|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 09:55 PM Original message |
There's some excitement going on over in General Discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm afraid to wish for too much, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope it lives up to the excitement coming from the OP n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Check out my edit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FARAFIELD
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:05 PM Original message |
The poster doesnt know shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kdillard
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
45. The OP never said anything about October but did say it could happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Does anybody know the OP? Are they in some loop that would know something juicy before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Longtime poster so who knows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. One of the best we've got and well worth a look on any topic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Well, that makes this more interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
40. Hey there. And howdy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. What you just posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Hi, Kristi. I think it would be just great if the GOP woke up one of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. Really? The poster sounds like a lunatic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Because he/she is sworn to secrecy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. "sworn to secrecy"? From posting on an anonymous message board? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. The source tells you something that very few people know. The next day it's all over the internet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Why didn't the poster himself wait and see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Excitement, eager to hint at good news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. What have we got here a deepthroater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Dirty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
42. If the poster was REALLY sworn to secrecy, there would have been no OP in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. 9/11 MIHOPper... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Oh. Well then we can lock the thread then. :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. No... I'm just saying that's another thing that was going to "go wild" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyCougar
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. It seems pointless to speculate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. THIS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. I edited the OP again. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TooRaLoo
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not getting my hopes up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curtland1015
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. I wish I could pretend to care... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. As someone said in one of those links, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. Ohmygoodness Ohmygoodness Ohmygoodness - IT'S CHRISTMAS??!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. Excuse me if I don't hold my breath... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. You're excused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. My apologies - really! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Lol. This is a pretty pathetic parade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FARAFIELD
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
43. A long track record of being lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. What you said. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. Two Words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
51. Off topic-I would ask if I could use your sig image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
74. Here's what I dont get..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 05:47 AM Response to Reply #17 |
84. Don't tell anyone but John McCain is Trig's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. DU Member 'seafan' is pointing in a possible direction--Abramoff connection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. I'm thinking Keating 5.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Who knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curtland1015
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Last twenty four? More like last 72! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Just when I read lonestarnot's "a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waiting For Everyman
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Thanks Kristi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
39. I have no insights to offer on possible realizations but believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Thanks OC. That puts a different light on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. DCBob, howdy & happy September. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I think it's about the lobbyist Iseman affair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I was watching that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. The Iseman story makes alot of sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 05:55 AM Response to Reply #58 |
85. I was surprised the most important part of the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Ah, those friendly lobbyists! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:08 AM Response to Reply #53 |
72. He said that lawyers were the ones who are behind this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #50 |
77. I'm hoping for a long-lost gay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
46. Put up or shut up - this is all just BULLSHIT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
47. Not going to have any expectations. I'll just wait and see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
49. I work for a pretty prominent Democrat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #49 |
76. So what do they look like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
52. Looks like it could be Keating 5... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. That's what I gather, checking into the 2 links you added. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. The OP is also playing coy re: Vicki Iseman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #52 |
68. If it is, what would be bad enough to almost sink him? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chasing Dreams
![]() |
Mon Sep-08-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
60. Whatever it is, I hope we have several of the following to stop the Liars in their tracks: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
61. Maybe the Russians have been busy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
62. I just can't get my hopes up anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
63. lonestarnot said "Thanks Keith".....clue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. You and I both NYC_SKP. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:53 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. 8 minutes to breaking news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. CNN scooped us on Biden, ya'd think that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Why would it be 11 pst? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #71 |
75. lonestarnot hinted that it might break tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:03 AM Response to Reply #63 |
69. It's 11 p.m. PDT right now. I haven't got an idiot box, though. I'm going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:06 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Don't have it, let us know if anything pops up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
65. At 2:01am I better not be disapointed. lolz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:11 AM Response to Reply #65 |
73. which time zone? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agent William
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
78. I......I..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
79. Thish iz ID!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
80. Maybe it's the "Palin Billed State" story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 05:07 AM Response to Original message |
81. Wow, you found something retarded in GD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
82. John McCain Will be Indicted in Five Business Days? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya
![]() |
Tue Sep-09-08 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
83. There's nothing about some huge surprise at talkingpointsmemo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC