|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:02 PM Original message |
TAKE THE MACH IV TEST & REPORT YOUR SCORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. I got a 45, described as "Low Mach" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. 55 -- still low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. 77 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fran Kubelik
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
108. i'm a 59 low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. 45 - low mach (thank goodness!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Mine was a 76 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Hi fellow sociopath! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
125. another 76 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. 37- low mach nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. 56 - Low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
78. 56 here too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
79. 56 here too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerrad
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
97. 57 Low mach n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
158. me too. 56 low mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. 42 - low mach. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. 59 - low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. that's odd my 63 is a 'high mach' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. surfing the cusp! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. I was just getting to that question myself...as mine is also 63... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Yeah, I got a 62 and thought the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. 40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Willo
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. 53 - Low Mach nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a kennedy
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. me too WIllo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redwitch
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
49. and me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. 83 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. 59 for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Howardx
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. 90 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. If you were would you admit it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ecumenist
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
17. I got 44...DEFINITELY LOW MACH...eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Genevieve
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. 62-High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Interesting -- I got a 59 which was "low mach" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Genevieve
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. I was thinking the same thing after I read your score. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
99. HIGH FIVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
163. I was 62 too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. "High Mach", but in my defense, I think it stems from my generally pessimistic view of the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Every minute, though? That's 1440 suckers per day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Has to be. How could someone possibly fall for the Nigerian email scam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:59 PM Original message |
Considering McCain won over 40% of the vote, someone must be replenishing the pool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #31 |
133. That's the McCain Palin voter base right there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
21. After working for a while, you can't help but go up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. 67 - High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. same here lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. lol.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. apparently we lean towards being cutthroat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. It looks to me like you think others lean toward being cutthroat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #58 |
157. ok--that makes a lot more sense! I think I'm more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
113. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MANative
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. 46 - low Mach. Not surprising to me. I tend toward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepBlueDem
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
26. 84- High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Big Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zingaro
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
82. This was me too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerrad
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
100. Oh dudes whats wrong with you, highest of all so far. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
27. 63 for me...High Mach...interesting...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwenu
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #27 |
60. Me too. 63 here. Anyone with a higher score is a cold calculating SOB, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #60 |
96. Yet another 63 and LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. 36--low Mach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. 53-Low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:55 AM Response to Reply #32 |
116. Fellow 53 here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
codjh9
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
33. 42... low mach... good. :^) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. "Are you a cutthroat or a pussycat? " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. 74. High Mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm whichever Mach is better for me at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Ah the 'flexible Mach' which of course is exactly what the original Mach was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pgh_dem
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
41. Not fair to Macchiavelli... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
89. One of Macchiavelli's critics said the same thing when the book first came out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
176. Yep, Macchiavelli was actually an early liberal thinker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
42. 52- Low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
45. I was a ~52~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaDem83
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I was a 70. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specialed
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
48. 69 :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpookyCat
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
50. 78 - High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
51. 40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
52. God! I don't think I like you people! 40. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimWis
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
53. 41 - Low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
54. Oh dear. 63. That's not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
90. People scoring in the 40s, 70s & 80s seem to be proud. Those in the 60s are ashamed of their scores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
55. 40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
56. 71...and I don't want to hear any shit about it...LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolo amber
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
57. Is this about shaving? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
59. 60 - I'm average |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Why am I disappointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJohn
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #59 |
136. me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
139. Me, too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chieftain
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
62. 51 low match. Ha ha I gamed the test. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 06:38 AM Response to Reply #62 |
119. 51 too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chieftain
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 09:16 AM Response to Reply #119 |
129. I was suggesting that I was being Machiavellian but the joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
64. 58 - low Mach. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #64 |
104. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
65. 68 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
66. This test is A ROVIAN TRAP!#!!$!!!11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
67. 50 - low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
68. 69 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joop
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
69. 64 - high mach nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
70. 53 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
71. 75. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
72. 56 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
73. Does this have anything to do with razer blades? I believe three should be the limit, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
74. 82 - Movin' on up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
75. 54- in the middle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #75 |
112. 54 here as well. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NEDem
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
76. 81 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
77. 20 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #77 |
147. can I borrow some money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:23 AM Response to Reply #147 |
152. of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayfoot
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
80. 57 - Low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
81. 79! And I thought I was so very sweet and innocent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveG
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
83. 66 -high Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
84. 50-Low Mach (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
85. 64 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jane_pippin
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
86. I had an essay question in HS History based on the last question there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #86 |
107. I am pretty much non-territorial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jane_pippin
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #107 |
127. Well that was sort of my reasoning, but the question in class was about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
87. Low Mach - 53. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
88. 62, but I cheated. I'm barely a Mach Daddy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
91. 46-LOW MACH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue_onyx
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
92. 54 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
93. 66 here.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
94. 52 Low Mach. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortyfeetunder
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
95. 75 (high Mach) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbeyRoad
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
98. 69 High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
101. 86 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
102. Mach 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
103. score: 57 - Don't know whether to be glad or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaiden
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
105. 55 -- low Mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
106. Your Machiavelli score is: 55 "low Mach". nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
109. 96 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
110. 50--I'm a low Mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
111. 84 and surprised it's not higher. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
114. 68 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
115. 53 - virtually in the middle of 0-100, but still "Low Mach" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
117. 84 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
118. 98 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
120. 81. wheee! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Borgnine
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
121. Jesus. I'm a 65. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetpotato
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
122. 78 - high mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
123. 55 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Of Four
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
124. 43- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
126. 66 -- high mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
128. 80, high mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyc 4 Biden
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
130. 67 - High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
131. 70 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #131 |
161. 70, as well. Guess we probably wouldn't be friends, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #161 |
165. Oh, I don't know. What's in it for me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
132. I Got A 58 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
134. 53-low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
135. 60 average --- but 59 is Low?? Hmmm arbitrary definitional categorization?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaJudy
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
137. 54 - Low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldmant
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
138. 40 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
140. 48 low |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
141. Damn! I tried to force it to give me 100 but only got 92... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RayOfHope
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
142. Geez, 69. I don't like that score, too high for me! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
143. I'm a real shitheel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
144. 80 - High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
145. 61--high mach n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
146. ha! perfect score - in your face, losers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #146 |
167. you got a zero mach? good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #167 |
170. I didn't get a zero... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
148. 48 - low Mach. not surprised. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KathieG
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
149. 68 - High |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomnjoy
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
150. 53 - low mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
151. I still believe I am Mach1 ... regardless of what this says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
153. 77 - High Mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
154. 69- High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
155. 71-High Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
156. 68 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
159. 57 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
160. 54 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
162. 92 ...I'm a bad boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
164. 41.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
166. 60, I am just an average mach---- maybe we should put these in our signatures so we know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
168. Your Machiavelli score is: 78 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
169. What's in it for me to tell you my score? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
171. low Mach here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
172. Wow, I am 37. Not surpised, I am a Sag-Capricorn and we are known as ultra idealistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rexy
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
173. Haha. 77. High Mach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
174. I refuse to believe that an online 20-question personality test deserves any creedence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
175. 55, Low Mach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher
![]() |
Mon Nov-24-08 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
177. 87 High Mac |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC