasn't denied it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That's a very poor source of evidence. An administration can't spend its time denying all kinds ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yeah right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenziemom06
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. idiot is a bit harsh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Problem is, the transition team has done the opposite of "denying" it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. leaks aren't credible, and the opposite of denying is confirming, not remaining silent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Again, they are anything but silent about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. How is this article any different from a leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. How is the whole topic any different from a leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Exactly! This is all a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #21 |
30. But it makes sense doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:32 AM Original message |
The Obama camp leaks when it suits their purposes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
46. Obama can not control rumors that do humiliate people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. You don't get it do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. That's entirely possible but your assumption too is based on leaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I understand what you are saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I don't think we have any way of knowing whether or not Obama wants Clinton as SoS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #20 |
35. That has been my view ever since this started. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. I don't believe -correct me if I'm wrong- that anyone else has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyNameGoesHere
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
54. I guess because your argument is kind of lame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
55. the only things I find obvious about all this is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. No, thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
4. I don't believe a word of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. Yea, uh huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. Un-fucking-believable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Thank you. He didn't let her jerk him around during the primaries.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. It is genetic. These jerks just can't help themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. and by these jerks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #27 |
38. No, the people who are bashing anything Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. this injustice seems awful small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I believe he is doing a fantastic job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. Maybe Team Obama was well aware of the Emolument issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
17. *WHAM**WHAM**WHAM**WHAM* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
19. I've been saying this all along.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunnystarr
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Great assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Richardson has already been announced for Commerce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. I agree with your analysis and hope you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
24. why does she always have to be viewed as" the bad guy/gal" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Because the kooks on the left are as fascinated by her as the kooks on the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. exactly! It's so exasperating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Oh yeah, there are definitely plenty of kooks on the left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
31. More interesting to me is that she was planning to ignore Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
33. Clearly an unbiased and well sourced piece...of crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
34. You could have titled this post "Barack Obama - Weak Willed and Stupid" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
36. IF she muscled her way in, she's incredibly stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
40. LOL What A Nonsensical Article. How Dumb Would Someone Have To Be To Believe It For A Second? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Not dumb, disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. Seconded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chichiri
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
43. Recommenders, thank you for your concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
45. Sounds like the Clintons we all know and love, or not. n /t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
49. Meanwhile (an obvious Clintonie) at the NY Times reports: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
51. This must be the "bargaining" phase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC