Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Ten Week Gap, Rovegate, the CIA and the DOJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:40 PM
Original message
The Ten Week Gap, Rovegate, the CIA and the DOJ
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 09:29 AM by Skinner

First, it was an attack on Joe Wilson.
Then, they attacked his wife.
Then, they attacked the press for covering the story.
Now, it appears the Republican attack machine has set its sights on the prosecutor.

Rep. John Conyers, D-MI,
Ranking Member, House Judiciary Committee

www.johnconyers.com

Blogged by JC on 07.26.05 @ 02:21 PM ET

The Ten Week Gap, Rovegate, the CIA and the DOJ

I just blogged on the Huffington Post about the details of a ten week gap in the Rovegate investigation the Central Intelligence Agency advised me about in January of 2003.

update: I see Raw Story has more.

Rep. Conyers' post at Huffington - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/john-conyers/what-about-the-ten-week-g_4723.html

07.26.2005 Rep. John Conyers

What About the Ten Week Gap?

Going back a couple of years, I wrote two letters on September 29, 2003 about Treasongate. The first was a public letter (pdf) -- to the Department of Justice asking for a Special Prosecutor (I think I was the first Member of Congress to ask, but I have no illusions that my letter forced their hand).

The second (pdf) was not a public letter. It was to Central Intelligence Agency Director George Tenet. I was troubled by reports that the DOJ was, to put it mildly, being less than responsive to the CIA concerns about the leak. The response I received (pdf), reported way back then by Josh Marshall of Talkingpointsmemo on a Friday night (it is amazing how I always get the most valuable responses to my letters on Friday nights), added some stunning detail to the Justice Department's footdragging. Mr. Marshall reminds us about the story today.

The letter indicates that the Central Intelligence Agency was repeatedly stonewalled by the DOJ and, in fact, couldn’t even get their letters answered or calls returned. Here are some details:


more

And Raw Story comes through, again...

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Judiciary_Democrats_seek__investigation_into_12hour_0726.html

Judiciary Democrats seek investigation into why probe took so long; Sixty-seven days?
RAW STORY

Michigan Democrat John Conyers and nine Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee issued a letter to the U.S. Inspector General calling for an investigation into a 12-hour delay between the Justice Department learning of the outing of a CIA agent and telling the White House to preserve documents, RAW STORY has learned.

Perhaps more significantly, however, Judiciary Democrats point to the 67 day gap between the time the CIA called the Justice Department to investigate the CIA outing and the time that the Justice Department directed the FBI to investigate the matter.

"It appears the now infamous 12 hour delay the Justice Department granted the White House before issuing an order to preserve documents was not an isolated instance," Conyers remarked. "I received information from the Central Intelligence Agency indicating a pattern of foot dragging by the Justice Department before it would commence a criminal investigation, or even respond to CIA requests."

"While the Republican Congress prepares to launch hearings, which appear to be fishing expeditions designed to discredit the Special Counsel investigating this matter, it defies reason that it would not investigate the DOJ's obviously partisan administration of justice," he added.

Rep. Conyers' & other HJC members'new letter to the U.S. Inspector General:

July 26, 2005

Dear Inspector General Fine:

We write to request that you immediately commence an investigation of the Department of Justice's handling of the investigation of the leak of the identity of a covert CIA operative's identity by high-ranking Administration officials. Press reports and other information obtained by House Judiciary Committee Democrats appear to demonstrate that on at least two separate occasions, DOJ personnel acted to permit delays in the investigation, which may have resulted in the loss or destruction of critical evidence.

First, over this past weekend we learned that then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales received what appears to be a "heads-up" about the commencement of the investigation from Justice Department officials in the evening of September 29. Through White House staff, he asked DOJ personnel if it was permissible to wait an additional 12 hours to notify the White House staff of the investigation and presumably direct the staff to preserve all relevant documents and records relating to the inquiry. According to Mr. Gonzales, "Department of Justice lawyers" gave their assent to this delay:

I specifically had our lawyers go back to the Department of Justice lawyers and ask them, "Do you want us to notify the staff now, immediately or would it be okay to notify the staff early in the morning?" And we were advised, go ahead and notify the staff early in the morning, that would be okay.

Notwithstanding this request, Mr. Gonzales informed the White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card about the investigation. It is not yet known who the White House Chief of Staff advised about the investigation prior to the Counsel's official notification twelve hours later.

more.


This man is amazing!!!!! :yourock:


edited formatting



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nominated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. seconded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. thank god republicans put an end to the politics of personal destruction!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. See related post-CIA letter to Rep Conyers; Jan 30 2004- WH had 67 days...
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 04:43 PM by paineinthearse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Summary of all Rovegate work done by House Judiciary Cmty (Dems)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, paineinthearse! We can always count on Conyers.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Big Question: WWJCD-What Would John Conyers Do?
:kick: Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, for a start, he is one of the original co-sponsors
See KevinPDAmerica's post in "greatest".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. H.Res.375 - Barbara Lee's resolution of inquiry
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 06:32 PM by paineinthearse
Demands POUS & SOSUS all documents related to Iraq policy for the period leading up to the invasion.

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution all information in the possession of the President and the Secretary of State relating to communication with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002, and October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq.

See Kevin PDA's post at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4195618
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great post paineinthearse, thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. kicking a great thread
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. The John Conyers Forum
Some may have not discovered the John Conyers Forum. For those, see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=340

If you have, feel free to participate there. To this point it has served as a place that holds "reference" posts, pointing to discussions in other forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's kinda interesting to watch the slime ooze out.
As someone in a post this morning said: "(paraphrasing) If you keep shitting in the same spot, you'll eventually step in it."

:kick: and nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 26th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC