Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If this is true, we have a big problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:47 PM
Original message
If this is true, we have a big problem
From a kos diary:

Widespread Cheating & Vote Suppression by Clinton Campaign in Clark County, NV
by thereisnospoon
Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 02:19:31 PM PST


Hey everyone,

I'm reporting in from one of the Obama field offices in Clark County, NV. My girlfriend and I just came back from being the precinct captains at our caucus, and the scene here is ugly.

Everyone is reporting election irregularities on the part of the Hillary campaign. There is widespread cheating and voter suppression going on all over Clark County--and it's obviously coming in from the top down. Whether it made enough of a difference to swing the election is another question--but there is no question that Hillary was running a scorched-earth, no-holds-barred campaign in which all of her surrogates were instructed to cheat in every way possible.

thereisnospoon's diary :: ::
To be clear about the caucus process here: caucus doors opened at 11am today; people are allowed to file in and register on location until 12 noon, at which time the doors close and no one else is admitted. Those registering were given non-binding ballots to fill out to help assess in case of problems with head count. At this point, the total number of people in the room are counted. Viability is determined (15%), and then the viable sections have 20 minutes to convince the uncommitteds/unviables. Final counts are then made.

Here are just a few of the irregularities from the Clinton campaign that have come to my ears, before I tell my own story. Word on the ground is that we have video of some of these shenanigans as well.

No less than foureight Obama captains (including myself) have reported that Clinton operatives tried to close the doors at 11:30--a full thirty minutes before the doors were supposed to close. In some cases I am hearing they actually succeeded, and voters were turned away before more knowledgeable people could get there to reopen them. The Clinton campaign had obviously told their people to be there by 11:30--and they knew that the higher the turnout, the worse for them.
At least two reports of Clinton operatives telling the uncommitteds and Edwards supporters, once their numbers were deemed not viable, that they had to leave. Whether these tactics succeeded or not, I do not know. Obviously, the Clinton campaign knew that voters not already in her camp were unlikely to join her camp (I know from my own experience that I convinced many more undecideds than my opponent Hillary operative), so they attempted to suppress their vote.
At least one report of Clinton operatives telling Obama supporters with viable numbers that they were not viable, and had to leave. From what I hear, some of those voters did in fact leave.
At least two reports (including my own) of disabled voters being coerced into the Clinton camp against their will, or even having their voter card filled out for them against their will.
A few reports of probable out-of-state Clinton operatives being counted among the voters--though since checking ID is illegal, and other Hillary operatives from in-state would vouch for them, it's impossible to say.
At least one report of two large men standing outside the door checking voters for whom they would support, and telling all Obama people they were at the wrong location.
At least one other report of Hillary operatives doing the check-in, and telling all Obama supporters that they were not on the list, could not register at the location (not true), and that they could not caucus.
At least one report of ballots being filled out in advance for Hillary in mass.
At least one report of Hillary supporters saying that the caucus location was just the Hillary room--and that Obama supporters had to go to a faraway location.
At least one report of a voter registration list only in Spanish, and only with Hillary supporters on it. Obama supporters later found the registration list with the rest of the people--in the garbage can of the ladies restroom.
Several reports of Hillary signs on the registration table, and Hillary supporters in Hillary shirts doing registration.
And there's much, much more. It's only just getting started to come through. How many of these tactics worked is unclear. Certainly, aggressive Obama volunteers like myself should have nipped many of these in the bud, but we're actually counting on concerned citizens who care--not machine operatives trained to cheat and brought up in the nearly criminal Nevada machine and the ruthless, conscience-less Hillary campaign.

Here's my story:

I got to the location at 10:30am and set up. The Hillary people were already there. In charge of them was a 60-ish woman with a Brooklyn accent. Here were the irregularities in my precinct alone:

The Hillary operative tried to force the doors to close at 11:30am. KK was outside greeting people, and she overheard the Hillary campaign mention that the doors would be closing at 11:30am, and she went to talk to the precinct chair. So we intervened and said that that was absolutely not legal by the rules. She then started screaming at the chair to close the doors. When he read the rules that they were open until 12noon, she said that "that's not what I was told, other campaigns were spreading misinformation." We stood our ground, and the doors remained open.
A man in a wheelchair came in with his daughter, and said he was an Edwards supporter. When his daughter began to wheel him to the middle of the room, the Hillary operative tapped her on the shoulder, took the wheelchair and took him to the Clinton corner. I rushed over from talking to an undecided voter and objected loudly, but his daughter was a Hillary person. The Clinton operative said, "I don't control what he does; she does." At that point I said to the man, "Nobody controls you. If you want to vote for Edwards, you have every right to go to the center of the room. Do you need help?" He looked at me plaintively, but said nothing as his daughter dragged him farther back into the corner and just shook his head.
The Clinton operative herself had a Brooklyn accent and I overheard her mention having been from New York. When she stood to be counted in the middle of the room, I objected and asked her if she was actually from Nevada. She said yes. I talked to the chair and asked him to ask her name and find her on the list. He asked her her name and checked the list, and she was not on it. At this point the chair said, "well, I can't ask for ID." I said, "She can't participate if no one will vouch for her." At this point a Hispanic man wearing a Hillary shirt said she was his wife. While that's not impossible, it was also improbable--but I had no way to verify or object further.
One voter who hadn't even finished registering said that she was undecided, and the Hillary operative physically escorted her to the Hillary side. I went to talk to the woman, but she was immediately surrounded by 3 Hillary supporters who would not let me in, and I had to attend to others registering at that point (our operatives were outnumbered by hers 2-1).
Hillary supporters were doing check-in, and a Hillary sign was behind them. I forced the sign off the table, and I went to the front desk to verify that everything went according to the rules at checkin--but if nothing else, the necessity of doing so prevented me from doing other needed work.
Even so, KK and I managed to convince 6 undecided/Edwards voters (Edwards & uncommitted both lacked viability in my caucus), while their cheating, ruthless operatives only convinced two--and our caucus outperformed the field, garnering 4 delegates to her 5. It was intense--and it was war. I knew what the Clinton operatives were up to, and they knew I knew. It was bloodless war; I almost feel pity for the goodhearted Obama volunteers who were unprepared for the level of sociopathy that I expected--and encountered--from the Clinton campaign.

--------------------------------------

After being a part of this campaign, doing this work, and seeing this level of viciousness from a supposedly Democratic candidate, it will be a cold day in hell before I do any work for anyone in any way associated with Hillary Clinton. At this point, even my general election vote is in question. I am furious almost to the point of nausea. There are so many young, idealistic activists here who are absolutely crushed--not because we lost here, but because of the way we "lost." Disillusionment is running extremely high--and I doubt very much of many of them will be back in 2008, or ever again. Illegal and immoral campaign tactics like this aren't just reprehensible: they also come at a cost to the party in the long run.

Leaving behind the triangulating, DLC politics of the Clintons, this crap leaves me with just one question: with Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/19/162953/644/790/439573
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Duck, cali, duck! Incoming!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I know, but I found this both credible and disturbing
and you know that I'm not out to damn Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. riiiiight...
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 08:06 PM by TankLV
but it is disturbing none the less...

what I saw was WAY too "casual" and way too totally disorganized.

I just showed up to vote, and some of those in charge didn't even know what to do...

but here is was not anywhere as bad as what they were saying on KOS...

and ALL of us - Obama and Clinton supporters/voters were working TOGETHER to try to make is through successfully...

but I didn't like the "official" process one bit...

Harry's an ass and should be ashamed of himself for creating this mess in the first place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. I would hope it would be investigated and things done. I AM SICK
OF THIS SHIT! If it was bad with bush, then it is here too. No alibiing this away. Fix it, track it, find the culprits and put their fucking asses in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. Call DK. He'll straighten this out! He always does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
95. Please remind me in November
Of how heroic the Kooch geberally ends up being.

Hillary will carry california without my vote, and I will be damned in hell before I give it to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. seems to me have been lots of voter intimination by Unions-but people got their
backs up and said go the heck, i will vote for whom I want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Do you have any proof, whatsoever, of "voter intimidation by unions"
or are you just continuing to talk out of your ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
58. no more proof than the op has of voter intimidation by Clinton
and yet this gets traction with Obama's crew. Double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #58
75. There is proof that she tried to disenfranchise the voters of Nevada.
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 04:15 PM by JTFrog
Sadly it's Democracy that is the big loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmm.......
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. I'll take extra butter on mine!
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 11:06 PM by DianaForRussFeingold
:popcorn: Kucinich and Edwards are FDR Democrats ;)

:blush: Clinton and Obama?
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_stephen__071223_edwards_is_fdr_with_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. What happened, happened... we need to move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That is an absolutely terrible attitude to take when it comes to voter supression
For shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I hate voter supression, but nothing will be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Horsecrap. You don't walk away from voter suppression.
And something will be done... the Obama camp needs to do a better job of training their ground team in the art of hardball in upcoming caucus states.

The only way past this is through it. Gotta fight harder. Gotta work harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. No. You. Don't! Doing nothing is acceptance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. good point
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM by tigereye
often, supporters of a particular candidate who are precinct or ward captains, are much more trained in moving their candidate forward and are also often the same folks who have worked in the Dem party caucauses and election/ registration tables in their district or county, for years. It's a matter of experience, I think.

But to play push and pull with voters who want to caucus for their/ a different candidate and to bend the rules to make it seem like someone has to follow their lead, is unconscionable if true.



Hardball is hardball. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
64. Just wait until the general
when all of the integrity issues are aired repeatedly, non-stop, 24/7.

Karma is a helluva thing.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
85. nothing will be done
Right there we have the reason for the party not having more electoral success.

The shoulder-shrugging acceptance of "the way things are." This is the terrible vulnerability that comes with being the "reality-based community." We only look in the rear view mirror.

"The poor will always be there."

"The people want security, and are willing to trade away liberty. What can we do? That is the reality."

"Money rules. What can you do? That is the way it is."

"Politics have always been dirty, and always will be."

We compromise and compromise on the most fundamental principles and ideals until the party is nothing more than a hollow shell of what it once was.

"Some men see things as they are and ask 'why?' I dream things that never were and ask, 'why not?'"
- Robert F. Kennedy, 1968

It is long past time that we again become the ideals and principles based community - yes, the idealism and big dream community - instead of the reality-based community.

I reject this reality. It is a nightmare. I will not base my politics on this reality. “I have a dream…”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. personally I think this needs nationwide exposure...
I have caucused...and even became a delegate....since when can't someone be asked for ID??? before we could caucus in my state...we had to prove who we were.. show our voter registration card, and sign in...IF someone didn't have ID...they had to leave ...caucuses are not for the faint of heart...and personally, I am glad we went to the primary system here, everyone gets one vote, one time...ask me if I believe what the OP is writing could have taken place....my response...you betcha...no doubt whatsoever...should we act like this didn't take place and just move on to the next one....not just no, but hell no!!Since when does any Democrat get off feeling that it's ok to strong arm voters??...Isn't that exactly what we've been bitching about for the last 8 years(everyone remembers election fraud, right?? so now it's ok if we do it too?????)....wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
97. You can't be serious
That sounds like a Pelosi comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now will the obama supporters finally agree that a caucus sucks.
I believe Barack stacked it in Iowa.

The rules are fast and loose, it is not a good system.

And that comes from a Hillary supporter, but like i did, you will just have to accept this and move on. Or you will be said to be sour grapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. I posted earlier that I am against this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4115096&mesg_id=4115188

But everyone needs to realize that similar tactics can happen with a secret vote. The only way to prevent it is to have some members of opposing parties at every polling location. If you are the minority party but have one or two other people to back you up, the instance of shenanigans will go way down.

Anyone who cares about this should, if they possibly can, work the polls on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Konza Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jesus, if any of this is true, I am sickened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. A perfect example
Of why there should be no "caucus", just a primary vote where every person can vote their own conscience without being bullied, or without the dirty tricks you posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
60. Exactly. A national primary. One day. It's done. No BS, no media or small states tilting the
results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
99. Interesting Op-ed in Wisconsin State Journal about 4 primary dates
Sorry I can't find a link for it. Maybe you could google it? Writer felt one national primary would benefit those with the most money. He thought that having 4 national primaries, one each month from March through June would be more fair. To make it even more fair, the 12 or 13 states with the lowest population would vote first, followed by the next least-populated, and the most populated (most delegates) on the last primary in June.

Seemed an intersting idea. Any thoughts?

I hope the OP's post is not accurate, but fear that it is. Sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Stuff like this is to be expected
from a republican. Where is Karl Rove these days? K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Clintons are a political machine that knows how to play dirty?
Say it isn't so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not surprising one bit. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary's lawyers threw Obama poll checkers out in New Hampshire...
So why would anyone not think they would resort to dirty tactics in Nevada? I will be working next Saturday during the primary here in SC....I'll be able to give a first-hand account then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is Clinton's worse possible outcome
1) she now becomes the front runner. If she goes up no one notices if she goes down its big news.

2) The media loves a race they will do everything to keep the race going Obama will get get coverage.

3) Again in front Clinton narcissism returns and everyone remembers what it was that irritated them so much

4) All of the anybody but Hillary will coalesce behind a single candidate - no more triangulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. You should find a way to present what you wrote here and present it directly to her
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 07:56 PM by higher class
in some way - say that if you don't hear from her, you will assume that she is aware of what went on and approves. Registerd mail, if nothing else, with a copy to her top manager. Get the name of that representative and the guy who claimed she was his wife. It's kind of a big deal, it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is why the Dems kept their mouths shut about the last couple of elections...
If they said anything, they would have to stop using the very same tactics. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Maybe that explains it, but I think not - no proof, no knowledge - just the reality
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 08:10 PM by higher class
that I can't bear to think that Rove has a counterpart in the Democratic Party whether 'he' is as good as Rove or not. If we believe that both groups cheat at the top cheat, we might as well move a step forward and believe something that is possibly obvious and said here when enough people on DU are angry with Dem leaders - that there is zero difference in the agenda at the top of both parties and only the propaganda package is different. If yes, who runs the show in the Dem Party - I would say the DLC. Based only on my ultimate low opinion of them.

(Whenever I say anything negative about the DLC - no one ever tries to convince me otherwise.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. If this is true, no way will I vote for her in the general election, she is no better than
what Bush did in the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah. It happens, but you try to overcome that with people- and we came close
we expect this from certain campaigns. It's this sort of loutish behavior (amply demostrated by the 44's here at DU) that we expect. In a close contest , it means the difference between a loss and a win.

Remember, "Win at any costs" is a mantra from the establishment crowd.

Our message remains the same. Our tactics will not change. The fact that we are confronted with this is indicative of a certain desperation. The world is not as stupid as they believe.

It's still change and hope vs fear and loathing. Some things that happen in Vegas, should stay in Vegas.

On to North Carolina!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. It pays to have the machine on your side
All that chicanery and she only won by five points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Has everyone simply SLEPT through the last 15 years?
Shit on a stick!

WHY is any of this coming as a suprise to ANYONE who REMOTELY follows politics?

The VRWC wouldn't exist if there wasn't some truth to their overblown distortions.

AMERICA -- WAKE THE FUCK UP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
96. I know, I know - I don't know which makes me more anguished
That people don't expect this, or that it is happening.

Well I guess that it is happening makes me sicker, but still,by now you'd think that people would know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. this cracks me up. Yesterday when there were complaints from
Clinton's supporters that there was widespread pressure put on voters--many on DU said, complaints with no proof is just plain stupid.

Double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
83. this is typical Clinton
bitch about your opponent pulling dirty tricks when you are, in fact, the ones pulling those dirty tricks. See how that works? It looks like a wash to most people and you get to keep pulling the same crap only the media is too stupid to report anything other than, "gee, it sure is a negative campaign with accusations of dirty tricks on both sides"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Note to mods...

in the future, please don't remove any posts pointing out connections between the Clintons and BCCI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. /
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 10:21 PM by annie1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
91. Is it ok to question why Marc Rich was pardoned?
RICH CERTAINLY WASN'T SOME WRONGLY ACCUSED INNOCENT:

But tax evasion was just the final piece of the Rich indictment.

Rich was also charged with a complex oil scam that exploited America’s energy crisis in the early ’80s. The 65-count indictment claimed he had secretly bought up millions of barrels of Texas crude oil then under strict price controls and relabeled the oil as decontrolled supplies, ultimately selling it on the open market for huge profits — reportedly $100 million.

And while 52 Americans were held hostage in Iran, Rich’s company allegedly made another fortune by trading with the Ayatollah Khomeini’s regime in violation of a strict American trade embargo.

Rich and his partner were then charged with failing to pay U.S. taxes on the profits.

-snip

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3071886
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. This is interesting, Lewis Libby was one of Marc Rich's attorneys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
100. I didn't know we could give orders to the moderators.
Is this new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. Shhhhhhh, don't wake them up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. The most despicable part of these allegations...
... is the way they appear to have directly fucked with Edwards supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
65. Viability is the downside to the caucus system
Those votes are erased for all intents and purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tashca Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. I call BS
This is plain and simply a hit piece.
I heard the same stupid and ridiculous allegations put out on the caucus's here in Iowa...
Have you seen any of them come to fruitation???....no...
I continue to be surprised so many people fall for such crap....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
66. Hit piece? It is one of a dozen first hand accounts of what went down yesterday.
I don't care WHO your candidate is -- this is filthy activity. Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tashca Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. I heard the same ridiculous crap here in Iowa
Why do people fall for this??...I don't understand why everyone takes everything said as fact.
If their candidate did better than expected then everything is fine. If their candidate does fails to do as expected then they cry not fair. Maybe someone ought to just admit their particular candidates campaign failed.
I heard a constant barrage of this crap here in Iowa....I have yet to see proof any of these internet stories be the truth.
Maybe.....just maybe people should check for actual verification before believing the first thing that comes along to agree with their particular view of the world.
I was a Biden supporter.....I have not made a chose as to who I want now. These three don't come close to adding up. I'll take what I get and live with it.....It's that damn simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is appalling. Since when is Karl Rove on Hillary's staff?
I'm at a loss for words. I can't believe these tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. The OverLords will not be thwarted without a fight.
Thanks for re-posting this. I don't go to Kos as often as I used to because it runs soooo slowly, compared to most of the other progressive websites.

I don't know if it's the ads, or all those diaries with hundreds and hundreds of responses, taking too long to load up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. i hope this is looked into. but so we've heard from others that...
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 10:23 PM by annie1
the caucuses were a mess in general, and that hillary people were there first and organizing. and if there was as we saw that it was overflowing and crazy, we can't assume that it was dirty more so than just chaotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. If all of this did happen...
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 11:34 PM by TwoSparkles
...then these are very serious allegations, and those precinct captains and the other
witnesses, need to come forward and tell their stories.

Seriously. If someone was a witness to this kind of intimidation, from ANY precinct captain
or person attending the caucus, then those kinds of dirty tricks need to be verified, discussed
in public and the offending parties need to be held accountable.

This should not stand in America...from ANY candidate. Someone should be working with those
precinct captains and the people who were intimidated---to come forward--if indeed this stuff
is true.

With that said...I'm wondering...is this stuff really true?

I caucused in Iowa and I was a precinct captain. I'm not saying I know every nuance that happened in
Nevada, but I do understand the process very well. There is a "precinct chair" at every caucus, as
well as precinct captains for every candidate. In addition, there are supposed to be "observers"
and I know the media is crawling all over the place.

I don't understand how a Clinton supporter can "scream" that the doors should be closed a half hour
earlier.

I'm trying to envision this happening, and it just does not hold up. We had 240 people caucusing
in my precinct, and I can't imagine ANY precinct captain getting away with behavior like this.
All of those citizens...the precinct chair, the other captains----and this was allowed--across the
board? The Hillary precinct captains would have no more power than any other precinct captain. If
a precinct captain tried to change rules or behave unfairly the Precinct Chair would have put the kabash
on that.

I will say this, if turnout was high--this could have made these kinds of tactics easier. Chaos can
create a less orderly process. Plus, if there are a ton of "new" participants, who haven't caucused before,
then many of the caucus goers may not know what is right or wrong--and they're more likely to follow
along because they don't know what is normal.

If this stuff is true, there is no way that the story is going away. The story is out--if these people come
forward to reveal their stories and they are credible--then maybe some supression happened. If the story dies, I think we should
assume that maybe there were some bad things that happened, but not a widespread voter suppression effort on the
part of one campaign.

I think it's important to remember than precinct captains do not always reflect the values and wishes of
the campaign. You can't blame the general campaign for the actions of a few idiots. If one or two Hillary
precinct captains acted like this, then what happened was unfortunate, and more about those individuals, than
the campaign in general. However, if this is widespread--there is no way this story will be contained. Witnesses
will come forward and some of Hillary's own precinct captains will reveal that they were trained this way. The
truth will surface, if this indeed happened.

Let's hope not. I really hate this shit. I'm an Obama supporter, but I was sickened by the poll/vote result
differential and I was relieved to hear that the final result (last I heard) were similar to the hand counts.

I guess we'll all wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
67. Iowa is the exception. They are the grand master of the system
after doing it successfully for so many years.

Nevada tried this yesterday for the first time since the 1960s or some such thing and it was an uncoordinated circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. Anyone watching the Caesar's Palace caucus live on CNN...
... saw the Temporary Chair completely ignore the Edwards supporters in the room. One of the Edwards people had to yell out to her, "What if you're for Edwards?" to get her to notice she hadn't bothered to count them, let alone acknowledge them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. This would explain Lee Mercer's mysteriously weak showing in the NV caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. And here we go again. How'd that NH recount go, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Obama's campaign didn't THINK that would change the results. This is different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #43
68. i think they went pretty well. As expected from the past record of electronic vote counting,
there were errors found in almost all the precincts.<p>

It helps to bolster the argument that we shouldn't rely on electronic voting/counting.<p>

Or do you think it works just fine?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. Did you see this thread? They're going to fully investigate it!:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. Now we know what happened to Edwards votes
This is really pathetic. They took advantage of people and bullied them. Says a lot about the candidate. Clinton should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. did someone videotape this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercerForPrez Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
48. From being on the ground in Clark county, this is what I saw:
Massive downward cast eyes and condescending snickers when I showed up in my Lee Mercer, Jr. raiment. I was roundly booed and heckled at my Lee Mercer, Jr. table and left in tears. Drove home sobbing to Vanessa Carlton...here I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
49. I think the caucuses have to go
I've heard so many stories out of Iowa that were equally appalling. We need to have primary elections in all the states - one person, one vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
50. K&R No surprise
We see how many of the Hillary supporters behave here on DU... Mark Penn=Karl Rove... You are judged by the company you keep, is it any wonder Hillary has such high negatives, or why so many otherwise loyal Dems say they absolutely will not vote for her in the GE? And... only the most poisoned by the koolaid Hillbots will refuse to see and acknowledge that this comes from the top...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
51. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
52. Read this post by Emit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2724483

They say something about "closing the doors at 11:30." It seems to be a misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
53. More hysterics from the Obama supporters
Hmmm, Daily KOS, now theres an unbiased source of information on the Clinton campaign. :rofl::rofl::rofl: Nameless, faceless, "Hillary operatives," in dark cloaks planting banana peels for Obama voters to slip on. This is getting pathetic. Could you imagine these people in a general election? Every time Obama loses a state they will go into hysterics, this is the pattern. Hands down most thin skinned campaign in history.

Obama supporters rarely tout Obama. Instead all they do is fear, smear, and run around hysterically screaming, "the sky is falling! the sky is falling!" This is going to be a long year, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
54. What you say in your last sentence begs the question why?
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 10:35 AM by midnight
What does coporate america have to gain from causing Democrates internal problems? We are being set up folks......How do we work with those being paid huge sums of money to create chaos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
55. i just read your story..sounds exactly like the caucus i was a co-chair to in Iowa..only ..
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 11:47 AM by flyarm
and i say only..not lightly..it was the exact same scenerio only it was Obama people doing what you described!

to the "T"..

fly

oh and i was there to help with the cacus for Edwards...the Clinton people did nothing out of line where i was..but the Obama people..ahhh they were crooked as all get out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. If this is true, we have a big problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
62. I think this could have happened, but I don't think it reflects on HRC at all. It tells me that
there are aggressive selfish people out there that will resort to some pretty primal instincts to get it done. It sounds to me like it is a systematic problem of caucuses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
63. It is an olde tyme political trick to accuse your opponent of what you are doing.
Bill Clinton is using every Rove-inspired trick in the book to win at any cost, all the while yelling "cheater!" while the Clinton campaign is systematically gaming the system.

It makes my skin crawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. obviously you didn't see where the same thing happened in Iowa where who won..Oh Obama!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. The Clintons tried to suppress the vote in Iowa as well.
And in Iowa, the Clinton campaign -- with the help of the state's largest newspaper, the Des Moines Register, which endorsed her -- was discouraging students from returning from winter break to vote, even though their right to do so was legal, said Rick Hasen, who writes a respected election law blog. "Indeed such voting could help to compensate for the otherwise anti-democratic nature of Iowa's role in the presidential election process," he said.

As the nomination process has unfolded and Clinton has encountered resistance in every state so far -- including Obama's Friday endorsement by the 60,000-member Las Vegas Culinary Workers Union -- her campaign's increasingly critical rhetoric has been accompanied by voter suppression tactics aimed at her rival's core voters.

While Clinton campaign surrogates have verbally accused Obama of many things, from "fairy tale" answers on Iraq to being a drug user while they served the country more nobly, intentionally suppressing voters -- especially under-represented, low-income minority union members -- stands out in 2008's Democratic presidential campaign.

link in my sig line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I refer you to post #58, could it be a case of both trying to out do the other in "shady" practices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Your spin on behalf of the ClintonCo Slime Machine is admirable, but the truth is stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. Oh I see if you don't like it it's spin huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. More accurately it is you pee'ing on my leg and telling me it's raining.
The facts are in my sig line. Ignoring the facts is your prerogative, but the truth prevails regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. there's just as many "anecdotes" about Obama as there are about Clinton,
so who's ignoring "facts" is subjective at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
74. Your anecdote is very biased.
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 04:22 PM by bluedawg12
Your thread needs a closer look because it is biased as heck and you are as much an “operative” as anyone you have written about.



>> Here's my story:“I got to the location at 10:30am and set up. The Hillary people were already there.”<<

So what? They worked hard and got there before you.

>>In charge of them was a 60-ish woman with a Brooklyn accent.<<

What does a Brooklyn accent in Nevada mean? Nothing. You are perhaps implying something here, but it seems unfounded.

>>Here were the irregularities in my precinct alone:

>>The Hillary operative tried to force the doors to close at 11:30am.<<

OK, your language. You could be called an Obama operative. It could be said you tried to “force” the doors open till noon.

>>KK was outside greeting people, and she overheard the Hillary campaign mention that the doors would be closing at 11:30am, and she went to talk to the precinct chair. So we intervened and said that that was absolutely not legal by the rules.

She then started screaming at the chair to close the doors.<<

Screaming? Loaded imagery.

>>When he read the rules that they were open until 12noon, she said that ‘that's not what I was told, other campaigns were spreading misinformation.’ <<

She may have indeed been given misinformation, and it upset her, just as closing the doors at 11:30 seemed to upset you.


>>We stood our ground, and the doors remained open. <<

Wow, a misunderstanding about obscure campaign rules becomes a battleground? How about just a plain misunderstanding?


>>A man in a wheelchair came in with his daughter, and said he was an Edwards supporter. When his daughter began to wheel him to the middle of the room, the Hillary operative tapped her on the shoulder, took the wheelchair and took him to the Clinton corner.<<

What Hilary operative? You mean supporter? Perhaps another Nevada voter who was for Hilary?

>>I rushed over from talking to an undecided voter and objected loudly, but his daughter was a Hillary person. <<

Sounds like you’re an anti-Hilary operative.

>>The Clinton operative said, "I don't control what he does; she does."<<

Apparently that was true as a father and daughter had arrived together and what they did was between them.

>>At that point I said to the man, "Nobody controls you. If you want to vote for Edwards, you have every right to go to the center of the room. Do you need help?" He looked at me plaintively, but said nothing as his daughter dragged him farther back into the corner and just shook his head. <<

He looked at you “plaintively” and “was dragged” somewhere? This is such biased language. Loaded with spin.


>>The Clinton operative herself had a Brooklyn accent and I overheard her mention having been from New York. <<

What the heck? How do you know she was an operative and not a voter working for HRC?

She was from New York? You mean an out of state operative coming in to muck up a caucus? Really? Or, why not tell the truth? Probably most of the people in the room were from out of state and had moved there. Nevada is growing like crazy.

>>I overheard her mention having been from New York. <<

Yeah, as in she moved from NY two years ago to a job or enjoy the sun or something? How do you know what she meant? Did you ask her if she was a resident?


http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/cb98-242.html
While Nevada's ...remained the nation's
fastest-growing state for the 13th straight year.
Nevada's population now has grown by a staggering
45.4 percent since April 1, 1990, increasing from 1,202,000 to 1,747,000.”


“When she stood to be counted in the middle of the room, I objected and asked her if she was actually from Nevada. She said yes. I talked to the chair and asked him to ask her name and find her on the list. He asked her her name and checked the list, and she was not on it.”

Now YOU sound like a real operative. She said "yes" and you called her a liar? Nice way to treat a fellow Dem. You are challenging someone based on their Brooklyn accent?? Give me a break.

>>At this point the chair said, "well, I can't ask for ID." I said, "She can't participate if no one will vouch for her."

Yeah, you were still calling her a liar, after she said she was from Nevada. You are quite an operative and I pitty the woman formerly from Brooklyn who showed up to be humiliated by you.

At this point a Hispanic man wearing a Hillary shirt said she was his wife. While that's not impossible, it was also improbable--but I had no way to verify or object further.<<

Not only is it possible but it’s probable. What is improbable is that total stranger a “ Hispanic” man would violate the rules and vouch for a total stranger.

>>One voter who hadn't even finished registering said that she was undecided, and the Hillary operative physically escorted her to the Hillary side.

I went to talk to the woman, but she was immediately surrounded by 3 Hillary supporters who would not let me in, and I had to attend to others registering at that point (our operatives were outnumbered by hers 2-1). <<

Ahhhh, “our operatives were outnumbered” so you and your operatives were working for another candidate. This sounds like operative warfare and this thread is at a cost to the Democratic party. It's so divisive and yet, so full of holes.


>>Hillary supporters were doing check-in, and a Hillary sign was behind them.<<

And YOU were doing checking in, as well: “I had to attend to others registering at that point (our operatives were outnumbered by hers 2-1).”


>>I forced the sign off the table, and I went to the front desk to verify that everything went according to the rules at checkin--but if nothing else, the necessity of doing so prevented me from doing other needed work.<<

Other needed work as an operative, right?

>>Even so, KK and I managed to convince 6 undecided/Edwards voters (Edwards & uncommitted both lacked viability in my caucus), while their cheating, ruthless operatives only convinced two--and our caucus outperformed the field, garnering 4 delegates to her 5.<<

So, here you are being an operative and convincing voters to vote your way. And YOU cry foul?

>>“It was intense--and it was war. “<<

Yeah, a war of ego’s, a war between operatives like you and a war that can destroy our party.

>>I knew what the Clinton operatives were up to, and they knew I knew.<<

>>It was bloodless war;<<

You see it as a war t you, not a voter caucus. I see it as letting people make their own decision in an important process in a free country.


>> I almost feel pity for the goodhearted Obama volunteers<<

So it’s good hearted “volunteers” for X but sociopathic operatives for Y?

>> who were unprepared for the level of sociopathy that I expected--and encountered--from the Clinton campaign.<<

Sounds to me like you are all about the little skirmish you feel you lost and not a dang bit worried about much else and will dilute party loyalty and create distrust in our own ranks to make this biased point.

YOu offer no evidence of anything, and in fact, the one woman you attacked publicly, at a caucus, turned out to have someone there who could vouch for her.

This is he kind of thing that will turn Democratic voters off, when the primaries are over, and could lower voter turn out- because it is just so nasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
76. In my town in Maine............
Caucus is not chaotic. Only 18 out of 200 registered Dems showed up for the 2004 caucus. ( Health care , and restaurant workers couldn't make it in many cases. it was Sun. afternoon!) There were no problems picking delegates to the state convention, only 2 for Dean. But we went with 2 more to the convention, having heard that there could b etrade offs and exchanges. There were, BUT our COunty Dem chairman dissappeared for the afternoon and we couldn't get our alternates O K'd There were definitely some low tricks being conducted in favor of the DLC choice Kerry!
And I would guess that most citizens here are honest voters............. Mostly they honestly voted for Bush. Yes there have to be changes made!
NV sounds like a real madhouse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
78. Ignore the Obama people. Every single allegation they make is complete bullshit.
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 04:24 PM by Perry Logan
Yet the Obama people keep repeating themselves. They will go their graves believing their own lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
80. Thank you for that post
Old school machine politics has made a big comeback in 2008 thanks to a certain someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
81. Oh hell yes, that is how the clintons over these last several years
have not only won the presidency twice from the facist bastards but hrc then had to surpress the votes in new york state so she could win two times as Senator....Oh hell yes...........NOT!!!!!!!....


If folks are bought that easily by some campaigns spin then L-rd help us all and hope there are not gullible millions out there.We saw this in 2000 with a gullible public, then in 2004 with a gullible public....or gore or kerry did not want the job as president, cause they sure as hell did not fight for it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
84. if it slithers like a snake, hisses like a snake it's a repuke DINO
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 04:47 PM by ooglymoogly
It is now clear to me why Edwards was unaccounted for in the Nevada caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
86. I'm Shocked!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
87. "Obama volunteers" ... "Clinton operatives"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
88. If this is true we win big time in Nov...The machines will be ours this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Did you just say that?
So election fraud is cool, as long as you are the winner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
89. This is why I HATE the caucus system.
There are a thousand ways things can go wrong either accidentally or on purpose. When I went to the only one I've ever gone to, there were LOTS of "irregularities," -- but only due to incompetence -- none of us seemed to know what we were doing, including the people running the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
93. This is what I expected from DLC Shillary ...not suprised at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
94. Oh Jesus, thereisnospoon has a scoop!
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 06:10 PM by gulliver
I must rethink my position. When thereisnospoon talks, we must listen. His/her handle is almost good enough to be a garage band name in Mattoon, Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
98. I have no idea if this is true or not, but
I think the caucus system is idiotic. It is too easy for people of all sides to be manipulated, and nothing is secret about it. This is not democratic at all and is not good for any dem candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
101. Thank you for posting this. Scary scary stuff.
I could almost live with a victory that Hillary actually deserved by convincing people that she is the only candidate that cares about children, or the only one that understands the middle income person's hard scrabble life or other nonsense she'd make up.

But this thievery makes me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. Most of the eyewitness accounts of the caucus in Nevada...
tell a totally different story...and they tend to back their stories up.

For example: this has already been linked, but the imposters/freepers amongst us did not bother to even read it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4127804

Poster is Emit//My caucus experience in Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tashca Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Your right
Most of the stories told in Iowa were much different than some of the crap you could read on here.
I am surprised so many people fall for such obvious misinformation.
You link to the story told by Emit is a good one......and much more realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. See response 66. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 31st 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC