Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Generally Speaking: 10 Questions for Wesley Clark ("I think about it every day.")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:06 AM
Original message
Generally Speaking: 10 Questions for Wesley Clark ("I think about it every day.")
NYT Magazine: Questions for Wesley K. Clark
Generally Speaking
Interview By DEBORAH SOLOMON
Published: July 1, 2007



(Q) As a retired four-star general and former presidential candidate, you’re about to publish a memoir whose title, “A Time to Lead,” might seem to suggest you’re personally eager to lead this country. Is that an accurate reading?

“A Time to Lead” is a time for America to lead. That is the intention of the title. Certainly we are having a leadership crisis. We have an administration that has lost all sense of strategic purpose in the Mideast. I am very concerned that we have lost the foundation of America’s worldwide power and influence. It has been squandered.

(Q) Are you referring to our military strength?

The most important element of power is not the military. After World War II and through the end of the 20th century, we had a legitimacy that magnified our military strength and economic strength. We weren’t like other powers. We weren’t after an empire. We didn’t torture. What we’ve lost is our legitimacy. It’s time for every American to be a leader.

(Q) Is that practical? If every American were a leader, there would be no one left for them to boss around.

Leaders don’t boss. Not if they’re any good. They persuade. And I think America needs a whole lot more persuading and a lot less bossing.

(Q)It sounds as if you’re running for president again as a Democrat.

I haven’t said I won’t. I think about it every day....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/magazine/01wwln-Q4-t.html?ref=magazine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry/Clark would've won in '04
No way the Swiftboaters would've been left unchallenged by Wes Clark.
Clinton/Clark, Obama/Clark, Clark/heckfire-just-about-anybody! '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The swiftLIARS Would Have Been Left Limp In Attacking Wes
stupid fucks that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Kerry/Clark Wouldn't Have Done Any Better
than Kerry/Edwards. I spoke to so many people in 2004 who said they wished the ticket were reversed. Kerry was directing that campaign, I don't see how having Clark (or any one else) on the ticket would have changed the Swift Boat response (or lack thereof). It's not even completely Kerry's fault. Another factor is the unfortunate circumstance of our convention being a month before the Repub. This meant we had to spread our general election money out over a longer period of time than Dubya. Therefore, we had inadequate resources (money) for a good response.

Clark may make a good running mate this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You see no difference between Wes Clark and John Edwards?
"I spoke to so many people in 2004 who said they wished the ticket were reversed."
That's interesting. No one, repeat no one, I spoke to thought Edwards was the right choice for the VP slot. And, while the Swiftboaters were attacking the top of the ticket, where was Edwards? Standing up to them? Sounding off? Counter attacking? Saying *anything*? We needed a man to respond to the Swiftboaters, and all we had was John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Big Difference Between Clark and Edwards
but that doesn't mean Clark would have done differently. The Pres candidate picks the team, the communication is at their direction. I know independents and "soft" Republicans who liked Clark and some who liked Edwards. I don't know any swing voters who liked Kerry, just those who dislike Dubya.

No one was looking for statements from Edwards on this, in fact, the media didn't seem all that interested in giving the Kerry campaign much of a chance to respond at all. They would show the Swift Boat ad as "news" and then have their pundits discuss it. Yeah, like that was fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Unfortunate circumstances... try horrendous planning by Terry McCauliffe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm Thinkin' Of Going To Little Rock On The Fourth. Who's With Me?
It'd be a perfect place to declare his candidacy, or Gore could declare there & name Wes as his running mate right off the bat! Sound good to you?
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Well, you know, Dinger....
Wes came to me in a dream last night and told me he was running...but he didn't tell me when or where he was going to announce. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Okay -- I gotta go get a NYTimes today!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm still hopeful...
But hot dogs? Why ask him about hot dogs?

Q: Why do Americans eat hot dogs on July 4?
A: Because they’re easier to cook than hamburgers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL
Too funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. A little levity for the Fourth? He gave a great answer!
Edited on Sun Jul-01-07 12:12 PM by DeepModem Mom
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Mmmm - hot dogs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. LOL. Great pic! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. I really appreciate the humor in the interview. Loved it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. A Gore/Clark ticket would be my DREAM ticket.
If we would EVER be able to turn this country around, those two could do it. Hands down.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Wes is one of the few people 'running' smarter than Al.
And that's saying a lot!
Gore/Clark '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. A Pic Of Wes & Al:
Edited on Sun Jul-01-07 05:04 PM by Dinger
My brother Al that is-:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm kicking this thread, dammit, whether it needs it or not!
Edited on Sun Jul-01-07 12:27 PM by Boo Boo
:kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What a kick!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yeah, decided maybe I better cut it down a little. I got a little carried away! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Oh -- I liked every one of those kicking Dem donkeys! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good sequence here
As a decorated leader yourself who served as NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander during the war in Kosovo, how would you assess the threat that Al Qaeda poses to this country?

Al Qaeda is not an existential threat to the United States the way the Soviet Union was. You have to understand that the Soviet Union was a country of more than 200 million people. Al Qaeda is maybe 50,000 angry and destructive individuals.

You make Al Qaeda sound as unthreatening as a schoolyard gang.

Al Qaeda is unpredictable and dangerous and has an unknown number of sympathizers. But the Soviets had thousands of nuclear warheads, nuclear bombs, biological and chemical warheads and specially trained assassination teams aimed at us, and all of it was on a hair-trigger status that could have been set off by accident or miscalculation.

Neoconservatives generally argue just the opposite, claiming that the fight against terrorism is no less daunting than the cold war and in fact constitutes “World War IV,” to borrow the title of Norman Podhoretz’s forthcoming book.

Thus far, we don’t have an opposing superpower against us, no matter how much the neoconservatives long for this. Perhaps the neoconservatives believe that we can only be defined by having an enemy.


He hits the neocons where they live, doesn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. "You make Al Qaeda sound as unthreatening as a schoolyard gang."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And that's what a true leader would do............remind us that we
have nothing to fear but fear itself. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Absolutely. OTOH, Deborah Solomon must have attended a very large school! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Brilliantly honest stuff from Clark here -
He does hit the neocons where they live too. Ironically, if those neocons had only been more open to ideas from one of their own -- remember Francis Fukuyama and the End of History? -- even they might have found a way to figure out the truth that Clark is talking about here.

I must admit, I generally find the idea that Clark could run for President to be rather laughable. I do hope and expect however that whatever Democrat wins the Presidency, whoever she may be, will use Clark as a resource for advice and ideas, whether inside the cabinet or out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Also see quote of the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
28.  Did you see this comment? I love it:
"Wow! All of the remaining Bush fans, all 28% of you, must feel so proud of your boy about now. Just think of it: a retired four star General of the US Army who once served as the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO says Bush is worse than Nixon."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. Unfortunately, Fukuyama made the same mistake as did Marx: discounting nationalism.
Edited on Sun Jul-01-07 09:36 PM by nealmhughes
Nationalism, while in a mild form can be a joyful expression of common communal identity, unfortunately, can often be an instrument of repression against the "differentiated other."

I don't think the neocons read the same Fukuyama as did I, frankly. It was a brilliant neo-Hegelian analysis of then contemporary events, but as do all forecasts, there is only a 50/50 chance of the prediction coming true.

Fukuyama promised the same things as did Marx, only by the economic inverse, and a liberal parliamentary process universal to be the decider of the path for all to take, vice the end of government as we know it per Marx. It would be either Westminster or Capitol Hill for all from Tuva to Timbuktu.

Now that is what the neocons loved: free enterprise and "liberal representative democracies," even though they actually are supported by New Gilded Age titans worthy of an Ayn Rand "novel" and their allies are among the most centralized monarchists/dictators on the face of the earth!

No wonder Dr. Francis cut his ties openly and loudly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. He ran before and won the Oklahoma primary
with no previous experience running for elected office. What part of the idea do you specifically find rather laughable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Honestly, bluntly, he was a Presidential "flavor of the month" back four years ago -
He's just too obscure four years later to be a serious candidate in my estimation. How do you explain who he is to most Americans? He was in command of NATO forces in Kosovo? ("Kosovo", where was that? When was that?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-02-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. American's understand the rank of four-star general.
Edited on Mon Jul-02-07 12:19 AM by calteacherguy
And he is far less "obscure" than he was when he ran in 04'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. By far the best portion...
In fact I had it copied and ready to be pasted until I saw it here.

Clark's ability to break down Bush's fear-factory in a couple of sentences is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. That is a great sequence....
The whole thing is great...He can mange to say so much with so few words....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. Brilliant and concise. He's able to cover so much ground
in just a few short sentences. Neocons beware ----> incoming, ROFL.

I still think he's gonna run :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. DMM here, just dropping back in to remark that Wes is looking MIGHTY FINE in that photo!
Adding nothing of substance to the discussion, of course.

:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I find "Mighty Fine" to be a very substantial quality, although never so all on its own....
But there is so much there there, within this one man, that your point is well taken, and reiterated! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. MIGHTY FINE indeed!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. No worries....
nothing wrong with noticing a mighty fine photo when you see one...And, I agree, mighty fine. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. K & R !!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. He is THE man! And I think about him running for President
every day, just as he does.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Reminds me of the recent Stephanie Miller interview...
When Wes gave her the "I think about it every day" answer, she responded "Not as much as we do." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. Thanks for posting, you beat me to it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-02-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. "Legitimacy". If we still had it we could be such a force for good.
We could have led the way on global warming, endangered species, clean water, Human rights, even influenced the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. The list goes on and on.

Thanks a lot, all you Neo-con bullies and war lovers. It is difficult to keep up with all the ways that you have damaged life on this planet.

There is so much wrong that must be set right. I only pray that we can still do it. 2008 seems like a long way off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 30th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC