ae911truth.org is a 9/11 Cover Up Perp Site

[CB_Brooklyn]

One must understand what's going on here; it's not that difficult to.

I made numerous posts in the ae911truth forum, the most recent ones including the following links:

911 Octopus 8: Media Perps Unmasked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ySSJ_L6Zs

CNN Cartoon - 19 Rector Street building should NOT be there:

http://www.911researchers.com/node/389

The Frozen Fireball


http://www.911researchers.com/node/483

Half in, half out. No break in building between engines and fuselage.


Technology Review Magazine Discusses TV-Fakery

http://www.911researchers.com/node/174

These Videos of REAL Plane Crashes Explain 9/11 TV-Fakery Very Clearly
http://www.911researchers.com/node/98


I also posted links to Dr Judy Wood's new work:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html


Less than 24 hours later, Gage disabled the forums. This did not come as a surprise actually, since Gage is promoting Steven Jones and is therefore a 9/11 Coverup Perp distracting people from the REAL provable inside job evidence of Exotic Weaponry and TV-Fakery at the WTC.

Steven Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.

Another Cover Up Perp, Greg Jenkins, did an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. It has recently been discovered that Jenkins' has ties to the NSA. Only after a close analysis of this interview:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Jenkins_transcript.html did Dr Wood realize what Jenkins wanted kept secret.

Judy's new paper is based on the data that Jones/Jenkins want kept hidden:

Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html


Jones and his group have been doing everything possible to discourage people from looking at Judy Wood's directed energy weapon work and the obvious TV-Fakery evidence. (Yes, obvious, as demonstrated in the links at the top.) Why is Jones doing this?


Wood filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with NIST, and this RFC is archived on a US Government website:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Jenkins_transcript.html

Where is Jones' RFC? I don't see it there. Where is it? Where is the proof that he even sent one? No, a press release is not proof. Dr Wood sent her RFC registered mail, return receipt requested. Did Jones do this? I doubt it.

Jones is a cold fusion and 9/11 fraud. People need to wake up and look at the bigger picture to what's happening.

9/11 wasn't about the "Neocon political agenda", it was about energy. It was about population reduction. Read the info here and learn that Jones was a plant in 1989 to discredit free-energy research:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125

Are you aware that, in 2004, Dr Eugene Mallove wrote an open letter to the world asking for research funds for Cold Fusion and Zero Point energy? A few months later, Eugene was murdered.

A very similar situation is of Michael Zebuhr, a 9/11 research student of Judy Wood's, who did experiments to prove Jones' research faulty. A few weeks later, he was murdered.

And then there's the Virginia Tech "inside job". Why didn't the police close off the area following that massacre? Perhaps it's because they knew who the perpetrators were. It just so happens that Judy Wood graduated from V-Tech and it was some of her instructors who were killed.

All Judy wants people to do is look at the data, the same data that Jones and his group discourage people from looking at. There is mass internet censorship of Dr Wood's work. Yet, it's her work that stands up to the facts.

People say that a directed energy weapon cannot "dustify" steel. But it can! Watch the film "Race To Zero Point" on google and you will learn. Zero Point... the same technology that Dr Mallove wanted research funds for. And then he was murdered.

People need to start thinking for themselves and looking at evidence. Where is the proof that Jones found evidence of thermate? For all we know his baggie could be contents from his vacuum bag.

Jones/Jenkins have ties to Los Alamos directed energy weapon research. This is the same technology that Judy Wood's censored work is about.

For everyone's sake, I hope the bigger picture is becoming clearer to everyone!

The new OGCT will soon become "conventional controlled demolition" of the towers and WTC 7 after "the airplanes hit". No mention of the round cylindrical holes in WTC 5, no mention of toasted cars, no mention of TV-Fakery. What will happen then? A new investigation based on the work of a former Los Alamos researcher? What will happen then? Impeach Bush? What will that do? We must remove the 9/11 perpetrators from power. This includes people associated with directed energy weapons, as well as the corporate media.

For the future of humanity, this is what must be done.

Are we now getting the bigger picture?

[LARED]

1. People need to start thinking for themselves and looking at evidence

I'm pretty sure this is the only sentence I agree with in your whole post.

[Make7]

2. I would also agree with the following from the opening post:

 

Wood filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with NIST, and this RFC is archived on a US Government website

- Make7
www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619   (3/16/07)

[sabbat hunter]

3. time to debunk this crap

1) the fireball isnt frozen, the entire picture is. if you notice the debris isnt falling from the building, the smoke isnt moving. someone played with the video and froze the shots. but if you go google for that video you will see the one that killtown put up is phony and BS.


2) the plane isnt half in and half out of the building, it is about to enter the building. it is an optical illusion because of the shadow of the building.

[vincent_vega_lives]

4. Ohhhh thats fucking brilliant!

3. 19 Rector Street building. LOOK AT THE FUCKING TREES. The perspective is all off. The picture taken in the winter is closer.

Why oh why lord?

[greyl]

5. Imo, posts like the ones you made there only serve to obscure truth.

They are time-wasting distractions and absolutely ridiculous, especially on a site that was allegedly trying to raise the bar of technical discussion.
Congratulations.

[Grateful for Hope]

6. I agree with you on this one n/t

[greyl]

7. Great. I still don't trust you. nt