|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:11 AM Original message |
Using geometry to analyze angles of descent of falling debris from WT1 & WT2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. "it seems that the math would be relatively straightforward" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. But I mean the for the areas ABOVE where there would have been such a collision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. "Apply a downward force shattering the glass" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. "it would be more straightforward than you imply" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. "So why don't you go ahead and do whatever it is you have in mind, instead of talking about it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. "...I find it odd that you would choose to shoot down an approach..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. As I said, BEFORE the collison, BEFORE. So there would be no bounce effect at top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You may be asking a decent question... but you are refusing flatly to listen to the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Simplifying for calculation is a regrettable concession that has to be made in any study. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. "-Fine. Accepted. Does this mean it can't be done?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Always driven to the point where any discussion that could open new doors is even conceivable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. what is incurious about Realityhack's response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
63. "How could Rh revise it to make it more curious?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #63 |
73. A Better Observation, RH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:29 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Please see my post below. But that's a really silly argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #73 |
87. Again, ad hominem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. You do not appear to understand the term 'ad hominem'. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. OK. Withdrawn. Ad Bonobo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #88 |
92. Weak gruel of a response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #63 |
86. "But it appears bonobo just refuses to accept that answer." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #40 |
85. No, I think consideration is being rejected out of hand for no reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #85 |
140. I stated my position in the post you just replied to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. I'm Curious About How Cells Divide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. Well stated post. Your patience is noteworthy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #55 |
90. Misplaced more like. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #90 |
106. You do realize you just put yourself down right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. "He he. Ranked yerself out!" We used to say that. In Junior High. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #43 |
89. Half of that is a false analogy and the rest proceeds from a strawman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #89 |
116. The contradiction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Sounds like you now agree that it is an avenue that is open to investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #118 |
126. I have never thought otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. I have not seen the type of analysis I am describing and if you have, links would be appreciated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #128 |
135. See #133 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
84. RH, so it is too complex AND it cannot be simplified in any way for any analysis? WOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #84 |
94. No. You are entitled to your opinion, but your opinion is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. So what is the 'opinion' that is wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #101 |
119. wrong place. self delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
120. Now that we have arrived at that, I guess your work is done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
83. Here RH starts with "It is too complex for you to understand, so you can't discuss." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #83 |
97. Reading comprehension.... your doing it wrong. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Spelling ability --"your" doing it wrong. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Absolutely and let me be the first to admit it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
82. It is from this point, in my view that you began to say "Do it yourself or it isn't true." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #82 |
98. That is not what was said. You are seeing what you want to see. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. But we know that the top of the towers were tilting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yes, that is true. But a tipping object... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Sure... if it was some sort of ideal solid object |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. "The top twenty or thirty floors of the towers are not a pair of dice that are going to roll" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. By now you should clearly see how this dance works... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It is becoming painfully obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
56. spot on man. thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
138. thank you. very well put. spot on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. The fact that you posted those two videos as a response to what Hack wrote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. And you do because?????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. As I said, we have veered off this topic of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. "I won the (sub) point (and red herring) by any reasonable standard" ROTFLMFAO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. HELLO? I don't care. Stop deflecting the point of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Those are concrete buildings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Deflect! Pwwww! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. I guess you can't answer the question? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Not at all, my position is that it has nothing to do with the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Then why did you post those videos? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I said that a tipping object would fall in a predictable arc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Again you miss the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #37 |
68. " So I playfully posted videos that show that they are rather sturdier than one might expect." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:41 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. That is precisely one of the things that SOME people find odd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #70 |
112. Well, it's not that odd to a lot of other people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Again, this is not the point, but actually a sub-thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #114 |
121. As I've said, it's possible but it's not simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Is the reverse possible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #122 |
130. Try asking your question again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. I think you have answered well enough, thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tenseconds (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 08:58 AM Response to Reply #112 |
146. but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #146 |
148. Especially not if it is shooting debris outwards at the same time! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Those are reinforced concrete structures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Deflect! Pwwww! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. It sounds as if they are geometrically opposed to discussing the subject. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Odd thing on a discussion board. Especially one devoted to discussing THIS subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
48. And your answer to his question is what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. What I fail to understand is why you keep saying that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
45. See my essay above about "simple questions" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Deflect! Pwwww! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. Since steel buildings are not in the habit of collapsing .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. oops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. You can't fool me. You're part of the global Swine Flu illuminati! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. I don't see any rebar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Oh dear oh dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. So, although I've provided you with evidence that the building is in fact made out of concrete... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Exactly who the hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Oh, poutrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. If that's the the mental process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Well, let's see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. So what that the report mentions concrete???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. When it's the main descriptive adjective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:13 AM Response to Reply #58 |
65. I finally followed the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Form the link YOU posted "...An old flour factory... " n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. We've got to go with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #71 |
95. Nope but nice try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Well first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. I was wondering how long it would take for you to ask that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Why would we be interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. "You haven't provided any evidence here regarding concrete falling differently than steel." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. All I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #108 |
115. They are called verbs in Japanese. You put endings on them to change the meaning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #115 |
123. Like Spanish .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. I find it hard to believe you are serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #110 |
117. It is not EXACTLY what I asked but close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #117 |
124. Now you're being rather dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #117 |
149. Tell me the mass of each peice of debris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. I can do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #150 |
165. And.....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #165 |
166. I actually have an interesting thing I have been reading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 09:32 AM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Yes it can certainly be calculated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #167 |
168. With that information... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #168 |
170. Theoretical? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #170 |
171. Not to mention the missing information... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:28 AM Response to Reply #54 |
62. you accused him of misrepresenting what you posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. *snarf* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:21 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Actually from the English article and the second paragraph it appears it was a flour mill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. yes they were regarding the structure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. UMMMM so all the desks ,office,furniture, people , file cabinets, mini fridges,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:18 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. 'load bearing' is an engineering term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #59 |
69. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #69 |
93. No but all the floors were concrete and they are a big part of the structure.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. This is why lay people have difficulty discussing things with engineers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. Wouldn't even structural concrete be steel reinforced??? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #107 |
113. HELL YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #113 |
125. So then you are saying the Concrete building is essentialy a steel building... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. I'm not an official people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Excuse me no offense meant. But they are both steel framed buildings no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Hmmm....are you sure about that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. I'm going to save |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. Who would have thought that simple factual questions could be so stresful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #38 |
100. That isn't a steel-framed building. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. Apparently, he believes the H1N1 vaccination program is a "demolition" of some kind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:18 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Sleuth you are not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
72. A Serious Question For You... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. It may be serious, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Funny you should ask.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. You missed the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:38 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Ah..... and now you understand the function of peer review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. I always did, don't be silly. Why have YOU been arguing as if such a thing does not exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:04 AM Response to Reply #78 |
81. If you were prepared to admit this, why post #76? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. I have not rejected anything but that is immaterial here. Don't change the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
133. Alternatively, (simulations) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:40 PM Response to Reply #133 |
139. Thank you (re Y axis). I just became aware of this myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:38 PM Response to Reply #133 |
141. where is the south tower simulation where half the plane goes out the side but .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 01:24 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. I doubt if modeling something that appears to have only occurred in your imagination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 01:25 AM Response to Reply #142 |
143. Its NISTs imagination read the report. Oh no I am sounding like an official story person..Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 01:51 AM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Then you should have no problem producing a direct quote stating "half the plane goes out the side." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #144 |
147. Oh good grief if you do not believe me look at the damn video. Its obvious.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #147 |
151. Ahem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. Ohhh And post 142 was not snarky??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. It's up to you whether you want to have a discussion or trade punches. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #153 |
158. Lecturing instead of discussing especially when you started it is just another way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 07:59 PM Response to Reply #147 |
154. The NIST report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. It doesn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. If you post a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 11:49 PM Response to Reply #157 |
161. Sure thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #154 |
156. There's no other way to say this, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #154 |
159. But But But How can they say exactly how many core columns were taken out then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. Not important .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #160 |
162. Well my point was kinda that the computer models used were how many columns.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 12:34 AM Response to Reply #162 |
163. So is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #163 |
169. Exactly! Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-04-09 03:42 AM Response to Reply #147 |
164. It is precisely because I have watched the videos that I don't believe you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-05-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #164 |
172. What are you a no planer??? You can see the plane exploding out the side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-05-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #172 |
173. Do you believe the plane was made of jet fuel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-05-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #173 |
174. The right Engine from that plane was found on top of a police car blocks away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-05-09 07:25 PM Response to Reply #174 |
175. So then you believe the plane was just two engines and nothing else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-05-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #175 |
176. Show how NIST proves this assertion. Can you prove... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 06:31 AM Response to Reply #176 |
177. you simply moved the goalposts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #176 |
178. The only one in this conversation demanding anything is you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #141 |
145. I dunno, write and ask them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC