Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ appoints Special Prosecuter to CIA Leak Investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:14 PM
Original message
DOJ appoints Special Prosecuter to CIA Leak Investigation
Breaking on MSNBC...no link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are just dragging it out until after the 2004 elections.
This should have been done long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbes159 Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Will take a couple of months to get the appointment confirmed
Only then will the prosecuter be able to look at the evidence -- even more time for the evidence to be shredded or doctored (if it hadn't already happened)....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who are they appointing, Ted Olsen?
Some other fuck who has ties to the BFEE?

Inquiring minds want to know the connection the SP will have to the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kissinger?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Didn't catch the name...on CNN now nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Took them this long to find the "right" person for the job
and you can bet they've been thoroughly vetted by the VPs office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. How about James Baker of Baker Botts?
I hear that he's coming home soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. ON CNN: Ashcroft recuses himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yaoo link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. HERE'S THE GUY! START DIGGING!
T"he investigation will be headed by the U.S. attorney in Chicago, Patrick Fitzgerald..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Apponted by Bush Jr. and confirmed by the Senate Oct 24, 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Ahh, so the fix is in...
Oh well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. I don't know.
Your link states that Sen. Dick Durbin promoted Fitzgerald's appointment. Maybe, * was throwing a bone with Fitzgerald's nomination, and it's coming back to bite his arse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. maybe he thought he would go against the dem Daley
a reasonable guess, and Fitzgerald may eventually get around to it, which would be ok with me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I'm glad to hear Durbin endorsed his appointment
I think we should give the guy a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. Fitzgerald confirmation closely follows 9/11. Bush was not to be denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. he's the best
he's the first real U.S. Attorney Chicago has had in my lifetime.

60 people have been convicted so far in the George Ryan scandal, and Ryan just got indicted.

He also nailed the Repug crook mayor of Cicero.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He was appointed by the Chimp though
You think he's trustworthy? I guess he could be...I dunno, it sounds too good to be true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. if anything, he's too aggressive
He wrote an editorial defending the Patriot Act, which I disagreed with.

But, he basically destroyed the GOP in IL, probably for a long time, and he's not done yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Well, this is encouraging
I'm realizing this is the same guy who went after Gotti, so he can't be all that bad...I just hope he maintains his integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He does owe Bush big time though
Bush went against the party regulars to appoint Fitzgerald as U.S. Atty. I'd feel better if the Bush appointment wasn't part of his past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Thanks, Cocoa, I'm feeling better about this now.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Very encouraging news. Maybe some "normal" Repubs want
Rove axed. Cheney next??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Yes, he's a true DOJ 'professional'
He was endorsed by Dick Durbin, who is 'Mr. Clean', as we Illinoisans know!

Woo hoo! Will KKKarl do the perp walk? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. So something real might come of this?
This news is almost too good to be true it seems. Maybe because of the way it came out of nowhere. I guess the CIA and Wilson must really want something done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. Yes
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 02:37 PM by Padraig18
Fitzgerald is a barracuda in pinstripes--- just ask former Governor Ryan or John 'The Dapper Don' Gotti. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. He's VERY good!
He has nailed Governor Ryan and 66 others involved in the 'license for bribes' scandal here in IL! He is also the prosecutor who went after the Mob iin NYC, and got Gotti, et al.

You are well and TRULY f*cked now, KKKarl!

Woo hoo! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. A tid bit
He contributed to republican Tim Johnson.

http://www.tray.com/cgi-win/indexhtml.exe?MBF=NAME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. You mean Democratic Senator Tim Johnson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. According to Politcal Moneyline
The Tim Johnson dondated to is a repulican

http://www.tray.com/cgi-win/x_candpg.exe?DoFn=H0IL15053*2000

It was a $250 contribution in January of 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. MY Congressman!
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 02:19 PM by Padraig18
:puke:

On edit: A very prominent attorney in his own right, however. Could be a friendship thing. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alonso_quijano Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. link to Yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. ...reports to James Comey, Ashcroft's new assistant
James Comey is a total BFEE tool. Here's just one link to some info:

http://www.talkleft.com/archives/004516.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. If the CIA wants your ass you are screwed, BFEE tool or no
Honestly, after looking at this Fitzgerald guy I like what I see. Something real may come of this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. IT'S A FUCKING SHAM!!!
They appointed a Bush appointed U.S. Attorney who reports to a BFEE TOOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Well, DUers figured it out in less than 10 mins. How long will it take
the US media? I estimate, oh, 25 years, if ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. info on fitzgerald from chi trib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. prosecuted Gotti
i still think fitzgerald is a GOP plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. As much as I want to believe this, it's hard to swallow.
They may just be planning to run out the clock or they have already set up a fallguy who can't hurt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. Fitzgerald will not be fooled.
The man is a barracuda in pinstripes, and someone WILL do hard time over this; he is very much a 'let the chips fall where they will' professional! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbes159 Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. So, Clinton gets investigated by a rabid partisan right-winger....
But Bush* gets to be investigated by a man that he appointed to his current job? That doesn't raise the appearance of the possibility of impropriety? How is that different from Ashcroft's position? Dems in Congress should be point this out....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. That crossed my mind, too
Can you imagine the stink if the special prosecutor who investigated Clinton had been appointed by him? Who knows, maybe Fitzgerald will be thorough and nonpartisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbes159 Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I find it difficult to believe that anyone Bush* would want for the job
would be nonpartisan.....

If he really has nothing to hide, then go ahead and appoint the most dedicated anti-bush person you can, because he won't find anything and there won't be any doubt that it was investigated thoroughly, right? </sarcasm>

Every time this administration stonewalls, whitewashs, or pawns scandels off to some partisan to investigate the more it stinks of their collective guilt....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I too am skeptical of this move, however
From what I've been able to determine about Fitzgerald so far, he seems to be an OK pick especially if he maintains his integrity. It's quite possible this move to appoint a special prosecutor and one that at first glance seems above board was done because the CIA is pissed and they pulled strings to make this happen. Remember, the CIA is powerful and they want a REAL investigation.

That being said, the problems as I see them:

In the amount of time it took to get to this point, much of the evidence could have and very well may have been scrubbed, such as WH emails, memos and correspondence.

Fitzgerald has to be wholly uncorruptible to carry out a fair investigation AND he still is supervised by one of JA's henchman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. MSNBC says there will be a live news conference at 2 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. He does seem to have close Republican ties
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 02:06 PM by starroute
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/7460980.htm

"James Comey, the new No. 2 at the Justice Department, has an impressive array of terrorism and violent-crime cases under his belt. But he's perhaps best known these days as the prosecutor who indicted Martha Stewart, transforming the diva of domesticity into the most recognizable face of white-collar corruption.

"Confirmed by the Senate on Tuesday as the deputy attorney general, Comey takes the reins at a Justice Department under fire for its bold antiterrorism tactics and facing questions about its investigation into the leak of a CIA officer's name.

<snip>

"Some accused Comey of targeting Stewart to boost his profile. Not so, said Comey's close friend Patrick Fitzgerald, who's the U.S. attorney in Chicago. . . ."


Aside from that, Fitzgerald seems like a reasonably fair-minded prosecutor. For example, he's been going after former Governor Ryan on those corruption allegations. (Or is it possible somebody wanted to pull him off that case?)


On edit: I just looked up at post #11 and see that his pal Comey is the one he'll be reporting to. That is not reassuring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. Oh that is not good
Hmm...still, I am going to give this one the benefit of the doubt for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. News Conference On CSPAN now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Patrick J. Fitzgerald
Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago
2002 Bill of Rights in Action Benefit
Patrick J. Fitzgerald


PATRICK J. FITZGERALD began serving as the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois on September 1, 2001. He was initially appointed on an interim basis by Attorney General John Ashcroft, succeeding former U.S. Attorney Scott R. Lassar. Subsequently, he was nominated by President George W. Bush. The United States Senate confirmed his nomination by unanimous consent on October 23, 2001, and President Bush signed his commission on October 29, 2001.

Prior to his appointment, Mr. Fitzgerald served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the United States Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York for thirteen years. He has served as Chief of the Organized Crime-Terrorism Unit since December 1995, in addition to holding other supervisory positions during his tenure in that office.

As U.S. Attorney, Mr. Fitzgerald is the district's top federal law enforcement official. He manages a staff of 250, including 137 Assistant U.S. Attorneys who handle civil litigation, criminal investigations and prosecutions involving public corruption, narcotics trafficking, violent crime, and white-collar fraud.

In New York, Mr. Fitzgerald participated in the prosecution of United States v. Usama Bin Laden, et al., in which 23 defendants were charged with various offenses, including conspiracy to murder United States nationals overseas and the August 1998 bombings of the Untied States embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Seven defendants are in custody in the United States; three defendants are in custody in the United Kingdom; and thirteen defendants are fugitives. Four defendants went on trial in January 2001 in New York, and a jury returned guilty verdicts against all four on May 29, 0201. All four were sentenced to life in prison on October 18, 2001.

Mr. Fitzgerald also participated in the trial of United States v. Omar Adbel Rahman, et al., a nine-month trial in 1995 of twelve defendants who participated in a seditious conspiracy that involved the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and a spring 1993 plot to bomb the United Nations, the FBI Building in New York, and the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels, as well as a conspiracy to assassinate President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt. He also supervised the case of United States v. Ramzi Yousef, et al., the 1996 prosecution of three defendants who participated in a conspiracy in the Philippines in late 1994 and early 1995 to detonate bombs simultaneously on twelve American airliners. In 1993, Mr. Fitzgerald participated in the six-month trial of United States v. John Gambino, et al., the prosecution of a Gambino crime family capo and his crew for narcotics trafficking, murder, racketeering, jury tampering, and other charges.

Among Mr. Fitzgerald's awards and honors are the Attorney General's Award for Exceptional Service in 1996 and the Stimson Medal from the Association of the Bar of the City of New York in 1997. In New York, Mr. Fitzgerald's other supervisory posts were National Security Coordinator from February 1996 to January 1999 and Chief of the Narcotics Unit from January to June 1994.

Mr. Fitzgerald, 41, is a native of Brooklyn, NY. He joined the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan in 1998 after three years as a litigation associate at the New York law firm, Christy & Viener. He graduated from Amherst College, Phi Beta Kappa, with a bachelor's degree in economics and mathematics in 1982, and from Harvard Law School in 1985.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. I think Ashcroft just blinked!
After all, there's no evidence that HE'S involved, so maybe he decided it's time to 'fold, instead of hold'. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. maybe naked boobies are involved
maybe his loathing for naked boobies overcame his love for Bush, so to speak.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Asscraft doesn't 'have a dog in the fight', so to speak.
I think he knows someone is gonna do hard time, and is doping everything he can to distance himself from the odium that will attach. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. :-) :-) :-)
I'm guessing it's Rove. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. Wouldn't you just LOVE to see KKKarl do 'the perp walk'
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 03:44 PM by Padraig18
The idea of him in an orange jumpsuit stenciled "Federal Inmate" brings me close to orgasm! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. Why die he leave New York? Very odd, the timing, right before
9-11-01. I don't know if that is significant, just a bit of a red flag. I am going to google his NY law firm to sniff around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. The evidence has already been purged
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 02:09 PM by tom_paine
Neat how the Busheviks got and went through the returned questionaires from their henchpersona FIRST.

Please, this stinks like a Soviet "investigation".

And I'm sure will yield the same results.

"Comrades! Our Glorious Leader's name has been CLEARED!"

It seems like so long ago that America was truly free, though I am glad the Busheviks haven't started the ultimate phase of their program yet, allowing me to sort of pretend that I still live in a Free Country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Maybe....maybe not...
That's what I've been thinking about since I heard this.

On the one hand, the scenario you describe is 100% standard Bushevik behavior.

On the other hand, it's going to be hard to get Fitzgerald to come out and say, "I can't figure out who leaked." A whole slew of journalists KNOW who leaked the Plame information to them. Fitzgerald isn't going to easily be able to put some other person forward as the fall guy when they know that some journalists know who it is. Same goes for coming up with noone.

So, I'm not sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. My guess...
... is that Ashcroft stayed on long enough to see if this investigation would amount to much. He likely would not have recused himself if significant damage control would have been needed.

So Ashcroft knows there is no real evidence of anything pointing to any White House big shots and/or helped cover up anything that could have posed any danger to the Bush administration, then resigns knowing that when the investigation turns up little to nothing he can say he isn't stonewalling or limiting the investigation because he had recused himself.

Maybe a little tin foil hatish, which I am not known for, but that is my first guess.

I could be totally wrong though, but I expect absolutely nothing to come from this CIA Leak Investigation.

Imajika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Possible, but maybe Ashcroft was blackmailed by the CIA
"Let this Fitzgerald guy investigate the leak or we go public with that embarassing bit of info you know we have on you"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. Unfortunately, you may be right
Ashcroft had plenty of time to go through and vet all the evidence, all the questionaires and coach all the witnesses. Anything incriminating like memos, emails etc. had plenty of time to be scrubbed and dissappeared or declared top secret nat'l security of the highest level.

So, what we might have is a situation where they actually can appoint a straight up guy who will investigate thoroughly, but he'll have nothing to find and his case may consist of mere hearsay and "he said she said". IOW, the word of people in the admin. vs. the word of either people in the CIA or reporters. Unfortunately, that's not enough to prosecute anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
55. on CSPAN, too
:) just tuned in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
56. Creepy.
Comey looks like a young Ashcroft! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. After six months...?
Why didn't he do that a long time ago?

Will this ever move forward?
Bush as much as told the reporters involved that they had better not divulge the source when he said 'it would probably never be solved because reporters never divulge their sources'.

To get around this, "Reporter_A" tells "Reporter_B" the identity of the senior White House officials who leaked the information.
"Reporter_B" reports on the leak, but can keep the identity of "Reporter_A" confidential.

I believe there were possibly six "Reporter_A"s who were called by the senior White House officials. The problem here is that they probably all work for Faux News or else the leaks wouldn't have been given to them. They might think protecting the administration is more important than protecting a CIA operation that was keeping us safe from rogue nuclear weapons.

Do I feel any safer than two years ago? Not when this White House feels it is OK to expose a covert operation this important to our national security for their personal political revenge.

Who would have ever thought anyone that close to the seat of power would be so irresponsibly partisan to even consider compromising national security for the politics of personal destruction. Those people have done damage that leaves us all exposed to a higher terror threat. They have to be removed from access to any more information immediately. Leaving them in place for the past six months may have given them the opportunity to pass along more secrets to our enemies. They may not be over zealous partisans, they may actually be working for our enemies.

This is where the Patriot act might have been used effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Clearly, they are hiding....let's see the media "rip into this meatbone"
then again they have proven to be nothing but a subservient "lapdog"...who will do nothing w/o his masters permission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 27th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC