|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 08:49 PM Original message |
Finally found a picture with some fuselage from 9-11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wonder if they sprayed that piece of fuselage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 01:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It was before. Otherwise the dust (ash) would stick to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 07:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The boiling point of aluminum is not that high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 07:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. One would think a self proclaimed materials expert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. One would think. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 01:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. aluminum melts at lower temp then it vaporizes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 07:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I was responding to the statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
43. Yes, typically, aluminum melts at a temperature lower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. "Aluminum can also vaporize approaching its melting temperature." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. What kind of steel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. How did the fusilage get from WTC1 to WTC5? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ferry Fey (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Spray-painted notation NTSB? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. The caption for the picture on the FEMA site: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 02:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Most likely planted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ferry Fey (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Piece "ejected from WTC2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 09:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Perhaps the piece went through the building? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 03:28 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Here ya go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 05:53 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. So the piece of fuselage landed on the top of WTC5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 06:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. No most of WTC5 did not collapse on 911. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 06:47 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. More accounts of heavy damage from debris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The mystery 'bulge' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I don't know ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. I would believe a 'bulge' in a 47-story skyscraper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 03:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Why would you think that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. So visible to witnesses, but not to cameras? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:39 PM Response to Reply #45 |
60. Thank for the laugh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Speaking of photographic/video evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 08:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Please prove that it wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 05:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. killtown is the one that said it was planted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 05:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. He said most likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 07:35 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. No, he did not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 01:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Yes I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. You need to pick a statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Shall I call a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. A waambulance ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. For people who gripe over the pettiest things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. I was just trying to confirm your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Then you should have asked me to clarify my statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. I did ask in a very direct manner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:21 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. A whiny direct manner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. "Most likely planted" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 03:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. You seemed to have forgotten to mention that in your first reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. See, that wasn't so hard to realize now, was it?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. Well, if you hadn't completely contradicted yourself,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 07:37 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. And how would someone prove it wasn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 07:42 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. For the same reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 09:14 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Deleted message |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 08:00 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Well, there isn't "any photographic/video evidence" that it WAS planted,.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
50. Who said it needed a crane to be lifted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. It is pretty light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. He had help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:32 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I believe most office stairways would not accommodate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. No, and "Most likely planted" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. In your estimation, how many pieces should have "flown out"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. odds are that there are always smaller pieces of debris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #52 |
61. But you know that three is the wrong number somehow? ( n/t ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rich Hunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. that looks funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It's on FEMA's website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 24th 2024, 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC