|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:01 PM Original message |
So Hillary attacks Edwards for his support of China trade relations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. A hypocritical attack? In *this* primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. She has no shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Can you help me with this. She signed the bill in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. Pot-kettle-black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. So she is accusing Edwards of doing somehting that she signed the bill for? I don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Noted foe of working folk Ted Kennedy also voted for the China bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Indeed. Ted Kennedy is not running for President on the strength of what a great fighter he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. So, you're saying Hillary Clinton signed the bill in 2000. I'm confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Hillary didn't sign it, it was in 2000. But it's a bill her husband favored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. And so, ummm, since he wanted it, She wanted it right. That's what you're saying. She has no mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You've got a point there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. She busted Bill's nut on NAFTA...she said @ a Debate she disagreed with him on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Well, there ya go. I didn't know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. You know that Hillary and Barak vote 94% the same don't you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Yes, I am aware of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. Does she have a policy position on rescinding NAFTA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. No, Bill Clinton signed it into law in October 2000 while he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. So you're saying she agreed with the bill then. You're saying she has no mind of her own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. he's as bad as me...losing strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. And it is a lie. Edwards has opposed EVERY trade bill in his career except this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. Is this "Clinton Robo Call" thread #7, or #8? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. I think there is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. Rich, ain't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. She gets away with being called progressive. Bless her and big warm forgiving hugs. =) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Hillary and Obama vote 94% the same. So, you're putting Obama's progressiveness in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billybob537 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. Wow Rovian Projection. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. Take a look at all the Dems who voted for the China Trade Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Seeing the "good guy" Dems voting for this makes me think there was something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Has anyone here researched that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Edwards, I believe, has said part of the problem is China never held up its end of the bargain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. YES!!! That is why the punks who swiftboat Edwards NEVER. NEVER post the roll call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Ha! "It looked good on paper..." Despite all the politics and games, I still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Wow! Boxer? Kennedy? Edwards?? Bunch o' right-wing nuts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Ted Kennedy is rethug lite! Vote Obama, the only true progressive in Congress! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. You must be fucking joking. Obama ain't no progressive. He votes the same as Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I am sarcastically echoing what Obamites have been saying for a year about Edwards and Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I gotcha! How they believe he's so progressive is so beyond me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
29. Its about the hypocrisy of Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. Stop slinging that shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Can you post Edwards' record on trade? Thank you in advance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Self Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Can you delete that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Sorry. Thought you were asking me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Edwards voted for most favored nation status for China |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. sneakers why don't you post Edwards' record on trade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I didn't know I was responded to until a minute ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC